Nets not done.

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
I'll be so jealous if the Nets get Miller. He would have been the perfect SF for LA.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jizzy @ Feb 19 2008, 03:28 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>someone posted this:


vc to the knicks for fred jones, Balkman, malik rose</div>
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (huevonkiller @ Feb 19 2008, 03:33 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I'll be so jealous if the Nets get Miller. He would have been the perfect SF for LA.</div>

You guys have Gasol. Let's not get greedy.
 
You Guys are all talking about the 2010 FA class, but still everybody wants to trade VC.

I say let's keep VC, and trade RJ for JO, then we really have a lot's of space in the 2010 offseason.

If we can get Mike Miller for KVH and Boki, the next step will have to be not VC, but RJ (+Magloire+Krstic+Marcus) For JO.

Then we can have:
Harris/Armstrong
VC/Ager
Miller/Hassell
Jo/Stro
Boone/Sean.

This lineup works way better than RJ in place of VC... Mike Miller would flourish with VC, While VC would have an easier job because of JO. And VC can still give our athletic bigs som easy dunks with his great passing, - something that we would totally miss if we kept RJ instead of VC.

We really don' want to extend Nenad for 8-10 mill a year do we? Then it's better to trade him now..

Then we don't pick up VC's option, and let JO expirer, and we have a great young and cheap core too in 2010.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (fefe @ Feb 19 2008, 03:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>You Guys are all talking about the 2010 FA class, but still everybody wants to trade VC.

I say let's keep VC, and trade RJ for JO, then we really have a lot's of space in the 2010 offseason.

If we can get Mike Miller for KVH and Boki, the next step will have to be not VC, but RJ (+Magloire+Krstic+Marcus) For JO.

Then we can have:
Harris/Armstrong
VC/Ager
Miller/Hassell
Jo/Stro
Boone/Sean.

This lineup works way better than RJ in place of VC... Mike Miller would flourish with VC, While VC would have an easier job because of JO. And VC can still give our athletic bigs som easy dunks with his great passing, - something that we would totally miss if we kept RJ instead of VC.

We really don' want to extend Nenad for 8-10 mill a year do we? Then it's better to trade him now..

Then we don't pick up VC's option, and let JO expirer, and we have a great young and cheap core too in 2010.</div>
You can't combine players who have already been traded in another trade...they can only be traded individually.

For clarity these are the players who can be combined in trades:
Vince
RJ
Marcus
DA
Boki
Sean
Boone
Nenad
Mags

Thats it...every other player can only be traded if they are sent alone.

Therefore your Mike Miller proposal doesnt work...
the rumor is Boki, Mags, DA and a first for the record.

As for trading RJ making more sense...nope.
RJ's contract is up in 2010...Carter's is a year longer..til 2011.
which means we wouldn't have the salary cap space we want to sign players if we sent RJ to the Pacers instead of Vince.
Vince's option is for 2012.

If we keep RJ, get Miller and Oneal than we will clear approximately 52 million from our cap the summer than Lebron, Dwayne Wade and Chris Bosh become free agents.

in short...
<span style="color:#FF0000"><span style="font-size:24pt;line-height:100%">YOUR WRONG! </span></span>
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jloc857 @ Feb 19 2008, 04:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><span style="color:#FF0000"><span style="font-size:24pt;line-height:100%">YOUR WRONG! </span></span></div>

you're
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (RUstrong @ Feb 19 2008, 05:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jloc857 @ Feb 19 2008, 04:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><span style="color:#ff0000"><span style="font-size:24pt;line-height:100%">YOUR WRONG! </span></span></div>

you're
</div>

 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (RUstrong @ Feb 19 2008, 05:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jloc857 @ Feb 19 2008, 04:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><span style="color:#FF0000"><span style="font-size:24pt;line-height:100%">YOUR WRONG! </span></span></div>

you're
</div>
touche'

btw I hate the whole your/you're thing...not as much as their/there/they're thing but close...

regardless he was still just plain
<span style="color:#FF0000"><span style="font-size:36pt;line-height:100%">WRONG! </span> </span>

at least I can spell wrong right lol.
 
