<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (danxcr @ Jul 27 2008, 03:42 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (pegs @ Jul 27 2008, 03:20 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>No games played, no scoring. There's a vote among peers to judge whose team is the best.</div>
vote based on what? starters? bench? role players? 6th man? superstars?
</div>
Based on the team as a whole, of course. Based on how good the players are, how well the players fit in with each other, how good the teams' identity is and how well the players fit that identity, etc.
Posters get to explain to their peers why they feel their team is the best. They get to state their case, and a poll is formed.
I believe the last full GM Draft I did (from start till end), There was first 2 polls: Eastern Conference and Western Conference. Players vote in the teams that get into the "playoffs" - as in, they vote for who they feel are the top 8 teams in each conference. Then, match-ups are formed, similar to the real playoffs. Everyone gets to vote who they feel is better between to teams in a match-up, and whichever team wins gets to go onto the next round, up against another team that won.
Eventually, it's down to two teams, and whichever team wins that match-up, wins the draft.
In each poll you're involved in, you're able to state your case as to why your team is better.