Sorry, Rick, I didn't know you were going for if it wasn't professional it was classy. Totally my fault.
This started out as a rant that Sherman was a "classless punk" "gangsta" "thug" for his postgame rants. Then after showing that he wasn't ranting to Ed Werter or the ESPN post-game crew or the podium, it became that he was a "gangsta thug" for scaring Erin Andrews. After it was pointed out that she herself said she wasn't scared and that it was "awesome", it then became him being a "classless punk" "gangsta" "thug" "taunting" Crabtree. After being proven that he actually just said "good game", it was whittled down to the detail that his giving a choke sign after being hit in the face was unprofessional. OK.
...uhh, it was not a "rant", it was SIX simple words...here. lemme refresh your memory; "...Richard Sherman, what a classless punk."
I agree that the choke sign was emotional and unprofessional. If you want to say "classless", sure. Now, will you agree that he is a very articulate and intelligent player who is the best CB in the NFL? Or are you going to stick with the "thug" "gangsta" spiel, even after it's all been stripped away as not true?
...no one has disputed his talent on the field, but IN THAT INTERVIEW, he behaved like a punk, a thug, and a gangsta....not sure why you keep going off on these tangents.
And has anyone brought up Crabtree punching a guy in the face? Until that point (regardless of what you think of his Andrews speech or his post-game comments) the only thing he'd done was say "good game" and offer his hand. Is that gangsta thug classless punk, or what?[
...again, try if you can, to stay on topic...Crabtree has nothing to do with the way Sherman acted. Was Crabtree flagged?...no. Did Crabtree act in any way similar to Sherman in an interview?...no