I clipped this from:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Effects_of_the_Chernobyl_disaster
TORCH report
In 2006
German Green Party Member of the European Parliament Rebecca Harms commissioned two UK scientists for an alternate report (
TORCH,
The
Other
Report on
CHernobyl) in response to the UN report. The report included areas not covered by the Chernobyl forum report, and also lower radiation doses. It predicted about 30,000 to 60,000 excess cancer deaths and warned that predictions of excess cancer deaths strongly depend on the risk factor used, and urged more research stating that large uncertainties made it difficult to properly assess the full scale of the disaster. This report is not free of controversy, and has been accused of trying to maximize the consequences of the accident.
Greenpeace
Demonstration on Chernobyl day near
WHO in
Geneva
Greenpeace claimed contradictions in the Chernobyl Forum reports, quoting a 1998 WHO study referenced in the 2005 report, which projected 212 dead from 72,000
liquidators. In its report, Greenpeace suggested there will be 270,000 cases of cancer attributable to Chernobyl fallout, and that 93,000 of these will probably be fatal, but state in their report that "The most recently published figures indicate that in Belarus, Russia and Ukraine alone the accident could have resulted in an estimated 200,000 additional deaths in the period between 1990 and 2004." Blake Lee-Harwood, campaigns director at Greenpeace, believes that cancer was likely to be the cause of less than half of the final fatalities and that "intestinal problems, heart and circulation problems, respiratory problems,
endocrine problems, and particularly effects on the
immune system," will also cause fatalities. However, concern has been expressed about the methods used in compiling the