Ben Gordon, Joe Smith and Adrian Griffin for Vince Carter and a pick!
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (RUstrong @ Feb 19 2008, 05:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jloc857 @ Feb 19 2008, 04:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><span style="color:#FF0000"><span style="font-size:24pt;line-height:100%">YOUR WRONG! </span></span></div>

you're
</div>
I am now correcting every bit of your grammar now.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (MyNetsForLife @ Feb 19 2008, 07:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (RUstrong @ Feb 19 2008, 05:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jloc857 @ Feb 19 2008, 04:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><span style="color:#FF0000"><span style="font-size:24pt;line-height:100%">YOUR WRONG! </span></span></div>

you're
</div>
I am now correcting every bit of your grammar now.

</div>

The second "now" in your sentence is tedious and unnecessary.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (User01 @ Feb 19 2008, 07:43 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (MyNetsForLife @ Feb 19 2008, 07:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (RUstrong @ Feb 19 2008, 05:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jloc857 @ Feb 19 2008, 04:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><span style="color:#ff0000"><span style="font-size:24pt;line-height:100%">YOUR WRONG! </span></span></div>

you're
</div>
I am now correcting every bit of your grammar now.

</div>

The second "now" in your sentence is tedious and unnecessary.
</div>
uh oh!

owned9wz.jpg
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (pegs @ Feb 19 2008, 07:57 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (User01 @ Feb 19 2008, 07:43 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (MyNetsForLife @ Feb 19 2008, 07:35 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (RUstrong @ Feb 19 2008, 05:11 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (jloc857 @ Feb 19 2008, 04:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><span style="color:#ff0000"><span style="font-size:24pt;line-height:100%">YOUR WRONG! </span></span></div>

you're
</div>
I am now correcting every bit of your grammar now.

</div>

The second "now" in your sentence is tedious and unnecessary.
</div>
uh oh!

owned9wz.jpg

</div>
Grammar War!
 
I don't want nothing to do with no grammar war! I anit doing it!
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (L @ Feb 19 2008, 08:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I don't want nothing to do with no grammar war! I anit doing it!</div>

I sense a 10-674 coming on.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Dumpy @ Feb 19 2008, 08:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (L @ Feb 19 2008, 08:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I don't want nothing to do with no grammar war! I anit doing it!</div>

I sense a 10-674 coming on.
</div>
I think its more of a 10-871-35
its a little known Hoboken Bylaw...
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Universe @ Feb 19 2008, 06:53 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Ben Gordon, Joe Smith and Adrian Griffin for Vince Carter and a pick!</div>
no way in hell do the bulls do that
 
per netsdaily "... discussions with the Knicks and Heat about a deal that would send Carter to New York, Eddy Curry to Miami and expiring contracts to New Jersey." OMG Thorn, DO IT!!!
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Belarus @ Feb 19 2008, 09:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>per netsdaily "... discussions with the Knicks and Heat about a deal that would send Carter to New York, Eddy Curry to Miami and expiring contracts to New Jersey." OMG Thorn, DO IT!!!</div>

But yet I so don't want to send Carter to NY. Anywhere else is fine, but not the Knicks.
 
there better be a 1st rd pick either from the heat or the knicks along with those expiring contracts
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The Joker @ Feb 19 2008, 09:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Belarus @ Feb 19 2008, 09:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>per netsdaily "... discussions with the Knicks and Heat about a deal that would send Carter to New York, Eddy Curry to Miami and expiring contracts to New Jersey." OMG Thorn, DO IT!!!</div>

