I was wondering if Paul allen is confident that the franchise tag will stay in the proposed new CBA as a way to keep Greg Oden. I'm fairly positive if there is a 45 million hardcap and two possible Amnesty clauses, why would we worry about losing Oden if he is a priority? In the NFL, you can keep a player as he is paid equal to the top 5 or 10 players in his position for one year. You can also franchise the same player the following year which is a way to leverage a long term contract at a lower rate. Considering there isn't a ton of great centers, and the the franchise tag is written similar to the NFL, it would seem like a great way to keep Greg without a risk to signing him long term considering his injury history. Any thoughts?
