Natebishop3
Don't tread on me!
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2008
- Messages
- 94,246
- Likes
- 57,515
- Points
- 113
The T-Pups look disappointing
Because they have been "young and promising" for decades.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The T-Pups look disappointing
@Chris Craig might as well just pay me now.The T-Pups look disappointing
Only 12 years ago, they were in the WCF.Because they have been "young and promising" for decades.
Only 12 years ago, they were in the WCF.
Uhhhh....so are the Lakers actually pretty good this year? Didn't expect to see them playing this well this season. Is Luke Walton actually a good coach?
They have nice young players and their role players are just good as ours. They just need couple stars now and they'll be really back
Uhhhh....so are the Lakers actually pretty good this year? Didn't expect to see them playing this well this season. Is Luke Walton actually a good coach?

Ibaka....31/9 and 4 blocks against his old team. I am sure he enjoyed that. (While getting the win in OKC)
I hate Thunder. Had only them missing on my 6-game accumulator which would have won me a tidy $700.
If the playoffs ended right now......OKC on losing skid. Now we just need Utah to lose. Tied with Memphis with 3 mins left.
OKC on losing skid. Now we just need Utah to lose. Tied with Memphis with 3 mins left.
Don't disagree, but Boston has been without Al Horford.East is so weak this year. Even Boston look pretty dire and they are one of top 4 teams there. Aside from Cavaliers and Hawks none of them look any decent, Pacers have been dreadful, Bulls have been very inconsistent, Celtics have been meh. Actually the way they've been playing, I would not be surprised if Bucks or (fanfare) Brooklyn made it into playoffs. Brooklyn in particular have been a surprising package, if they carry this on they will exceed the number of wins I expected for them in full season by Christmas (I had them down for no more than 15 wins, most likely 12-13). This shows the difference between a team that own their pick (Philadelphia) and the ones who don't and have no incentive to tank (Brooklyn). They're basically a collection of players nobody else wanted, plus Brook Lopez, yet they've already got 4 wins and have looked quite solid (last night aside).
And what's our best offer? Including CJ is not a possibility in my mind.
I would be very interested to hear what teams could, and would, offer packages that would exceed some combo of Aminu/Davis/Crabbe/Turner/Meyers/Vonleh/Plumlee/picks. I just don't see that many teams that make sense as a landing spot for DMC, and even fewer teams that could/would make a substantially better offer than we could make. There might be a couple (BOS, LAL), but I don't think there's a lot of competition in the bidding war for DMC.If we don't include CJ, the problem is that a lot of teams could/would offer a better package.
If we don't include CJ, the problem is that a lot of teams could/would offer a better package. And a package of Crabbe-Davis-Aminu and multiple draft picks wont't do it... I simply don't see a possibility. But I would really want a DMC to PDX trade to happen.
Too bad Ezeli is injured as he has family in Sacramento. I love Plumlee and he has value around the league. As I bet the young Vonleh does as well.
But no we are not giving them CJ. Too risky.
So Dwight is ballin in ATL and they're playing really well. I feel like we missed out.
I was in favor of signing him. I was skeptical at first, but I was a little disappointed when we didn't even make a play.
