...NFC Title Game

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
yep....and that was a horrible choice by the SF QB to risk the INT by throwing into the corner with TWO Seattle defenders VERY close to the receiver at that point in the game...almost amateurish.

Horrible.

They had time outs left- plenty of time to pick up the TD with a couple of "safer" passes.

And the NFL must do something about the rule which says it can't review a fumble "on the field" concerning the magnificent gallant play by SF LB Bowman stripping the ball from the Seattle player and still maintaining possession while suffering a terrible knee injury in the process.

Very tough break in more ways than one. Too bad. A great courageous play.

And now I hope Denver beats Seattle by 50 points!
 
Last edited:
Maybe little Wes will accidently fall and roll across Sherman's knee on a crossing pattern during the Super Bowl.
 
30 seconds later when Ed Werter interviewed him he seemed coherent, funny and lucid.
 
He joins Bart Scott's "Can't Wait" as one post game quote that will be played over and over again, can't wait

Sent from my Venue 8 3830 using Tapatalk
 
...someone asked him later what he had said to Crabtree...and he claimed he "Patted him on the back and told him "good game""...what f'n liar.
 
he was a huge tool and his antics completely detract from the feel good story of Derrick Coleman...
 
I had a friend point out to me just a few moments ago that Richard Sherman graduated second in his class in high school and got a communications degree from Stanford. He knew exactly what he was doing...putting the media focus on him rather than his second year quarterback who hasn't been playing that well and is facing all the pressure of the Superbowl....

If that is what he did, and that is a big IF, he definitely should have found a classier way to do that...
 
Sherman is a buffoon but that's what you get when you have guys like Boldin on your team who never shut the hell up. Not to mention a coach with his hysterics after every single play. I couldn't stand either team and will be rooting for Eli's brother in two weeks.
 
I don't think it was that deep. 5 minutes later on the ESPN set? Sure. 30 minutes later in a suit and tie at the podium? Ok.

30 seconds after making the biggest play of your life against a dude who'd been talking smack the entire game (after calling him out during the week)? I think it was pure emotion. I loved it. You can have your Gregg Popovich/Bill Belichick sideline interviews. Sherman gave the entire world the reason there are sideline interviews. (Hate him for that, maybe. ;) )
 
BrianFromWA said:
I don't think it was that deep. 5 minutes later on the ESPN set? Sure. 30 minutes later in a suit and tie at the podium? Ok.

30 seconds after making the biggest play of your life against a dude who'd been talking smack the entire game (after calling him out during the week)? I think it was pure emotion. I loved it. You can have your Gregg Popovich/Bill Belichick sideline interviews. Sherman gave the entire world the reason there are sideline interviews. (Hate him for that, maybe. ;) )
Click to expand...

I agree with you... just telling you what a friend pointed out... I am definitely far more inclined to believe it was just emotions getting the better of him resulting in something totally without class...
 
He owes Erin Andrews an apology. She looked scared shit during his childish rant.
 
Sherman should worry about the Super Bowl. He has some serious wide receivers coming to play against him in two weeks.
 
True, but I think the opposite is just as true. I can't think that Manning's seen a D this good that often, and especially since he's had the neck problems and lost a bit off his fastball. All of SEA's corners all can catch. Those flutterballs will turn into INTs, not just knockdowns & passes defensed.
 
Rick2583 said:
He owes Erin Andrews an apology. She looked scared shit during his childish rant.[/QUOTE


...she'll get an apology right after Jackson and Sharpton issue an apology to the Duke Lacrosse team players.
Click to expand...
 
Hammerojustice said:
I had a friend point out to me just a few moments ago that Richard Sherman graduated second in his class in high school and got a communications degree from Stanford..
Click to expand...



...what I can't understand is if this guy really has a degree from Stanford, why does he choose to speak and act like a "gangsta"?...makes no sense.
 
I'm treading on thin ice here b/c I'm a homer, but what was "gangsta" about his response to Andrews, or to Werter, or to the ESPN crew, or at the podium? He was brash, confident/cocky, destroyed the guy who'd been talking smack all week--

If you thought it was "gangsta" when Ali did it, or when Bird or Jordan did it, or when Deion Sanders did it, or when Johnny Manziell did it, or when Terrell Owens did it, or when Cris Carter did it this morning when talking about the Seahawks WRs, then I understand. But if you didn't, I don't see where the outrage comes from.
 
...does he articulate himself like like a typical Stanford grad?...yes or no?

...he acted like a punk, period.
 
Messiah717 said:
Sherman should worry about the Super Bowl. He has some serious wide receivers coming to play against him in two weeks.
Click to expand...

BrianFromWA said:
True, but I think the opposite is just as true. I can't think that Manning's seen a D this good that often, and especially since he's had the neck problems and lost a bit off his fastball. All of SEA's corners all can catch. Those flutterballs will turn into INTs, not just knockdowns & passes defensed.
Click to expand...

Brian, that may be true, but Seattle will be going up against arguably the best QB in the game right now... shattered records this year with that offense (1 of which was having the first team in NFL history to have 5 players with 10 or more TD's (1 rushing, 4 passing))... so, while Denver does have some serious wide receivers AND IMO the greatest QB in the game right now, they haven't gone against one of the better defenses, but of the top 10 defenses as far as points allowed, and they played 3 of the 10.

-KC who was tied for 5th they played 2 times, scoring 27 and 35 points (average of 31 pts/game) in weeks 11 and 13 against a team that gave up 305 points all season... so 243 points were against the remaining teams over 14 weeks or an average of 17.36 pts/game I think Denver did significantly better than the average team KC played there...

-Indy was 9th gave up 336 points on the season and Denver put up 33 points (in a loss) against them in week 7... so Denver scored 33, the other 15 weeks averaged 20.2 pts/game. Again, Denver scored significantly more than the average team Indy played.

-New England was the 10th team of the top 10 and gave up 338 points on the season and Denver put up 31 points in a loss during week 12. so Denver scored 31, the other 15 weeks averaged 20.47 pts/game. Again, Denver scored significantly more than the average team Indy played. But Denver played them again in the Conf championship and put up another 26 points... Look at it in just the post season, Indy scored 22 against NE... Denver did better. Furthermore, Denver's defense held Brady and Belichick in check too... had NE down by 20 before Brady started compiling #'s when the game was already in the bag...

Now look at Seattle... look at the teams they played...
How many teams did they play that were in the top 10 for scoring on the season??? (1 of the top 10 was Seattle themselves at #8...) #10 New Orleans played 1 time regular season and 1 time post season... that was it... so all the other teams Seattle played were weaker offensively than they were... hell, even the 1 team they played that was in the top 10 was still below them... In comparison, the Broncos played 5 games in the regular season and 1 in the post season against teams in the top 10 in scoring...

I just see this game not being close... Denver wins by at least a TD if not more
 
my point is that he's among the most articulate and intelligent players in the league, has shown so in multiple interviews and multiple segments on shows like First Take and SVP&Ruseillo, and he's getting crap because of a 15 second take after he made the play of his life against people who'd been talking smack since literally the offseason, and who did it again during the week and during the game.

The link showed how, within 8 hours of the game, he penned a pretty decent column delineating exactly what he was thinking and gave some context. I don't know that many players would/could have done that.
 
...uhhh, we''re talking about his behavior in the Erin Andrews and why a supposedly educated man "CHOSE" to relegate himself to acting like a "gansta"...he acted like a punk, plain and simple...and if you were not an admitted "homer" (your words) I seriously doubt you'd be defending him.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top