Olshey plans to get into the draft

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Huh - totally disagree with you here. Meyers is nothing BUT a C. And Ed Davis is better suited to PF, than C - he's way too undersized, despite the fight he puts up.

I think what confuses people is that the injured guy is better suited on offense as a 4 because he gets a rash when he gets below the free throw line. He sucks defensively, but sucks less guarding bigger slower centers. So because of his offense, people say "he's a stretch 4"
 
Olshey is just saying he wants to get into the draft to keep Paul Allen happy.
 
Huh - totally disagree with you here. Meyers is nothing BUT a C. And Ed Davis is better suited to PF, than C - he's way too undersized, despite the fight he puts up.

I agree with this; Meyers is at his best when he's defending a big beefy center and when the big beefy center has to defend him, precisely because he has C size and SF shooting. Ed Davisis Brian Grant; yeah you can play him at center, but he's too undersized to fight big beefy centers.
 
Oh oh, Paul Allen found a player he wants to draft. Get ready for some draft night fireworks combined with Olshey’s world famous smoke and mirrors magic moves.

Last season, the Blazers basically got out of the draft. They traded pick #23 Rondae Hollis-Jefferson, (& Steve Blake), for Mason and Pat. Then Olshey stashed his second round pick in the Euro league.

Wonder which player in this draft PA & NO have targeted?
 
Last edited:
Yep but we cannot actually trade Meyers for Thon.
It'd be mad to give away a future 1st and Plumlee for Maker. Plumlee will be better than Maker for the next couple of seasons, and I actually like Maker's potential.
I agree. Thon is rated at about #40 in mock drafts; it definitely won't take that much to get him. Not even the future 1st, I hope. A future second (or two) and cash hopefully.
 
Also on Thon, he is so raw that I wouldn't expect any kind of significant contribution until his third year in the league. They might also be thinking about Prince Ibeh, a physical beast who might be more ready, but does he have the motor? (props to RR7 for taking note of him). These guys both slated for the 40's in the draft.
 
I think what confuses people is that the injured guy is better suited on offense as a 4 because he gets a rash when he gets below the free throw line. He sucks defensively, but sucks less guarding bigger slower centers. So because of his offense, people say "he's a stretch 4"
I feel that position in the front-court is defined by your defensive assignment (if you guard the post/paint you're a C even if you play the perimeter on offense), and position in the back-court is defined by what you do on offense (if you are the primary ball-handler you're a PG even though you may guard the opposition's SG).

Offensively it doesn't matter whether the PF or C plays in the paint or mid-range/perimeter, as long as their range compliments their counterpart. Meyers can't guard PFs, therefore he's a C.
 
One new thing I got from this article; Olshey seems to think Leonard's only problem is his lack of confidence. To me, this means he will probably try to keep him.
I think that it's pretty much a forgone conclusion that we're keeping Meyers. I think his injury AND restricted status will keep teams from throwing big offers at him. And letting an asset - especially one with his skills - walk for nothing would be bad asset management.
Also, I agree that confidence - along with over-thinking - is/are Meyers' only problem/s. As he gets more and more experience he'll improve on those issues. And even with those issues, the team often performed better with him on the floor.
 
That just means he opened a window in the office and moved a couple of chairs

I call BS on this post. Paul Allen does not open windows and move chairs.

Using his Interoperability fully automated system, Paul Allen prepares the most comfortable atmosphere and seating arrangements. His program also automatically adjusts the firmness of the chair cushions to the preference of each occupant. This automatically happens, sensors initiate the process before he or anyone else enters a room. Of course energy savings is also a big factor in determining the best window and chair positions. His program uses satellite weather data to project the energy use for every seating and window option.
 
I call BS on this post. Paul Allen does not open windows and move chairs.

Using his Interoperability fully automated system, Paul Allen prepares the most comfortable atmosphere and seating arrangements. His program also automatically adjusts the firmness of the chair cushions to the preference of each occupant. This automatically happens, sensors initiate the process before he or anyone else enters a room. Of course energy savings is also a big factor in determining the best window and chair positions. His program uses satellite weather data to project the energy use for every seating and window option.
How does it deal with a potential crop dusting though?
 
Salary and expectations are key when I evaluate Meyers. He turned out way better than I thought when we drafted him. (Very low expectations) And as long as he is not over paid I would like to keep him on the team. He has offensive skills that few 7'1" player possess. He can help our team, especially as a bench player.

But because he was a lottery pick, i think the expectations for him are too high. They might be too high for him and his agent too.
But if the coaches and Meyers can finally figure out what his role actually is, and everyone is happy with it....again, he can help us.

In my mind he is a stretch center. Put him in the high post a la Marcus Camby and let him pass and shoot from there.
 
Also, I agree that confidence - along with over-thinking - is/are Meyers' only problem/s. As he gets more and more experience he'll improve on those issues. And even with those issues, the team often performed better with him on the floor.

I made a post a month or two ago where I thought Meyers' biggest problem is he's TOO coachable - meaning he focuses totally on the last thing the coaches told him, to the exclusion of other things he's capable of doing.

