Obama = Bush for counter terror

[Eastoff]

http://www.salon.com/2012/06/04/obama_again_bombs_mourners/singleton/?miaou

Also defending Obama’s militarism this week was another former Bush speechwriter who wrote an entire falsehood-filled book advocating torture: The Washington Post‘s Marc Thiessen. He celebrated what he accurately called “the Obama-Bush doctrine” and wrote: “the two men’s counterterrorism policies are virtually indistinguishable — except in the liberal reaction to them”

 

[3RA1N1AC]

obama is a warlord

 

[maxiep]

Obama chooses to avoid the political blowback on capturing terrorists, so he just kills them instead, even if they're American. Too bad; we've likely blown up people who could have offered a tremendous amount of intelligence information.

 

[MARIS61]

Bush pointlessly killed a couple hundred thousand innocent civilians with his shock and awe debacle, and refused to even pursue Bin Laden or attack the country (Saudi Arabia) that raised, trained and sent the 9/11 terrorists to America.

Obama pursued and killed Bin Laden while killing a couple hundred thousand LESS innocent civilians.

Only a moron would fail to notice a decided difference in both their approach and their results.

 

[jlprk]

Democratic presidents are more humanitarian. They kill their victims immediately. Republicans torture them for years until they die.

The Bush Administration principals can't leave the U.S. or they'll be arrested as war criminals. We'll see whether it happens with the top Obama people. Hillary is sure a war criminal.