Nas - 4 year / 28M

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
4 yrs/$28m is a fantastic get. Considering OG got 4 yrs/$72m after averaging 11/5/2 (he’s was healthier his first three years, I get it), getting Nas for almost 1/3 of that deal is pretty much as good as you can get.
 
So refreshing to see the Blazers not over paid on an extension for once.

Remember we gave out 4 yr/ 40 mil to each of Mo Harkless and Meyers Leonard? That was 2016, 6 years ago.

This is how it should work. Nas gets lift changing guaranty money. The team is taking on minimum risk. win/win. Great job on the GM.
 
Idog1976 said:
Wow! Nas is a vastly better defender than Westbrick, especially old Westbrick. That's one of the worst comps I've seen on here.
Click to expand...
Can’t even beat Hart for the starting position
 
DDolla said:
Nas is like an older Russell Westbrook. No handles, can’t shoot the 3’s, out of control and try to bully himself towards the rim.
Click to expand...
You just compared a freak athlete 22 year old injury prone wing role player, that has made this money through effort and things beyond the boxscore to a pretty durable 33 year old PG MVP who is one of the two biggest empty stat stuffers in the history of the game (Harden being the other).

This solidifies my opinion that you don't know what the fuck you're talking about... your constantly changing negative takes had me leaning that way but this doesn't even fall under trolling, it's just pure ignorance.
 
blazerkor said:
You just compared a freak athlete 22 year old injury prone wing role player, that has made this money through effort and things beyond the boxscore to a pretty durable 33 year old PG MVP who is one of the two biggest empty stat stuffers in the history of the game (Harden being the other).
Click to expand...
Freak athlete? @Ed O just told us that he's not especially athletic. Now I don't know what to believe!
 
PtldPlatypus said:
Freak athlete? @Ed O just told us that he's not especially athletic. Now I don't know what to believe!
Click to expand...
https://www.nba.com/stats/draft/combine-strength-agility

So his lane agility is subpar but his leaping ability and speed tests are elite for a guy with his size and I've never seen a problem with his lateral quickness, in fact it looks elite in game so I'd chalk the combine score up to a lack of skill in that drill instead of what the drill is supposed to measure.
 
I think this is a great deal for all involved, but especially for the team if Nas can stay healthy and reach even some of his potential. He has got to work on his handle and especially his 3-ball. There is a very real chance this will be one of the best Wing contracts in the league after the next deal. A very solid and fair contract for both parties, but let's be real it's a great signing for the team! It's also a great salary size for a trade.
 
Jelloman said:
So refreshing to see the Blazers not over paid on an extension for once.

Remember we gave out 4 yr/ 40 mil to each of Mo Harkless and Meyers Leonard? That was 2016, 6 years ago.

This is how it should work. Nas gets lift changing guaranty money. The team is taking on minimum risk. win/win. Great job on the GM.
Click to expand...
Nobody did a great job. Bro has been TOO injured to have any value to any other teams around the league. Great contract for us I guess, but he wasn’t going to get that offer from anybody else.
 
DDolla said:
Nas is like an older Russell Westbrook. No handles, can’t shoot the 3’s, out of control and try to bully himself towards the rim.
Click to expand...
You really thought you were onto something with this comp LOL.

For the record though, this current Westbrook at $7m/yr is by no means unmovable. There are teams that would want him at $7m/yr.
 
This was a good deal for the Blazers cause even if Little does not get any better he is still moveable in a trade cause some team will want to take a chance on potential even if it's waning. Now to all the "fans " and going to use that term loosely who are ripping this deal apart and such your entitled to this opinion even bad one's so do not feel bad for not knowing a damn thing you have time to learn.

GO Blazers
 
wizenheimer said:
As someone said ... it's a contract that matches his upside while accounting for his injury history. And if nothing else, it will become a fairly tradeable contract and decent salary filler in a larger trade. Also, considering he's making 4.2M this season, and his 1st year salary of the extension is probably somewhere in the 6M range, trading him this season, if it comes to that, won't carry any significant BYC differential. Although, maybe with the extension he can't be traded this season? ... anybody know?

