- Joined
- Jan 30, 2003
- Messages
- 45,018
- Likes
- 57
- Points
- 48
<div class="quote_poster">Quote:</div><div class="quote_post">There is no disputing Jason Kidd's abilities as a playmaker. As none other than Larry Brown happily would tell you, at least there's one superstar point guard around these parts who plays the game the right way, makes his teammates better and gets his team a bunch of wins.
But as brilliant as Kidd is at finding the open man, he hasn't had the same court vision when it comes to locating the best big men. Remember how he demanded that the Nets sign Alonzo Mourning? Even if the Nets parlayed that Kidd turnover into Vince Carter, it didn't solve their big-man problem.
So they will try to get it right this week when they sign another Kidd recruit, Shareef Abdur-Rahim, a much-needed low-post threat who should be able to prevent teams from loading up against Carter. If Jeff McInnis leaves his baggage in Cleveland and focuses on his new job of backing up Kidd, it'll be remembered as a very good summer for Bruce Ratner, his first in two tries as Nets owner.
But here's the big question: Will these moves get the Nets closer to the Pistons and Heat?
"I don't think there's any question we've closed the gap," Nets GM Ed Stefanski said yesterday.
The Nets should be better. They've upgraded two spots. But it also could be a case of the Pistons coming back to the pack, now that Brown has signed on to try to get Stephon Marbury to play more like Kidd. The real slippage could be in Miami, where Shaquille O'Neal always could show up for the season fat and content with his new long-term contract, and where Stan Van Gundy probably won't survive any kind of losing streak longer than, say, two games.
With today being the start of the signing period for NBA free agents, Stefanski couldn't talk about his two new additions by name. But by now, everyone knows who's going where.
All the talk around here lately has been about Brown and whether he can make any sense out of the hodge-podge of talent Isiah Thomas has assembled, with the embarrassingly high price tag of $118 million (not counting the coach's $10 million per). If Brown can't make it work, it's time for Jim Dolan to get a new Knicks president. But at a salary level nearly half their cross-river rivals, the Nets are going to be the team in the area to watch, into May.
"We've filled two huge needs we've been trying to fill since Kenyon Martin left and since J. Kidd got here," said Stefanski, whose roster will come in at around $63 million. "We really struggled when teams double-teamed Vince, but it won't be as easy now. And now we won't be worried about losing points when Jason's on the bench."
Abdur-Rahim's back-to-the-basket game is something that Martin never provided. But Abdur-Rahim also has never played in a playoff game, so who knows how he'll perform in May? Carter and Jefferson could end up stepping on each other's toes. But Stefanski is betting that they can coexist, probably because Kidd makes the kinds of plays that will have Brown telling Marbury, "See how it's done, Steph?" Even if they still don't have a competent, consistent long-range shooter, it should be impossible to duplicate last season's ranking for points (29th) and field-goal percentage (29th).</div>
Source
But as brilliant as Kidd is at finding the open man, he hasn't had the same court vision when it comes to locating the best big men. Remember how he demanded that the Nets sign Alonzo Mourning? Even if the Nets parlayed that Kidd turnover into Vince Carter, it didn't solve their big-man problem.
So they will try to get it right this week when they sign another Kidd recruit, Shareef Abdur-Rahim, a much-needed low-post threat who should be able to prevent teams from loading up against Carter. If Jeff McInnis leaves his baggage in Cleveland and focuses on his new job of backing up Kidd, it'll be remembered as a very good summer for Bruce Ratner, his first in two tries as Nets owner.
But here's the big question: Will these moves get the Nets closer to the Pistons and Heat?
"I don't think there's any question we've closed the gap," Nets GM Ed Stefanski said yesterday.
The Nets should be better. They've upgraded two spots. But it also could be a case of the Pistons coming back to the pack, now that Brown has signed on to try to get Stephon Marbury to play more like Kidd. The real slippage could be in Miami, where Shaquille O'Neal always could show up for the season fat and content with his new long-term contract, and where Stan Van Gundy probably won't survive any kind of losing streak longer than, say, two games.
With today being the start of the signing period for NBA free agents, Stefanski couldn't talk about his two new additions by name. But by now, everyone knows who's going where.
All the talk around here lately has been about Brown and whether he can make any sense out of the hodge-podge of talent Isiah Thomas has assembled, with the embarrassingly high price tag of $118 million (not counting the coach's $10 million per). If Brown can't make it work, it's time for Jim Dolan to get a new Knicks president. But at a salary level nearly half their cross-river rivals, the Nets are going to be the team in the area to watch, into May.
"We've filled two huge needs we've been trying to fill since Kenyon Martin left and since J. Kidd got here," said Stefanski, whose roster will come in at around $63 million. "We really struggled when teams double-teamed Vince, but it won't be as easy now. And now we won't be worried about losing points when Jason's on the bench."
Abdur-Rahim's back-to-the-basket game is something that Martin never provided. But Abdur-Rahim also has never played in a playoff game, so who knows how he'll perform in May? Carter and Jefferson could end up stepping on each other's toes. But Stefanski is betting that they can coexist, probably because Kidd makes the kinds of plays that will have Brown telling Marbury, "See how it's done, Steph?" Even if they still don't have a competent, consistent long-range shooter, it should be impossible to duplicate last season's ranking for points (29th) and field-goal percentage (29th).</div>
Source
