NBA trade and Free Agent rumors (1 Viewer)

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Haynes just tweeted this :

On Mo Williams front, told the free agent guard has no meetings set with other teams: "His only goal is to get something done with #Blazers"

Looks like the ball is in the Blazers court and unless Mo's demands are not reasonable then i would count on him being a Blazer again. I know this would not please some fans but i think he is a good fit so after he re-signs this will leave the MLE (5.3m) and BAE (2m~)

While all true, we would have to cut a player to use both those exceptions if we are resigning Mo without using one. Claver maybe? Like the guy but he is not a great fit with our coach.

With all the SG-types we have it actually needs to be Crabbe but I don't see POR giving up so quick when they gave up 2nds for him.
 
I'm really hoping we acquire a wing through trade. Ariza would be a great addition. I wonder what he expects to make and what Washington would want in a trade.
 
But Mo got all those minutes because there was literally nobody else to play them. Next season we should HOPEFULLY have CJ in the rotation. And I think that Will has earned some consistent minutes. Plus there's always a chance we will sign a wing, so I don't think there's going to be the minutes available that were there last season.

As far as I'm concerned those guys aren't better than Chalmers, so no reason to give them minutes over Chalmers

Will is... Will

CJ is an undersized 2 guard and not that great of a defender
 
As far as I'm concerned those guys aren't better than Chalmers, so no reason to give them minutes over Chalmers

Will is... Will

CJ is an undersized 2 guard and not that great of a defender

It seems to me that you've written off CJ much too quickly though. I like Chalmers, but come on... he's a role player. He's not a star, and I wouldn't expect him to score much. We still need scoring off our bench, and CJ is a scorer.
 
Haynes just tweeted this :

On Mo Williams front, told the free agent guard has no meetings set with other teams: "His only goal is to get something done with #Blazers"

Looks like the ball is in the Blazers court and unless Mo's demands are not reasonable then i would count on him being a Blazer again. I know this would not please some fans but i think he is a good fit so after he re-signs this will leave the MLE (5.3m) and BAE (2m~)
Could we resign Mo and still have the MLE?
 
Hmm... that's roughly the BAE, right?

I think he gets a 20% raise over what he got last year. I hope we got that route but he may balk. If he does, you of course would say move on. POR may not unfortunately. Lets just hope the small raise works for him.
 
A little higher. But also I think BAE can only be 2 years. I'd have to double check that one though

Well, I think everyone knows how much I dislike Mo's game, but if he can be retained without using the MLE or BAE, I say do it. He's an asset. The MLE needs to be used on a difference maker.
 
Well, I think everyone knows how much I dislike Mo's game, but if he can be retained without using the MLE or BAE, I say do it. He's an asset. The MLE needs to be used on a difference maker.
Agreed. I actually liked mo on the team, personally. I dint want to use the MLE on him though. Not a good use of assets
 
Well, I think everyone knows how much I dislike Mo's game, but if he can be retained without using the MLE or BAE, I say do it. He's an asset. The MLE needs to be used on a difference maker.

I'd really like to see us get Hawes, if we can't get him for the MLE a sign and trade with CLE could work
 
Agreed. I actually liked mo on the team, personally. I dint want to use the MLE on him though. Not a good use of assets

No, and that's too much. More than he's worth. I think he's worth about that 3 million. I would offer 9 million over three years. That's it.
 
I'd really like to see us get Hawes, if we can't get him for the MLE a sign and trade with CLE could work

It just all depends on how much he wants. Either Hawes or Frye would be a great addition to our bench. Hawes might want to start though.
 
No, and that's too much. More than he's worth. I think he's worth about that 3 million. I would offer 9 million over three years. That's it.

frankly the other PG options are not much better, if better at all, allowing us to use the MLE and BAE elsewhere is a pretty decent option
 
It just all depends on how much he wants. Either Hawes or Frye would be a great addition to our bench. Hawes might want to start though.

An LMA/Hawes/Rolo primary rotation I think would giver everyone plenty of minutes
 
frankly the other PG options are not much better, if better at all, allowing us to use the MLE and BAE elsewhere is a pretty decent option

Well, I disagree simply because I think someone like Shaun Livingston would be great next to Dame. But with the addition of Livingston, we would have to find scoring somewhere else.

I would LOVE to add Livingston and Stuckey to our bench.
 
Could we resign Mo and still have the MLE?

Yes. Using the non-bird exception, we can re-sign Mo to 120% of his previous salary without using the MLE or BAE.
http://www.cbafaq.com/salarycap.htm#Q25

His previous salary was $$2,771,340, so we could pay him up to $3,325,608.

Since I'm not a huge Mo fan, another option is to use this as a S&T for other teams that are over the cap, but under the tax level.
 
Well, I disagree simply because I think someone like Shaun Livingston would be great next to Dame. But with the addition of Livingston, we would have to find scoring somewhere else.

I would LOVE to add Livingston and Stuckey to our bench.

CJ, and a starter.

