My Game 4 loss rant

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

PCmor7

Generational Poster
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
8,045
Likes
11,950
Points
113
No point in waiting.

Just repeat everything in my Game 3 loss rant.

Add to it that as much as I wish I could write otherwise, this team won't make the playoffs next year. With the Griz, Suns and Pels coming on, and I doubt the Spurs and Warriors have another down year, we're probably 13th in the West.

The organization needs to bring in a GM who is a genius to undo the mess that is a roster lacking in both talent and chemistry and give Dame a chance to have decent personnel around him in the next 5 years or the Blazers need to accept that Dame is the one tradeable commodity on this roster to get competitive again in the near future. It's one or the other and probably both.

But we owe it to Dame, if we can't find a way to put complementary players around him that help him thrive and prolong his career, to trade him somewhere that will.

This roster ... yeesh ... I'm not sure what is worse, the lack of talent or lack of chemistry. No depth whatsoever.

I stood by Stotts as long as I could. He needs to go.

Unfortunately, with this abbreviated offseason and a first-year owner, there's no way we change GM or coach and we probably don't change either, and the Blazers are going to drop from mediocrity to obscurity. If you think it was hard to get free agents before, wait until we start losing.

BTW, Gary Trent = OK player. I think the people who think he'd be any kind of suitable replacement for CJ or a starting off-guard on a contending team see something I definitely don't see. I see a guy who plays hard, can come off the bench and get streaky from 3. But you better have a couple of other players on the team that draw defensive attention and at least a really great ballhandler at the point and an unusually good ballhandler at the 3 because he's not going to handle the basketball and facilitate.

Anyway, sorry to be blunt. That's not what I want to see, but that's what I see.
 
Look on the bright side. At least we are #1 in team payroll this season, $139 million. The Lakers are only a puny #17.

We're #1 ! Say it loud and say it proud !
 
The worst part of the Blazers being blown out again is it almost makes me wish the Suns had gotten in. Perhaps they would have presented more of a challenge.

sad to see the ream looking so outclassed.
 
The worst part of the Blazers being blown out again is it almost makes me wish the Suns had gotten in. Perhaps they would have presented more of a challenge.

sad to see the ream looking so outclassed.

We're getting reamed and creamed.
 
I think it's officially time to make wholesale changes to the team. Everybody except for Dame is on the table. Unfortunately I have almost zero confidence that this will actually happen. Neil Oshley is enamored with our roster as it is constructed and is seemingly convinced that it is destined for championship contention.
 
Okay there's time. Cut 38 point lead to 25. Time to shock the world (and this board).
 
Stotts gotta get fired and whole team besides dame needs to be blown out
 
If that happens Dame may ask to be traded. He goes down with the ship.

I think we have to accept that might happen and just deal with it. If we are making an effort to put a better team around him and he doesn't want it, it's kind of pointless for him to be here. If we don't see a way to put a competitive team around him and try to send him to a team where he could experience that and he doesn't like it, it really doesn't matter.
 
The worst part of the Blazers being blown out again is it almost makes me wish the Suns had gotten in. Perhaps they would have presented more of a challenge.

sad to see the ream looking so outclassed.

Does anyone honestly think the Suns take (1) game against the Lakers like we did? Come on.
 
Does anyone honestly think the Suns take (1) game against the Lakers like we did? Come on.

That's your barometer for success against the Lakers?

How about this: Does anyone think the Suns would have won at least one of the first four games in the series and not lost twice by 20 points?
 
I think the Lakers are very beatable. We just lack sufficient talent. With Ariza and Collins, I think this would be an entirely different series.

But yeah, if we start next season with CJ I think I'm going to take a break from basketball. We have to trade him for a talent upgrade at forward.
 
I’m still wondering on what the barometer is for success is?
Not sure this year could really be included in any metric? It’s been a pretty rough go.
 
Olshey has done a pretty good job at finding talent. Just not at retaining it. Imagine if we still had hark,curry,kanter...and we let some decent backup pgs go
 
I think the Lakers are very beatable. We just lack sufficient talent. With Ariza and Collins, I think this would be an entirely different series.

But yeah, if we start next season with CJ I think I'm going to take a break from basketball. We have to trade him for a talent upgrade at forward.
Wait, you're saying that we need to trade CJ for a talent upgrade at forward, but you're also saying that if our existing forwards were available we'd be good enough to challenge if not beat the 1 seed? There seems to be a contradiction in logic there. Can you help reconcile that for me?
 
Wait, you're saying that we need to trade CJ for a talent upgrade at forward, but you're also saying that if our existing forwards were available we'd be good enough to challenge if not beat the 1 seed? There seems to be a contradiction in logic there. Can you help reconcile that for me?

I don't think the Lakers are that great of a team. If we were healthy, I think this would have been a very competitive series. But even if our injured players were back, our redundant back court and our mediocrity at forward would have meant a loss in the next round anyway. The Dame and CJ experiment ran its course a while ago. It's time to move on.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top