My Game 3 loss rant

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

This is a lot to digest. I am not a big fan of Stotts. Probably my biggest gripe is that there is a lack of accountability for the players. Let's take just one small example from the game. Mc collum now in the league and under Stotts for seven years I think. How many times over those years has his help defense been effective? Isn't he a guy who should always be making sure he is close enough to his guy so the guy can't get off a clean three point shot? But he leaves Caldwell Pope wide open for a three. That should NEVER happen, but it happens a lot on this team. What if Hezonja was held accountable for his constant bonehead plays? I feel like that in general the team is not taught the details of blocking out, setting screens, making crisp passes that enable the receiver to put up a shot immediately. I've always thought that if Stotts could get a great associate head coach and give him some authority, that Stotts system could thrive. But he has never done that. I would like to see him go. (BTW, wasn't it interesting that even Eric liked OP's post?)
Other playoff teams that I have been watching seem to be more decisive on offense, making a couple quick passes that set up a drive or an open three. I think that is why trapping Lillard works; not so much stopping his scoring, but because he really runs the offense by himself. As successful as that system has been over the years; do the playoffs show that it is a vulnerable system?
1. Leaving Caldwell-Pope open might be the least of available evils.
2. Hezonja WAS held accountable for his bonehead moves. Then we lost half the team and are effectively forced to play him because all our guys get 5 fouls on them.

All the Stotts-haters: whom should we hire? Yes, Masai found a Nick Nurse, but what other team does that? Call me when Eric Spoelstra's available.
 
1. Leaving Caldwell-Pope open might be the least of available evils.
2. Hezonja WAS held accountable for his bonehead moves. Then we lost half the team and are effectively forced to play him because all our guys get 5 fouls on them.

All the Stotts-haters: whom should we hire? Yes, Masai found a Nick Nurse, but what other team does that? Call me when Eric Spoelstra's available.
That Masai guy is good at finding hidden gems, be they players or coaches. Can we find another guy like him?
 
I dislike Stotts a lot, but who are you replacing him with?


what's that old saying about 'insanity it doing the same thing over and over while expecting a different result'...? something like that

if Stotts is failing, what difference does it make if the new coach fails too? It's still failure either way. And the thing is, there have been 8 years of Stotts; he's been coach for over 700 games now. That's not a small sample size. The new guy might fail but he also might succeed where Stotts has failed. I really don't see a significant downside...assuming of course you think Stotts is failing or even just mediocre

I'm not saying Stotts is failing either....just saying that there are plenty of valid criticisms of Stotts and those criticisms are based upon an extensive record
 
what's that old saying about 'insanity it doing the same thing over and over while expecting a different result'...? something like that

if Stotts is failing, what difference does it make if the new coach fails too? It's still failure either way. And the thing is, there have been 8 years of Stotts; he's been coach for over 700 games now. That's not a small sample size. The new guy might fail but he also might succeed where Stotts has failed. I really don't see a significant downside...assuming of course you think Stotts is failing or even just mediocre

I'm not saying Stotts is failing either....just saying that there are plenty of valid criticisms of Stotts and those criticisms are based upon an extensive record
You go on and on saying he is failing then say “I’m not saying he’s failing”.
 
You go on and on saying he is failing then say “I’m not saying he’s failing”.

no...I said "if" he is failing...then this & that

I also said that those who are saying he is failing have valid reasons for their criticisms

personally, I think he is an above average offensive coach and a below average defensive coach. He also seems to be a player's coach. So, on balance he's probably a little above average (but you could argue he's been saddled with bollixed rosters). In other words, Portland could do worse, but they shouldn't let the fear of doing worse keep them from trying to do better
 
no...I said "if" he is failing...then this & that

I also said that those who are saying he is failing have valid reasons for their criticisms

personally, I think he is an above average offensive coach and a below average defensive coach. He also seems to be a player's coach. So, on balance he's probably a little above average. In other words, Portland could do worse, but they shouldn't let the fear of doing worse keep them from trying to do better
Hm. I think if you read that post - and your other posts - it seems like you are saying there is a lot of failing going on. Anyway, whatever.
 