After the MEM series, he was labeled a stretch-4 who can spread the floor with his 3-point shooting. So, at the beginning of last season ALL he did was camp out at the 3-point line and hoist shots. Against SAC, someone told him he needed to bang with Boogie and get in his head, and that's exactly what he did. If you go back to last April, in the make up game against BRK, when Aldridge and Kaman didn't make the trip, someone must have told Meyers he needs to step up, score in the paint and rebound to make up for their absence.

He's capable of doing all of these things. He has a great shooting touch from anywhere on the court, he actually has some excellent low post foot work - on the rare occasions he actually tries to post up, he can be a dominant rebounder, especially on the defensive end, when he focuses on it and he can also be a very strong low post defender against the likes of Marc Gasol, Deandre Jordan and Boogie Cousins.

He can do all of these things well, but the problem is he hasn't been able to put them all together. He needs to stop thinking of himself in a specific role and just start thinking of himself as a basketball player who can do multiple things to help his team. He needs to learn to recognize mismatches and exploit them - if he's being guarded by a big center like Gasol or Jordan, draw them out of the paint with his 3-point shooting. If he has a smaller PF on him, like Thaddeus Young, get your ass down on the low block and punish him with your size. Same thing on the pick and roll. If they trap Dame or C.J. or switch and you end up with a guard on you, dive to the basket and exploit that mismatch.

Meyers is still pretty young and a few years away from entering his prime. As others have noted, he has improved specific individual skills and the way he spaces the floor does benefit the team by creating openings for his teammates. He just needs to put it all together and stop over-thinking his role. I don't want to overpay him, but I also don't want to lose him for nothing. Neil and the coaches know him way better than anyone here. They know what he works on in practice and the off season. They know his strengths and weaknesses. He's no longer a total unknown. I'm sure they'll take that all into consideration, along with any offer sheet he may be offered and make the best decision for the team.

BNM
 
I made a post a month or two ago where I thought Meyers' biggest problem is he's TOO coachable - meaning he focuses totally on the last thing the coaches told him, to the exclusion of other things he's capable of doing.

After the MEM series, he was labeled a stretch-4 who can spread the floor with his 3-point shooting. So, at the beginning of last season ALL he did was camp out at the 3-point line and hoist shots. Against SAC, someone told him he needed to bang with Boogie and get in his head, and that's exactly what he did. If you go back to last April, in the make up game against BRK, when Aldridge and Kaman didn't make the trip, someone must have told Meyers he needs to step up, score in the paint and rebound to make up for their absence.

He's capable of doing all of these things. He has a great shooting touch from anywhere on the court, he actually has some excellent low post foot work - on the rare occasions he actually tries to post up, he can be a dominant rebounder, especially on the defensive end, when he focuses on it and he can also be a very strong low post defender against the likes of Marc Gasol, Deandre Jordan and Boogie Cousins.

He can do all of these things well, but the problem is he hasn't been able to put them all together. He needs to stop thinking of himself in a specific role and just start thinking of himself as a basketball player who can do multiple things to help his team. He needs to learn to recognize mismatches and exploit them - if he's being guarded by a big center like Gasol or Jordan, draw them out of the paint with his 3-point shooting. If he has a smaller PF on him, like Thaddeus Young, get your ass down on the low block and punish him with your size. Same thing on the pick and roll. If they trap Dame or C.J. or switch and you end up with a guard on you, dive to the basket and exploit that mismatch.

Meyers is still pretty young and a few years away from entering his prime. As others have noted, he has improved specific individual skills and the way he spaces the floor does benefit the team by creating openings for his teammates. He just needs to put it all together and stop over-thinking his role. I don't want to overpay him, but I also don't want to lose him for nothing. Neil and the coaches know him way better than anyone here. They know what he works on in practice and the off season. They know his strengths and weaknesses. He's no longer a total unknown. I'm sure they'll take that all into consideration, along with any offer sheet he may be offered and make the best decision for the team.

BNM

Great post. And still my favorite current Blazer.
We will keep him and he will blossom.
 
Salary and expectations are key when I evaluate Meyers. He turned out way better than I thought when we drafted him. (Very low expectations) And as long as he is not over paid I would like to keep him on the team. He has offensive skills that few 7'1" player possess. He can help our team, especially as a bench player.

But because he was a lottery pick, i think the expectations for him are too high. They might be too high for him and his agent too.
But if the coaches and Meyers can finally figure out what his role actually is, and everyone is happy with it....again, he can help us.

In my mind he is a stretch center. Put him in the high post a la Marcus Camby and let him pass and shoot from there.

I really thought he was the missing piece during the first two games of the LAC series. He has the size to bang with Deandre down low on the defensive end and the shooting range to draw Deandre out of the paint on the offensive end. Fortunately, without him, Terry realized putting Mason in the high post, even though Mason doesn't have anything close to Meyers' shooting touch, would be effective against the Clippers. Like Mason, Meyers has good ball handling and passing skills for a center. Unlike Mason, Meyers also has no problem knocking down a mid-range jumper f the defense sags off him.

BNM
 
Meyers plays like blossom.
a5134ed744a752774ae09bda464ebf47.jpg
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top