tlongII
Legendary Poster
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2008
- Messages
- 17,399
- Likes
- 12,167
- Points
- 113
I know you're not trying to see why baseball identified gambling as it's #1 sin, but I'm going to explain it anyway.
When teams cheat, they're always trying to win. Amphetamines, steroids, corked bats, pine tar, sign stealing--all are attempts to gain an advantage, to increase the likelihood of winning. After the Black Sox scandal, baseball cared more about that than anything else--that every batter, every pitcher, every coach, everyone on the field is trying every game to win.
They never cared about gambling per se; they cared about players/coaches being involved with bookmakers. The potential for gambling debts to unsavory characters provided the opportunity for said bookmakers to have significant leverage over an active major league manager.
Fans care about "numbers", "history", "legacy", etc. MLB cares primarily about money. As far as they're concerned, "cheating" doesn't make the game less interesting; it arguably makes it moreso. People believing that games could be rigged (ie, how many feel about the NBA) damages the product massively.
If baseball identified gambling as its #1 sin, then why do they have an ownership interest in a betting site?
