Nate-a-like fired

[OddEnormous]

Ah, the old attack the other poster routine. Typical.

Try harder.

Try harder?

You cant understand a simple bit of sarcasm.

I'd ask you to try harder, but it seems a bridge too far.

 

[RoyToy]

Seriously though, what's up with your left shoe?

Apparently there's a massive sole.

 

[OddEnormous]

Apparently there's a massive sole.

Eye patch with cotton underneath it too I bet.

 

[RoyToy]

Try harder?

You cant understand a simple bit of sarcasm.

I'd ask you to try harder, but it seems a bridge too far.

Consistency is key. Keep going.

 

[MrSelfDestruct]

Not a troll.

NateBishop3 wanting the team to fail so he'd be "right" about McDillon plays no role in his judgment of troll/not-troll.

Interesting you remember that, since that comment was made about 4 months before you registered.

You must have been a lurker.

 

[OddEnormous]

Consistency is key. Keep going.

Oh the ironing....

 

[BGrantFan]

Interesting you remember that, since that comment was made about 4 months before you registered.

You must have been a lurker.

It was linked to me a few months ago by another poster, Sherlock. I found it humorous, considering the actions of who I consider to be the weak-link mod on this board. He even PMs me to criticize me.

Too thin-skinned to be a mod? Logic says yes?

 

[BGrantFan]

Oh the ironing....

The ironing is delicious.

 

[barfo]

It was linked to me a few months ago by another poster, Sherlock. I found it humorous, considering the actions of who I consider to be the weak-link mod on this board. He even PMs me to criticize me.

I do not!

barfo

 

[OddEnormous]

It was linked to me a few months ago by another poster, Sherlock. I found it humorous, considering the actions of who I consider to be the weak-link mod on this board. He even PMs me to criticize me.

Too thin-skinned to be a mod? Logic says yes?

Pure banter

 

[The_Lillard_King]

LOLZ!!!!

J/K dudes, he's nothing like Nate. This guy actually managed to WIN a playoff series.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=5188712

Before reading the rest of the thread I thought I would stop here because the Atlanta coach wasn't fired (contrary to the title) and Nate has won a playoff series (contrary to the post).

So I'm guessing this whole thread went down a wrong path because it started out with wrong facts . . .

 

[Mediocre Man]

Before reading the rest of the thread I thought I would stop here because the Atlanta coach wasn't fired (contrary to the title) and Nate has won a playoff series (contrary to the post).

So I'm guessing this whole thread went down a wrong path because it started out with wrong facts . . .

I think most people who work contract jobs, that have the option of being picked up would consider themselves fired if it wasn't picked up. They didn't like him enough to employ him any longer period.


As for Nate winning a playoff series, he is referring to here, in Portland.

 

[The_Lillard_King]

I think most people who work contract jobs, that have the option of being picked up would consider themselves fired if it wasn't picked up. They didn't like him enough to employ him any longer period.


As for Nate winning a playoff series, he is referring to here, in Portland.

I guess so . . . but for an OP, he kind of slaughter it. One would think that if you are starting a thread, you would either try to be more acurate with the title or more clear in the original text.

Also, being fired mean the team has to still pay you. I think it is a much more slap in the face to say we are letting you go even though your contract is not up and we have to pay you . .. you suck and we can't afford you as a coach even if it cost us financially.

That compared to deciding to go a different direction once the coach's contract ends . . . seems different to me, but I agrre they do both say we don't want you anymore (one is a slap in the face and get out and the other is a handshake and thanks for the memories)