Oliver Stone's 'Secret History' to put Hitler 'in context'

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Denny Crane

It's not even loaded!
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
May 24, 2007
Messages
73,073
Likes
10,877
Points
113
http://www.thrfeed.com/2010/01/oliver-stone-history-america.html

Oliver Stone's 'Secret History' to put Hitler 'in context'

TCA -- Director Oliver Stone's upcoming Showtime documentary miniseries "Secret History of America" promises to put mass murderers such as Stalin and Hitler "in context."

"Stalin, Hitler, Mao, McCarthy -- these people have been vilified pretty thoroughly by history," Stone told reporters at the Television Critics Association's semi-annual press tour in Pasadena.

"Stalin has a complete other story," Stone said. "Not to paint him as a hero, but to tell a more factual representation. He fought the German war machine more than any single person. We can't judge people as only 'bad' or 'good.' Hitler is an easy scapegoat throughout history and its been used cheaply. He's the product of a series of actions. It's cause and effect ... People in America don't know the connection between WWI and WWII ... I've been able to walk in Stalin's shoes and Hitler's shoes to understand their point of view. We're going to educate our minds and liberalize them and broaden them. We want to move beyond opinions ... Go into the funding of the Nazi party. How many American corporations were involved, from GM through IBM. Hitler is just a man who could have easily been assassinated."

The controversial director's 10-part documentary series for Showtime promises to focus on events that "at the time went under-reported, but crucially shaped America's unique and complex history of the last 60 years." Subjects in "History" include President Harry Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb on Japan and the origins of the Cold War with the Soviet Union.

"You cannot approach history unless you have empathy for the person you may hate," Stone said during the show's trailer, which promised to put historical villains "in context." "I don't want to put out conventional History Channel product where it's easy to like it."

"He's not saying we're going to come out with a more positive view of Hitler," emphasized professor Peter Kuznick, the lead writer on the project. "But we're going to describe him as a historical phenomenon and not just somebody who appeared out of nowhere."

Stone said that conservative pundits will dislike the show.

"Obviously, Rush Limbaugh is not going to like this history and, as usual, we're going to get those kind of ignorant attacks," said Stone, who also also compared the experience of sympathizing with war criminals to making his "W" movie about George W. Bush. "I'm trying to understand somebody I thoroughly despised."

Stone also warned that the same military industrial complex forces that he's explored in movies such as "JFK" and in "Secret History," are now corrupting Barack Obama.

"You can understand why Obama is following in Bush's footsteps in Afghanistan," Stone said."Obama is very much trapped, we believe, in that system. And so that's what we're going to try and show you -- the way it works."

The project will also show lesser-known positive aspects of American history and unsung heroes. Stone eventually hopes to send "Secret History" to schools as a teaching curriculum.

"It would be a very different counterweight to what they're learning," Stone said. "Nobody is going to force it down anybody's throat."

A critic also asked Stone "the Sarah Palin question" of what he likes to read.

"My father was a voracious New York Times reader," he said. "We consider that in The Middle. Sarah Palin would disagree."
 
Stone needs professional help and some serious medication to overcome his obvious mental health issues.
 
"He fought the German war machine more than any single person"

Is this true?
 
I think that context is great. I think that it's entirely reasonable to try to understand someone, even if you despise her.

I am not at all concerned with that aspect of the approach. It's just that Stone has a long history of playing loose with facts and has a clear agenda. Those two things might make for an entertaining historical-based story, but... not for history.

The primary danger is that people will treat it as history, as people do with Jon Stewart on the Daily Show as news.

Ed O.
 
I think that context is great. I think that it's entirely reasonable to try to understand someone, even if you despise her.

I am not at all concerned with that aspect of the approach. It's just that Stone has a long history of playing loose with facts and has a clear agenda. Those two things might make for an entertaining historical-based story, but... not for history.

The primary danger is that people will treat it as history, as people do with Jon Stewart on the Daily Show as news.