Put Will in for Wes early in the first and 3rd and bring Wes back with the 2nd unit as a SF around the start of the 2nd and 4th.
Or take Nic out early and slide Wes over while bringing Nic back with the 2nd unit.

With the taller Livingston, CJ can guard the back up PGs. He will replace Mo's scoring while we get better PG production from Livingston, which in turn will help players such as Trob also score more.
 
CJ, and a starter.

Put Will in for Wes early in the first and 3rd and bring Wes back with the 2nd unit as a SF around the start of the 2nd and 4th.
Or take Nic out early and slide Wes over while bringing Nic back with the 2nd unit.

With the taller Livingston, CJ can guard the back up PGs. He will replace Mo's scoring while we get better PG production from Livingston, which in turn will help players such as Trob also score more.

That's definitely why I want the taller Livingston. I think he and Dame would be great together.
 
This is all well and good, but what team would want to trade for him that isn't already over the tax threshold?

Probably a limited amount of "buyers" for sure. It would have to be a team that:
- is over the CAP, but under the tax level.
- wants to use the MLE on another free agent.
- BAE is not available or they want to use it on another free agent.
- needs a backup point guard.

Memphis is one team that looks like they are over the CAP. Since they just signed Zach, and did not offer Ed Davis the QO, they will be a bit under the TAX level. They do not have the BAE available this year. They have no backup point guard currently on their roster. The only options they have are the MLE, S&T, or vet min offers.

They currently have 3 shooting guards on their roster: Courtny Lee, Tony Allen and Nick Calathes. I'd take Tony Allen ($4,831,461) back in a S&T for Mo if they were up for that. They would balance their roster a bit by adding depth to the PG spot, and cut about $1.5M of salary to be able to better use the MLE without going over the tax level.
 
Im not to dissapointed if mo returns and we dont get another PG. None of the ones on the market really stand out and id like Livingston but Livingston cant shoot the three to save his life and thats big for us especially if we have two other non shooters on the floor at the same time. Chalmers would be an upgrade over Mo defense wise but is a worse shooter and passer and there is real concern on if he could actually run a team or a bench unit.
 
I would love to sign Chalmers for the MLE and then do a sign-and-trade for someone like Ariza.

Which starter do we get rid of? I'd rather keep Batum and Wes but I could see an argument for getting rid of one of them.

There is zero chance Ariza could be a backup behind both those two from a playing time or payroll perspective.

Chalmers opponent PER - 13.6

I'd love to get Chalmers as a backup PG but that stat is very misleading. Its due to the Heat team defense with Lebron. Chalmers is a good defender but he isn't holding guys to a PER like that on his own.

The same way Mo got 25 min a game, except Chalmers would actually deserve them

All this said, I could see him ending up starting for Houston if they don't land a star. He'd really help solidify that group.

Someone is going to get this guy and be a better team for it.

First off no way Chalmers starts in front of Beverly, he's a hero down there. If Houston doesn't get a star why would the want another PG with Beverly, Lin and Harden all there?

Ira Winderman @IraHeatBeat
Why Norris Cole's $2M could be dealt for cap space: The likes of Jameer Nelson now there possibly for the vet minimum.

Actually a smart move for the Heat

Sheesh, the minimum? I know he has declined but that's surprising! There are so many damn PG's on the free market this offseason tons of guys will be available after a few weeks for near minimum contracts. I'd like to see the Blazers grab another position with the full MLE.

I'm really hoping we acquire a wing through trade. Ariza would be a great addition. I wonder what he expects to make and what Washington would want in a trade.

I'll be shocked if he makes less than $9 million a season. Half the teams have major cap space this offseason and there's hardly any starting level available free agents. He likely makes $12+ million a year. We'd probably have to give up a starter and a future first round pick which is a terrible move.

Could we resign Mo and still have the MLE?

Only if he accepts a contract starting just over $3 million. So we can give him about $10 million over 3 years. More than that and we have to use our MLE.

I'd really like to see us get Hawes, if we can't get him for the MLE a sign and trade with CLE could work

Yeah I think he goes for more then the MLE but if he were willing to take it I'd bite. Not sure if I'd want to do a sign and trade because then he'd be on our cap for a larger contract and we'd have to give up some sort of asset. At that point I think we'd be overpaying for a bench player so I'd pass. Definetely an option worth thinking about though.

Well, I disagree simply because I think someone like Shaun Livingston would be great next to Dame. But with the addition of Livingston, we would have to find scoring somewhere else.

I would LOVE to add Livingston and Stuckey to our bench.

I'm a big Livingston fan... but with Stotts offense being so reliand on 3 point shooting I think he'd be a bad fit here. He worked best in a small ball lineup with Paul Pierce at PF shooting threes. Here he'd have one or two of Lopez, Trob, Freeland in the game with him. I hate to pass on Livingston but it'd be best for us get Collision or Chalmers if we had the pick of backup PG's.

This is all well and good, but what team would want to trade for him that isn't already over the tax threshold?

There could be quite a few of them. Miami, Indy if Lance leaves, Chicago, LAC, Golden State.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top