Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sure, why not.CJ for Booker.
Let somebody else take the big shots, then. I'd do it just to see if Stotts could make it work. I guess I am bored with this team.no thanks, Westbrick is not a guy you want taking big shots during big games. Sure, energetic player with some razzle dazzle but he chokes to many times.
The one thing he does that I like is push the ball up court but not sure thats Dames game, playing off the ball mostly?Let somebody else take the big shots, then. I'd do it just to see if Stotts could make it work. I guess I am bored with this team.
I don't know if it's feasible either, but Russ could try to run a fastbreak and if it wasn't there, give the ball back to Lillard. Would need three other shooter on the floor also. Use Russ only as a cutter or for postups.The one thing he does that I like is push the ball up court but not sure thats Dames game, playing off the ball mostly?
Yeh, I thought Harden actually tried too hard to get him involved on offense. I think my main reservation concerning Westbrook is that he doesn't seem to be much of a defender anymore.Westbrook wants to be the man he doesn't like to share the spotlight with anyone.
x100 times over.CJ for Booker.
How in gods name is Conley making 35M a year!!!???
You fucking think FAMS? WHat a joke!When Conley got his contract, he was a fringe all-star & putting up very good advanced metrics. He's really never gotten as much publicity for how good of a player he was.
Last year kindof took the shine off his play though....
CJ for Booker.
I still do it quickly, but was surprised to see Booker is only a career 35% shooter from 3. Always seems like a much better shooter than that.Suns just hung up the phone
I still do it quickly, but was surprised to see Booker is only a career 35% shooter from 3. Always seems like a much better shooter than that.
agreedThe Suns wont
Yeah I read some shit like PG13 and a future first for Russ and RoCo. Taking RoCo out of the equation makes a lot more sense as far as a talent exchange and due to salary matching.Now word out there the Clips want to send PG13 and ANOTHER first round pick to Houston for Russ!
View attachment 34907
The initial trade for PG13 was a severe OVERPAY.Now word out there the Clips want to send PG13 and ANOTHER first round pick to Houston for Russ!
View attachment 34907
The salaries just don't work when adding RoCo... I mean the Clippers could add Pat Bev or Lou Will and Zubac but I don't know if that's what they'll want to do but crunching the numbers those are really the only options I see for them.The initial trade for PG13 was a severe OVERPAY.
However, assuming the sunk cost of that trade - the proposal of PG13+Pick for Russ+Covington makes a TON of sense for the clippers.
They only need to add Lou. I don't see that as a big impact for Clips.The salaries just don't work when adding RoCo... I mean the Clippers could add Pat Bev or Lou Will and Zubac but I don't know if that's what they'll want to do but crunching the numbers those are really the only options I see for them.
I really doubt that the cavs would want Ariza and Hood, they probably like the young guns like, Trent, Collins, Little and our PickI know picks need to be involved, but I'm not sure how they need to flow...
Cavs get out of a bad contract.
Warriors get a better fit.
Blazers get the best player (at this point in their careers).
View attachment 34910
Who is that 3rd team? Mhh
I think it is important to note that the rumor says that there is a third team that gets Green, that more than likely means that the team that gets Green sends assets to both Cleveland and Golden State. So obviously Love for Green is a bad deal but there are unmentioned pieces that could make it a very good deal for all parties or even a lopsided deal in favor of the Warriors.Whut? What GM in their right mind prefers Love to Green?