Ed O.

D'oh!

Stone eventually hopes to send "Secret History" to schools as a teaching curriculum.

"It would be a very different counterweight to what they're learning," Stone said. "Nobody is going to force it down anybody's throat."
 
"He fought the German war machine more than any single person"

Is this true?

Yes it is true. He was pissed because it detracted from his purges. If he hadn't killed the top Military brains, he wouldn't have been in so much trouble initially.:crazy:
 
"He fought the German war machine more than any single person"

Is this true?

If you think signing a treaty with the Nazis (The Molotov/Ribbentrop pact) to divide Eastern Europe is fighting Hitler. He only fought Hitler when the Nazis tried to execute Operation Barbarossa.
 
You're right...but uh, the Nazi's did execute Barbarossa...and got to within sight of the Kremlin. One of the more impressive things in military history.

Of course, starting it 2 months late b/c Hitler flipped out on Yugoslavia was kind of a bonehead move.

And he was sending Hitler war materiel for 2 years---the tanks invading June 22, 1941 passed trains with Soviet supplies coming West to Berlin.
 
One thing that underscores a main difference b/w my belief system and that of many liberals...I believe that humans are, by nature, bad. Naturally depraved. By grace able to do good things. Stone seems to think that there's "understanding" and "context" about Hitler. There is: he's a depraved failure of a man who through an immensely improbable series of events (some of which were due to his genius) he was able to carve out for himself absolute power over the life and death of every person who lived in German-occupied territory. And along the way, whacked-out ideologies he'd invented for himself (or twisted from other clowns) were able to be implemented without the possibility of being stopped.

He wasn't an innocent soul who somehow did bad things. He was a depraved man (like all of us) whose power wasn't checked.
 
The U.S. contributed 1% as many WW2 deaths as the Soviet Union, 400 thousand to 40 million. Germany was defeated from the East, while the West bided their time until the Soviets had weakened Germany enough for the West to invade on D-Day. The right wing Hitler said he considered communism a far greater enemy than the capitalist West, whom he hated because they wouldn't fight Communism, and made the Eastern front his priority.

Nothing controversial about that--I think almost all historians agree.
 
I've been able to walk in Stalin's shoes and Hitler's shoes to understand their point of view. We're going to educate our minds and liberalize them and broaden them. We want to move beyond opinions
I loved this part.

So basically, he read a couple history books, found some overlooked nuances that complicate mainstream knowledge, and now thinks he's playing out the allegory of the cave. How does knowing about corporate American connections with Nazi Germany make Hitler any less of a lunatic? Is focusing on how Stalin defended himself against German aggression somehow supposed to balance out the millions of people he "purged?" History is an frustrating enough discipline as it is, without disconnected blowhards like Stone entering into the equation.

"History consists of cause and effect. I just blew your mind didn't I?"
 
Last edited:
The crazy thing is: there is more hard-and-fast documentation on the Third Reich than any other period, event or person in history. Diaries, dispatches, official documents, back-channel documents, important players, role players, transcripts, meeting minutes, etc...it's one thing to say you've come across something no one's ever seen before and to make it available for the masses, another completely to make "an Oliver Stone joint" about WWII and Hitler/Stalin a focus of 10 or so high-school classes.
 
Churchill fought the German war machine more than anyone else, and it's not close.

Russia was never Hitler's priority: not fighting a two-front war was. He got the Soviets to buy into the partition of Poland and watched them take over the Baltic states, attack Finland and carve up Eastern Europe while he was holding the French and British at bay in 1939. Then Russia stood by and watched (sending him war materiel) as he invaded the neutrality of Scandinavia and the Low Countries and took over France. Stalin didn't side with the Allies even when the Luftwaffe was conducting missions in Russia in the spring of 1941. Barbarossa was pushed back time and again b/c he hadn't completely conquered Britian and Greece was still holding out against Mussolini. He didn't even insist to the Japanese that they declare war against Russia when he declared war against the US after Pearl Harbor.

