JDC
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2008
- Messages
- 3,505
- Likes
- 3,380
- Points
- 113
I also dislike the lack of nuance around the discussion of drop defense.
I agree that a deep drop has no place in the playoffs at this point against the elite off the dribble creators / shooters.
But you still can be more aggressive at the point of attack and play your big higher up on the floor and have a lot of effectiveness with it.
You can also utilize aggressive stunts and recovers to disrupt the ball handlers rhythm if you want to play your big a little bit further back. We saw the clippers do that really well against CP and Book in game 3. They also did a great job mixing up where they're bringing that help.
And honestly I feel like that that is going to throw a guard off more than how you choose to play your big. The first read for all these guys is incredibly easy at this point. They're all so well drilled. But if you can make the second and third read unpredictable I think that's where you're going to bring out the most indecision from these guys.
I'm not saying being able to switch up your scheme with your big is not important and can't provide some sort of value, but i think it's overstated.
The effort intensity and discipline you play within your scheme it's always going to be more important than any one scheme on its own, and that's where we have the most ground to make up.
I agree that a deep drop has no place in the playoffs at this point against the elite off the dribble creators / shooters.
But you still can be more aggressive at the point of attack and play your big higher up on the floor and have a lot of effectiveness with it.
You can also utilize aggressive stunts and recovers to disrupt the ball handlers rhythm if you want to play your big a little bit further back. We saw the clippers do that really well against CP and Book in game 3. They also did a great job mixing up where they're bringing that help.
And honestly I feel like that that is going to throw a guard off more than how you choose to play your big. The first read for all these guys is incredibly easy at this point. They're all so well drilled. But if you can make the second and third read unpredictable I think that's where you're going to bring out the most indecision from these guys.
I'm not saying being able to switch up your scheme with your big is not important and can't provide some sort of value, but i think it's overstated.
The effort intensity and discipline you play within your scheme it's always going to be more important than any one scheme on its own, and that's where we have the most ground to make up.
Last edited: