Nate, Lee or Both?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

What Should the Knicks Do?

  • Re-sign Nate

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Re-sign Lee

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    5

Mr. J

Triple Up
Joined
Aug 25, 2004
Messages
9,912
Likes
19
Points
38
Should the Knicks lock up Nate Lee or both of them when their contracts expire?
 
I voted 'keep both'. The team will be completely flushed out in 2010, especially if Curry declines his last option year. The remaining team should include those two plus Chandler and Gallinari.
 
I voted 'keep both'. The team will be completely flushed out in 2010, especially if Curry declines his last option year. The remaining team should include those two plus Chandler and Gallinari.

Why would Curry turn down his last big paycheck? I really think they should trade one, and it has to be Nate Robinson over Lee IMO. Lee is a stud and legitimate PF while Nate Robinson will forever be a 5'9" SG.
 
Nate has been outplaying Lee though. 16/4/4 off the bench puts him in contention for 6th Man of the Year.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top