Sure, many more Russians than Americans died in WWII. Sure, Hitler hated the Russians and wanted the Lebensraum as well as the natural resources of Russia. But that doesn't make Stalin some kind of Anti-Nazi Hero.

"I've been able to walk in Hitler's and Stalin's shoes"?!? Tell me, Oliver, what does a megalomaniacal dictator with a penchant for holocaust think about? And how did McCarthy get lumped in with guys who killed millions of their own citizens?
 
You're right...but uh, the Nazi's did execute Barbarossa...and got to within sight of the Kremlin. One of the more impressive things in military history.

Fair point. I meant the objective didn't succeed, although it was attempted.
 
I'd like Oliver to walk in my father's father's family shoes. An entire side of my family was executed and dumped into a mass grave in Minsk in 1942 because of their religion. The Holocaust deserves no "context". It was evil, plain and simple.
 
Churchill fought the German war machine more than anyone else, and it's not close.

Russia was never Hitler's priority: not fighting a two-front war was. He got the Soviets to buy into the partition of Poland and watched them take over the Baltic states, attack Finland and carve up Eastern Europe while he was holding the French and British at bay in 1939. Then Russia stood by and watched (sending him war materiel) as he invaded the neutrality of Scandinavia and the Low Countries and took over France. Stalin didn't side with the Allies even when the Luftwaffe was conducting missions in Russia in the spring of 1941. Barbarossa was pushed back time and again b/c he hadn't completely conquered Britian and Greece was still holding out against Mussolini. He didn't even insist to the Japanese that they declare war against Russia when he declared war against the US after Pearl Harbor.

Sure, many more Russians than Americans died in WWII. Sure, Hitler hated the Russians and wanted the Lebensraum as well as the natural resources of Russia. But that doesn't make Stalin some kind of Anti-Nazi Hero.

"I've been able to walk in Hitler's and Stalin's shoes"?!? Tell me, Oliver, what does a megalomaniacal dictator with a penchant for holocaust think about? And how did McCarthy get lumped in with guys who killed millions of their own citizens?

This.
 
"History consists of cause and effect. I just blew your mind didn't I?"


History consisting of cause and effect is a deterministic argument. What should blow your mind is that the great majority of people DO NOT understand the nature of cause and effect in history or in anything else. The great majority believes in superstitious control mechanisms that allow free will to be executed. They miss out on subtleties and fine data that might explain rationally why things happen and give favor to simplified reasoning that fits in with their favored point of view. So, the statement, "history consists of cause and effect" is actually quite brilliant when you consider the ignorance of the masses; their continual denial of truth in favor of rosy red pictures and self-assuredness.
 
I'd like Oliver to walk in my father's father's family shoes. An entire side of my family was executed and dumped into a mass grave in Minsk in 1942 because of their religion. The Holocaust deserves no "context". It was evil, plain and simple.

Nothing "deserves" context. It's not any sort of compliment to contextualize. It doesn't excuse crimes or prevent the application of terms like "evil".

If others aren't at all interested in learning more about the system that arose (it was NOT just Hitler, and it was NOT something that could have happened just anywhere at any time) then... OK.

I don't see why or how it follows that Stone should have to be executed and dumped into a mass grave, though.

Ed O.
 
Just saw a special on the History Channel about the JFK assassination. The real historians on that show ragged on Stone's JFK movie for spewing a bunch of bogus things that people now accept as fact. Including attributing speeches to Jim Garrison that he never made.

The expectation is that he'll equally play loose with the truth in this film.

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/home.htm

And in particular:

http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/jfkmovie.htm

The following is adapted from notes prepared by attorney Mark Zaid for a 1993 course on the Kennedy Assassination taught at Hudson Valley Community College, New York. The list has been supplemented by John McAdams, Eric Paddon, Russ Burr, and Patricia Lambert's book False Witness. It's a very partial account of ways in which Stone tampered with the historical record.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top