But yet I so don't want to send Carter to NY. Anywhere else is fine, but not the Knicks.
</div>
Now, what's wrong with this? He's gonna be motivated against us or what?
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Belarus @ Feb 19 2008, 09:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The Joker @ Feb 19 2008, 09:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Belarus @ Feb 19 2008, 09:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>per netsdaily "... discussions with the Knicks and Heat about a deal that would send Carter to New York, Eddy Curry to Miami and expiring contracts to New Jersey." OMG Thorn, DO IT!!!</div>

But yet I so don't want to send Carter to NY. Anywhere else is fine, but not the Knicks.
</div>
Now, what's wrong with this? He's gonna be motivated against us or what?
</div>

I don't know; it's just the <u>Knicks</u>.
 
I prefer dealing RJ to Portland. I don't know why there aren't any rumours swirling around them. Yes, I understand that they want to build around their young guys, but as I understand it, if they don't do anything they'll end up with something like 20 players under contract next season. It seems like Seattle and Portland have half the draft picks this year between them.
 
i dont car eif its the knicks or whatever but getting expirings for vc would be a godsend, he needs to leave immediately
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Dumpy @ Feb 19 2008, 09:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I prefer dealing RJ to Portland. I don't know why there aren't any rumours swirling around them. Yes, I understand that they want to build around their young guys, but as I understand it, if they don't do anything they'll end up with something like 20 players under contract next season. It seems like Seattle and Portland have half the draft picks this year between them.</div>
portland will need to give extensions to roy, aldridge and there other young pieces so they'll need to trade some depth, if we take on Lafrentz contract, we might be able to get back outlaw.

rj, mags for outlaw and lafrentz
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The Joker @ Feb 19 2008, 09:16 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Belarus @ Feb 19 2008, 09:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The Joker @ Feb 19 2008, 09:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Belarus @ Feb 19 2008, 09:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>per netsdaily "... discussions with the Knicks and Heat about a deal that would send Carter to New York, Eddy Curry to Miami and expiring contracts to New Jersey." OMG Thorn, DO IT!!!</div>

But yet I so don't want to send Carter to NY. Anywhere else is fine, but not the Knicks.
</div>
Now, what's wrong with this? He's gonna be motivated against us or what?
</div>

I don't know; it's just the <u>Knicks</u>.
</div>

man F * c k that ! DO IT KIKI !!!
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Netsfan318 @ Feb 19 2008, 09:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The Joker @ Feb 19 2008, 09:16 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Belarus @ Feb 19 2008, 09:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (The Joker @ Feb 19 2008, 09:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Belarus @ Feb 19 2008, 09:10 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>per netsdaily "... discussions with the Knicks and Heat about a deal that would send Carter to New York, Eddy Curry to Miami and expiring contracts to New Jersey." OMG Thorn, DO IT!!!</div>

But yet I so don't want to send Carter to NY. Anywhere else is fine, but not the Knicks.
</div>
Now, what's wrong with this? He's gonna be motivated against us or what?
</div>

I don't know; it's just the <u>Knicks</u>.
</div>

man F * c k that ! DO IT KIKI !!!
</div>

That doesn't sound so bad. That's a good rebuilding move, although Thron has said you people "aren't" in that mode in another thread...
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jizzy @ Feb 19 2008, 09:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Dumpy @ Feb 19 2008, 09:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I prefer dealing RJ to Portland. I don't know why there aren't any rumours swirling around them. Yes, I understand that they want to build around their young guys, but as I understand it, if they don't do anything they'll end up with something like 20 players under contract next season. It seems like Seattle and Portland have half the draft picks this year between them.</div>
portland will need to give extensions to roy, aldridge and there other young pieces so they'll need to trade some depth, if we take on Lafrentz contract, we might be able to get back outlaw.

rj, mags for outlaw and lafrentz
</div>

plus rudy fernandez plus two of their second round picks.
 
thorn is not going to say we're rebuilding, it'll drive off the little fans we have left hence the "we're still trying to win and not give up" stance
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top