Ok, the the major players are now known for the 2013-2014 season.

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

And GS and the Clips and Houston...

Two rookies, two wash-ups and Robin Lopez doesn't net us 20 more wins than we had last season.

Well since we tanked the last 15 games: I'm sure we can pick up 20 easily.
 
One thing to remember: the Blazers of course tanked at the end of the season - so the total number of losses may seem amplified, but the Blazers were also surprisingly good at home during the early-middle part of the season. If the Blazers can click like they did last December and January, for even longer (even if it's only at home), Portland could be looking at a #5 or #6 seed. But that's a lot to ask. Crappy teams like New Orleans and Minnesota have gotten better, and even the good teams that appear to be backsliding (Denver, Lakers, Dallas, Jazz) haven't fully fallen into mediocrity.
 
Re: Ok, the major players are now known for the 2013-2014 season.

Baseless? I said we'd pick up 20 more wins. So far, we are on pace to pick up 30! Hahaha.

I'm not saying you may be wrong. I am saying it was a baseless prediction.
 
Re: Ok, the major players are now known for the 2013-2014 season.

I'm not saying you may be wrong. I am saying it was a baseless prediction.

No, I had in another thread, explaining why I thought we would pick up 20 games after most of you guys called me out on it. I think even Denny called me out as well!
 
Re: Ok, the major players are now known for the 2013-2014 season.

Nice bump for a completely baseless prediction

220px-The_Grinch_%28That_Stole_Christmas%29.jpg
 
Re: Ok, the major players are now known for the 2013-2014 season.


... all you want, but for some to get warned and suspended and others to be completely overlooked is stupid. Be consistent and either allow it or don't, but picking and choosing is dumb
 
Re: Ok, the major players are now known for the 2013-2014 season.

... all you want, but for some to get warned and suspended and others to be completely overlooked is stupid. Be consistent and either allow it or don't, but picking and choosing is dumb

No bumping threads from 6 season's ago is not allowed. This is a bump from a thread made this year grumpy....
 
Re: Ok, the major players are now known for the 2013-2014 season.

Bumping threads is against the rules I thought?

Only when you do it. (I was just kidding by the way.)

Nate, Julius and I have different views on this subject. I personally have no problem with it and in fact think it's one of the nicer features of this forum. Forums like Oregonlive delete their old posts and in that forum when no one can ever call you on the BS you post it leads to more BS being posted.

Nate and Julius say it just leads to more "I told you so" arguments, while I see where they're coming from I don't see it as a huge problem and should be judged on a bump by bump basis.
 
Last edited:
Re: Ok, the major players are now known for the 2013-2014 season.

No bumping threads from 6 season's ago is not allowed. This is a bump from a thread made this year grumpy....

So is that the magic ingredient.....calendar year?
 
Re: Ok, the major players are now known for the 2013-2014 season.

No bumping threads from 6 season's ago is not allowed. This is a bump from a thread made this year grumpy....

That's not true. I think it's fun to look back on old threads, ideas and opinions. Where the problem happens is when someone uses a bump as a way to ridicule someone for a past opinion or idea they may have had.
 
Re: Ok, the major players are now known for the 2013-2014 season.

Only when you do it.

Nate, Julius and I have different views on this subject. I personally have no problem with it and in fact think it's one of the nicer features of this forum. Forums like Oregonlive delete their old posts and in that forum when no one can ever call you on the BS you post it leads to more BS being posted.

Nate and Julius say it just leads to more "I told you so" arguments, while I see where they're coming from I don't see it as a huge problem and should be judged on a bump by bump basis.

LOL ok

So mags saying I told you so about his prediction back in July is fine, but others saying I told you so about whatever isn't.

It's turning ito Lord of the Flies around here. Who is Piggy?
 
Re: Ok, the major players are now known for the 2013-2014 season.

LOL ok

So mags saying I told you so about his prediction back in July is fine, but others saying I told you so about whatever isn't.

It's turning ito Lord of the Flies around here. Who is Piggy?

I bumped myself grumpy! Hahahaha... I told myself so! Damn I'm mad!
 
Re: Ok, the major players are now known for the 2013-2014 season.

... all you want, but for some to get warned and suspended and others to be completely overlooked is stupid. Be consistent and either allow it or don't, but picking and choosing is dumb

No one has ever been suspended for bumping an old thread at RipCityTwo.
 
Re: Ok, the major players are now known for the 2013-2014 season.

LOL ok

So mags saying I told you so about his prediction back in July is fine, but others saying I told you so about whatever isn't.

It's turning ito Lord of the Flies around here. Who is Piggy?

As the best line in "Rounders"

If you can't spot the sucker in your first half hour at the table, then you are the sucker.
 
Re: Ok, the major players are now known for the 2013-2014 season.

I am pretty sure I am not Piggy

Great movie reference though

One of my favorite movies of all time. Can watch it over and over and over again. I thought it was fitting for the question because it fit perfectly. :D
 
Re: Ok, the major players are now known for the 2013-2014 season.

LOL ok

So mags saying I told you so about his prediction back in July is fine, but others saying I told you so about whatever isn't.

It's turning ito Lord of the Flies around here. Who is Piggy?

I'm not sure what you want. You seem to have a lot of complaints about me, how I moderate and my explanations about why I moderate the way I do. Let me try and explain my thoughts on this a little more clearly.

If someone bumps an old thread and says, "Look how stupid ________ is, he wanted to trade Player X 2 years ago. Hahahaha, the idiot doesn't know anything about basketball." I would have a problem with that. IMO that is going to lead to insults and arguments and not basketball discussion.

The "I told you so" bump depends on the I told you so'ing. "I told you guys the Blazers were going to be good." Seems like a good bump. "I told you _______ is a fucking idiot and doesn't know what they're talking about." is not a good bump.

You know MM, it's not black and white. The mods don't get together and think of ways to pick on you. We try to keep this forum fun and feud free. We make mistakes but we try and learn from them.
 
Thanks god someone bumped this thread so MM has another way to demonstrate how oppressed he is.

Maybe I should have attached some 100+ year old footage about a totally different time to show how oppressed I am?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top