All things considered I probably like Little's 4 year deal more than the deals for Ant and Nurk
Click to expand...

Teams need tradable contracts. Little has upside -- and until the preseason revealed he's not yet back to form from injury and surgery, Little was being touted as the likely starting SF [not by everyone ... just around half]. Now, he's locked in for this and four more years in a contract that is easily paired with others to make a bigger trade. Hart's player option contract makes him the most likely traded by the deadline, but when Little can be traded, add him to the list. If he pans out as a stud 6th man, then they got him on the cheap. Very PJ Tucker. If he actually becomes a starting SF, then he's like the woefully underpaid Sam Cassell (PG) and early Scottie Pippen. [Okay, not to their quality but a starter making less than MLE money is practically theft]. Little is covered in case of ongoing injuries while the Blazers just got a really good contract signed. Locking in Nurkic's 4 year contract was iffy at best. Nas? Great job!
 
I think Chief and Ed Davis each signed with us for 8 million a year back in the day....for Nas at 22...it's understandable he got the deal he got..it's based on "potential" ..Ed and Chief were vets for similar money. He's easier to trade this way if he doesn't pan out and you don't have to bring back a ton of salary to move him if that's the idea down the road.
 
For those who are out on him strictly because of injuries and not ability, think about it this way:

All we pretty much did was re-up on his rookie contract. Sharpe will only be making around $1m less than Nas for the entirety of his rookie deal.

Others have mentioned the AFA and EdD contracts being around the same price or more. This was a no-brainer deal for sure.
 
This has potential to be a very good deal for Portland. Also, if Naz was as good as a lot of people here want to believe he is, him nor his agent would sign this contract.

It's going to take some time, but this appears to be a fairl low risk deal.
 
AmirIcon said:
Great deal. I'm a big believer of Nas. Silly to judge him on what he is right now. He just started playing 5 on 5.
Click to expand...
I think it’s silly to NOT judge him where he is right now. Dudes had like what 3 years to prove himself.
 
THE HCP said:
I think it’s silly to NOT judge him where he is right now. Dudes had like what 3 years to prove himself.
Click to expand...

Now im not saying compare his skills or talent to steph, but remember steph currys injury history out of the gate?
Just saying shit can turn when its not a reaccuring thing
 
BlazerBender said:
Now im not saying compare his skills or talent to steph, but remember steph currys injury history out of the gate?
Just saying shit can turn when its not a reaccuring thing
Click to expand...
If you don’t want me to compare them, don’t bring Steph up. Find a player that isn’t a hall of Famer to compare with please.
 
I think Little has star potential if he can work on his handle and of course the biggest thing is stay healthy.

I love the deal. It’s a bargain.
 
MickZagger said:
I think Little has star potential if he can work on his handle and of course the biggest thing is stay healthy.

I love the deal. It’s a bargain.
Click to expand...
Agree with this whole post minus the usage of the word “star”. He could be a great role player. And lucky for us he will be paid like one.
 
blazerkor said:
https://www.nba.com/stats/draft/combine-strength-agility

So his lane agility is subpar but his leaping ability and speed tests are elite for a guy with his size and I've never seen a problem with his lateral quickness, in fact it looks elite in game so I'd chalk the combine score up to a lack of skill in that drill instead of what the drill is supposed to measure.
Click to expand...
To be clear: I don't think he's elite for the NBA. Of course he's elite for the general population. :)

And yeah, while his lane agility time is not necessarily determinative (he might not have trained for it, or he might have had a bad day, or it may just not be indicative of actual athleticism), he was also middle of the pack in that group for shuttle run and 15th or so in the 3/4 court sprint... he is a good jumper, but that's about it as far as impressive athleticism goes. And watching him in game action, he doesn't look like an especially athletic player. Of course that is the eye of the beholder to some extent.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top