Okay you be the manager......

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Rick2583

Chairman of the board
Joined
Jul 9, 2013
Messages
15,629
Likes
719
Points
113
First off the lineup, I see it like this.....

CF - Ellsbury (L)
2B - Castro (R)
RF - Beltran (S)
1B - Teixeira (S)
DH - Rodriquez (R)
C - McCann (L)
3B - Headley (S)
LF - Gardner (S)
SS - Gregorius (L)

Next up our bench, who stays & who goes & who backs up who?

Bird, Ackley, Refsnyder, Hicks, Heathcott.

I'm guess that Bird, Heathcott & Refsnyder all get sent down. leaving Ackley to back up 2B, OF & 1B & Hicks for OF. CATCHER, Sanchez or Romine?
 
So is it safe to assume that you guys all agree with my starting lineup & the other moves? DAMN! I'm better than I thought.
 
Looks good to me. I'll be dreaming of the day Harper is in the Yankee lineup.
 
Yeah that 4 spot has got his name written all over it. Which makes me wonder about Teixeira, what happens if he has a great 2016 season? I'm talking 30+, 100+ & 260-270+ Just what Cashman would need to resign him to a short term deal & the hell with Bird.
 
...this year's roster pretty much looks like last year's roster to me.
 
I hear you Ron but at least with the addition of Castro Gardner can be moved from the top of the order.

And in your opinion what would you do if Teixeira has a monster year. resign him short term (say 2 years) for less money or let him walk & slide Bird in?
 
...^^^ Castro won't be playing at Wrigley Field anymore, plus I think that his questionable defense may offset what offense he may bring to the table...hope I'm wrong.

...as far as Tex, I'd probably wait and see if Bird can repeat what he did last year with the bat...if he excels, let Tex walk...if he struggles, consider Tex on an incentive laden ONE year deal based on performance and/or his ability to stay healthy as opposed to spending a lot of time on the DL. A one year deal would mean he'd be 37+ years old by the time the contract is over.

...problem is, if Tex does have the kind of year you mentioned, some other team may be willing to give him more than one year...if that's the case, see ya Tex.
 
Should the Hsteins and Cashman see yesterdays commentary written by Wallace Matthews & A Marchand (idiots) they should hang their heads in collective shame. One article promotes the Mets as the "new" Yankees, the other dealt with Warren being traded. (another bad move. Maybe I'm missing part of the "plan" or can't see the "big" picture but when a Yankee team hits status that prompt articles written by dumb and dumber its time for a change. I don't know about anyone else on this board but unless a minor miracle appears the '16 Yankees will be just another team. Couple that up with the fact that Big Sloppi will be honored in '16 per the Brass, a real crock of shit.
 
...^^^yup, I wasn't crazy about the Warren trade or the Murphy trade.
 
Between Romine & Sanchez I think Sanchez will be the backup but, that's what ST is for.
 
It's time for Sanchez. I want to see what he can do.

Yep.
It just may be time for Sanchez.....very soon, which may have made Murphy "expendable" in exchange for a young talented one time first rounder outfielder (Hicks) who has made significant strides at the plate last year batting .307 and .870 OPS vs LHP while "improving" to .235 vs RHP, overall .256/.721, and he's still "learning"... also stole 13/16 bases in 97 games.....with much more room for improvement (of course).....and with more improvement vs RHP, the Yanks will have a pretty good young outfielder making 550K this season.
And already an outstanding defender according to his current career stats.
3 errors, 22 assists, .995 fldg% , 6 DP in 243 games -
2.83 R/F per 9 inn which was 60% points better than league average.

Please understand that I am NOT saying he is going to be anything close to Mike Trout, although it WOULD be nice, lmao....but just for a little bit of perspective......and of course I realize Trout has played approx 400 more games.....but even if Hicks does slip a bit with more playing time, he should still be an excellent outfielder/CF.
Trout: 11 errors, 14 assists, .993 fldg%, 3 DP- .262 R/F

On Sanchez:
Here's a link from MLB.COM rating the top 10 C prospects.
Below is their report on Sanchez.

http://m.mlb.com/news/article/162444880/prospect-watch-top-10-catchers-for-2016?topicid=151437456

2. Gary Sanchez, Yankees
Sanchez resuscitated his prospect stock last season between the Double-A and Triple-A levels, and he made his big league debut in early October. He then showcased his huge power and cannon arm in the Arizona Fall League, pacing the circuit with seven home runs and a 62 percent caught-stealing rate. Despite Sanchez's improvement as a blocker and receiver last season, questions remain about whether he will be able to catch every day in the big leagues. However, there's little doubt that he's ready to make an impact at the plate.