We have the highest payroll in the league (AGAIN) and no matter who we add, it looks like Dame against the world.

  • We need a better big man that can facilitate. - Enter Nurkic....but that doesn't seem to make much difference.
  • We need a wing that can shoot. - Enter HoF'er Melo (passed his prime but still knocking down shots) and Trent who is shooting the lights out this year....but we can't seem to get any shots for.
  • We need another playmaker that can take the pressure off Dame. - Does anyone remember what CJ does when Dame is out? So it's certainly not for a lack of ability to be able to do that.

Yet.....

Makes you wonder, doesn't it?
 
I don't agree that Stotts is bad at developing young players. In hindsight it's obvious Anf should have gone to college for a couple of years; to build a solid base of skills and confidence in himself. I don't think he was thrown in the fire this year; it looked like he was ready. But he's another undersized (both in height and girth) SG who just hasn't produced. Hezonja has failed with numerous teams. Collins still undetermined what he could be. Trent, Nurk, Lillard and CJ all young guys who developed into good players; although on three of the four you might say it's their drive to excel that did it. And two of them were top ten picks with four years of college. Now I am losing my energy for this; everything seems so complicated! :)

If you believe STotts is OK at developing young players, then the obvious follow up is that Olshey is incompetent at finding players to develop!

It might be both, but we can't prtend it is neither! If Simons, or Little, or Gabriel, or Hoard were legit NBA players, would lack of depth be killing us?
 
1. Leaving Caldwell-Pope open might be the least of available evils.
2. Hezonja WAS held accountable for his bonehead moves. Then we lost half the team and are effectively forced to play him because all our guys get 5 fouls on them.

All the Stotts-haters: whom should we hire? Yes, Masai found a Nick Nurse, but what other team does that? Call me when Eric Spoelstra's available.

So, not only is the current team weak, there is no path to improvement? That's a depressing point-of-view!
 
I know we don't live in that reality but I'd take Hood, Ariza, Collins and Dame's finger over those two any day of the week.

I still don't think the series is over though, but if it is, I think what they were able to accomplish (with this style of play) in the bubble was impressive. They've been missing two to three important pieces all year (at the moment three) and that's hard to overcome against the #1 seed.

This just doesn't feel like a "blow it all up" defeat if they lose the series.
We dont have to blow it up, we just need to fire Stotts.
 
Just out of interest - what team do you think WOULD be beating the Lakers right now?
 
The fact that we're even in the playoffs is a fucking miracle. And then we took a game from the odds-on favorite for the title. Jeez, what do people want? I bet there was a post JUST LIKE this one on some Lakers board after they lost game one.

Imagine what Denver fans are saying right now.
Add Clippers fans to that.
 
Sorry to burst your bubble but they would by up 2-1 with Hood, Ariza and throw in Collins. I have no doubt. They played the whole year dinged up. We are guarding lebron James with Carmelo Anthony! That should be Ariza or Hood. Olshey isn’t perfect but he isn’t going anywhere and he shouldn’t. I don’t care what they do with Stotts.
Would LA have their full roster too? As one of the best on ball defenders in the league, Bradley would be slowing down Dame. Rondo has given PDX fits for years as well. No coaching can cover up for the fact that Portland needs more talent (especially at both forward spots) if they're to compete.

STOMP
 
Would LA have their full roster too? As one of the best on ball defenders in the league, Bradley would be slowing down Dame. Rondo has given PDX fits for years as well. No coaching can cover up for the fact that Portland needs more talent (especially at both forward spots) if they're to compete.

STOMP
I’d gladly add Hood, Ariza and Collins and give them Rondo and Bradley vs what we are seeing now.
 
Just out of interest - what team do you think WOULD be beating the Lakers right now?

If you will re-read the original post, he ranted not about one loss, but about unchanging bonehead flaws which have been with us since the advent of Stotts and Olshey.
 
Would LA have their full roster too? As one of the best on ball defenders in the league, Bradley would be slowing down Dame. Rondo has given PDX fits for years as well. No coaching can cover up for the fact that Portland needs more talent (especially at both forward spots) if they're to compete.

STOMP
But wait? You mean to tell me Portland has less talent than the Lakers?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top