Didnt Lebron pretty much just debunk this the other night??
Im more and more concerned about the 3 being our first offensive thought... or being a 3 and D team.
Stephan Curry was absolutely on fire at the end of the fourth in game three and brought them back, but it still wasn't enough. In Game two he was atrocious. Why? It wasn't better offense by Cleveland. IT was Cleveland's D that did it. In my opinion, it is easier to stick to a guy on the 3 line and get a hand in his face as he takes a stepback three, but it is much more difficult to defend a quality post up guy,. or a guy who can drive to the basket like Lebron.
Some might say, yeah, but its Lebron.
I know the stats about the teams that made it to the conference finals and their stats on 3pt shooting, but I still think we are seeing maybe the best ever team at shooting 3's and they arent going to win a championship on their best season.
Does anyone think GS can match this season or do better in the next couple years with regards to lack of injuries, domination of the regular season and record setting shooting?
The best 3 pt shooting team ever is STILL not gonna win.
Did that space get them a win in the last two games since Cleveland has pressured the 3pt line? Is that space gonna get them a ring? Sure doesn't look like it to me.
Great shooters will have streaks for sure, but they will also have slumps and slumps are 100% unpredictable.
A guy who pounds it into the paint or slashes to the basket is much more consistent than three point shooting will ever be.
I am starting to question my own logic in supporting the current offensive scheme Stotts has us doing. I want more interior post presence with some defensive fire. Where's the ANGST players in the paint? We have none.
With that said, I think the best offence is a balanced offence and the spurs over the years back that up.