My big beef with Nate is that the team rarely recognized a 2-for-1 or a foul-to-give opportunity at the end of quarters. And that's down to coaching if it became a pattern, which it did.
With that said, I'm coming around on his overall abilities. When I saw that article last year (I think it was SI or USA Today) that broke down coaches and talked about teams' overall efficiency coming out of timeouts, I was shocked to see that Nate and the Blazers were leading that category by leaps and bounds over #2. You gotta give him a lot of credit for that, with a young team.
I just want to see him harp on those 2-for-1's and fouls-to-give. Momentum is huge at the end of a quarter, and too often last year we'd squander opportunities to either capture it or prevent the other team from getting it.
-Pop