By the way, although I liked Murph and he did a good job, it remains to be seen how well HE will perform and hold up as a possible "everyday" catcher.
 
Last edited:
Between Romine & Sanchez I think Sanchez will be the backup but, that's what ST is for.


...highly regarded Yankee catching prospects;

1. Jesus Montero...traded

2. J R Murphy...traded

3. Gary Sanchez...?
 
I cannot wait for baseball. That being said..............
there are 5 players in Yankee line up who will see the
IR sometime during the season. This line up is one of the
most fragile in all of baseball.
 
^^^ I can see 3 of them Cage,........... Ellsbury, Beltran & Teixeira. & maybe A-Roid. Unless you're talking about a pitcher & can't think of a 5th.
 
McCann's only problem is you cannot have him behind the plate all season. The guy clearly hits the wall in a major way. Days off and DH time in the first half is a must or else it's just going to be rinse and repeat.
 
So do you guys agree that Bird, Refsnyder & Heathcott all start the season in the minors?
 
I really believe Ellsbury, Beltran, Teixeira, A-Roid,
Headley will wind up on IR. McCann could. So could
Gardner. Didn't even think of the pitchers...........
CC, Eovaldi, Tanaka are better than 50-50. But, the
guy that belongs on IR is Cashman. Yet, he finds a
way to GM with minimal brain cells.
 
The Rays just picked up Dickerson from the Rockies for next to nothing, I think this kid is going to be a real good one, I know we've got a full outfield but no way I would have let this kid go unnoticed.
 
...can't believe the Rays stole this kid from the Rockies...Cashman could have made this deal...I'd take Dickerson over anyone we have in the minors ...and he's been touted as a "future batting title winner"...his stroke is that good.
 
After seeing this kid go by unnoticed by the Yankees I'm convinced that Cashman has blinders on.
 
...highly regarded Yankee catching prospects;

1. Jesus Montero...traded

2. J R Murphy...traded

3. Gary Sanchez...?

I can see how silly those moves could look on face value.
Understandable.

However, while Montero was considered a good C prospect, there were rumblings about HIS attitude but putting that aside, the Yanks did trade him for a (then) 25 yr old SP who was an all star when he was 22 yrs old and they knew they also had Murphy waiting in the wings.

And speaking of Murphy, whether or not we agree with the trade (Hicks), the Yanks (and I agree) they had a chance to pick up a physically talented 26 yr old Outfielder/CF who is widely considered an excellent defender who has done very well vs LHP while also "improving" a bit vs RHP in 2015 when he had his most playing time (ABs).......and coupled with Sanchez on the cusp of being ready to make the big club, it wasn't exactly the end of the world (imo) trading Murphy who himself batted .277 last year with 4 HRs in 155 ABs.

And the obvious question now is what Sanchez does a d how the Yanks handle him. They could start him at AAA for a couple of months and in the meantime let Romine be a place holder.

By the way, I believe the Yanks also have a pretty good C prospect in the lower minors.
We'll see how things turn out......my crystal ball is on the fritz.
 
Hicks will end up as a part time bench player. If he gets 250-300 ABs he'll be lucky. IMO The Yankees should have found a way to unload Gardner for a solid pitcher. And now seeing how Cashman forgot about how talented the kid the Rays just got from the Rockies (Dickerson) for next to nothing I'd have taken him over Hicks in a heartbeat.
 
Hicks will end up as a part time bench player. If he gets 250-300 ABs he'll be lucky. IMO The Yankees should have found a way to unload Gardner for a solid pitcher. And now seeing how Cashman forgot about how talented the kid the Rays just got from the Rockies (Dickerson) for next to nothing I'd have taken him over Hicks in a heartbeat.

...Hicks is a 2016 version of Chris Young...a platoon/backup OFer.
 
...can't believe the Rays stole this kid from the Rockies...Cashman could have made this deal...I'd take Dickerson over anyone we have in the minors ...and he's been touted as a "future batting title winner"...his stroke is that good.


Couple of things:
Although McGee is a good one, why would the other genius, the Colorado GM trade Dickerson for a reliever who can be a free agent after this season?
Maybe Trashman could've should've offered Justin Wilson for him?
Of course!

As for Dickerson being a "future batting title winner", he may have to pick it up a bit vs LHP and away from Coors Field.
Career vs LHP:
.246 BA, .677 OPS, 1K per 3.3 AB.
Career away from Coors:
.249 BA, .695 OPS, 1K per 3.6 AB.

Personally speaking, I would very much like to see what Heathcott and Williams can do, both younger than Dickerson as is Hicks.
 
Last edited:
...there's also been rumblings about Hicks being a "head case"...and though he's listed as a switch hitter, he's not a very good one because he still sucks vs RHed pitching when batting from the left side of the plate.
...last year's (.235 .302 .359 .661) still = suckage, especially from a corner OFer. For his career it's even worse. (.206 .284 .311 .596)...,maybe he needs to bat RHed all the time and forget about trying to be a switch hitter...for now, he's a platoon player, and rightly so.

...it seems that derogatory splits somehow apply to Dickerson but not to Hicks...hmmm...deja vu...and I was not the one who touted Dickerson as "a future batting champion". That was a quote from an article and I'm far from the only person who thinks the Rays made a great trade. ...and the reason Dickerson was traded was because Colorado had a surplus of corner OFers...and TB acquired him very cheaply...looks like my point was unintentionally proven.

...as far as Murphy, not many catchers hit better than .277 last year. In fact, he had the highest BA of any AL catcher with 150 PAs or more. He's also a solid defender and the pitchers like pitching with him in there.
 
...there's also been rumblings about Hicks being a "head case"...and though he's listed as a switch hitter, he's not a very good one because he still sucks vs RHed pitching when batting from the left side of the plate.
...last year's (.235 .302 .359 .661) still = suckage, especially from a corner OFer. For his career it's even worse. (.206 .284 .311 .596)...,maybe he needs to bat RHed all the time and forget about trying to be a switch hitter...for now, he's a platoon player, and rightly so.

...it seems that derogatory splits somehow apply to Dickerson but not to Hicks...hmmm...deja vu...and I was not the one who touted Dickerson as "a future batting champion". That was a quote from an article and I'm far from the only person who thinks the Rays made a great trade. ...and the reason Dickerson was traded was because Colorado had a surplus of corner OFers...and TB acquired him very cheaply...looks like my point was unintentionally proven.

...as far as Murphy, not many catchers hit better than .277 last year. In fact, he had the highest BA of any AL catcher with 150 PAs or more. He's also a solid defender and the pitchers like pitching with him in there.


I know you weren't the one attributed with touting Dickerson as a possible future batting champion. And I know Dickerson is clearly the better more accomplished hitter than Hicks......while Hicks, 26 yrs old has yet to play more than 97 games in a season (last year) and has had 819 ABs stretched over three seasons, I would think it's still too early to label him as a type of career platoon backup player.

As for Dickerson, I was merely pointing out his lopsided stats away from Coors Field and vs LHP in regards to him being a possible "future batting champ", and there have been other "Coors Field hitters" in the past - but I do think the kid generally has shown to be a good hitter.

As for Hicks- yes indeed he has sucked vs RHP but let's just consider last season when he played more ( 97g) than his previous two seasons.
Hicks overall, .256 BA/ .721 OPS
Gardner .259 BA/ .742 OPS

Yes Hicks sucked vs RHP, .236/.663.....
....but was outstanding vs LHP, .307/.870 OPS.
And it's not a fair comparison of Hicks and Chris Young.
Young over a 10 year career has batted .263/.837 OPS vs LHP, not so overwhelming is it?
...has batted just .224/ .704 OPS vs RHP...... poor.
Maybe we shouldn't expect Hicks to continue to bat .307/ .870 OPS throughout his career vs LHP.....but it's reasonable to expect him to do "well" vs LHP and if he can raise his BA 15 or so points vs RHP as he gains more ABs and playing time, he'll be a good productive player who has already established ability to help the team with his glove and speed/SB..... he stole 13/16 bases in just 97 games and has a career 74% success rate at stealing bases....nothing to sneeze at, Gardy stole 20/25 bases in 151 games. Hicks is also insurance against injury to any of the outfielders......and I don't think it's ridiculous to say Hicks could eventually earn more playing time or outright take over a position.
And there's still a possibility Gardy won't finish his contract as a Yankee.

We may not like the Murphy trade or believe Trashman should've gotten more in return for him, but it's done......let's see how it turns out.
 
Last edited:
I for one am quite surprised that Gardner wasn't moved during this off season.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top