Oregon Voting

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Where in the Holy Book does it say you shouldn't smoke marijuana?
More importantly, where in the Holy Book does it say that entrance via the narrow gate is dependent on how you live your life? Isn't it supposed to be dependent on His life (and death, and resurrection)? How would smoking impact that?
 
More importantly, where in the Holy Book does it say that entrance via the narrow gate is dependent on how you live your life? Isn't it supposed to be dependent on His life (and death, and resurrection)? How would smoking impact that?

HE doesn't like the smell of skunk.
 
Chris Dudley should have ran again, he was much better than the crazy Southern Oregon republican that's running now. People up north aren't going to vote for a republican like that no matter how bad the current governor is.
 
I have never smoked weed in my life, but not voting for it to be legalized is asinine. The tax implications alone would be worth it
 
Good on you my man! With only one live to live, there is no need to waste it on something so frivolous.

One man's frivolous is another man's enormous sailboat.

barfo
 
86 - N (because I read that the legislature can take from this fund in certain cases, and I do not trust the politicians to not dip into this money, so basically its just another slush-fund in my eyes)

87 - N (I believe there are too many potential conflict of interests here)

88 - N (and not just a no, an emphatic, FUCK NO)

89 - Y (I wasn't quite sure what the hell this was about, I read quite a few "For" arguments and kept thinking to myself, how is this not already the way it is? Someone please explain if you can...)

90 - N (Keep it the way it is...)

91 - Y (Yes, because LEO's spend far to much time and money on busting stupid petty stuff; their time and effort can hopefully be moved elsewhere, also because I do not care if people smoke, it's no worse than tobacco, or alcohol IMO)

92 - Y (I do not care the cost, more information of what goes into food the better, this is a start. It may not be the best, but at least it's a start. There are way to many "extras" in our food now and that is evident by the "health food store" / "Farmers market" revival.)
 
Measure 86 - No

Measure 87 - No

Measure 88 - No

Measure 89 - No

Measure 90 - No

Measure 91 - Yes

Measure 92 - No
 
I voted for a republican other than Ron Paul for once. Carl Demaio. Gay republican. Democrats ran lots of smear ads against him so me must be really good.

I voted for Jerry Brown. He cooks the books better than republicans do.
 
Where in the Holy Book does it say you shouldn't smoke marijuana?

It don't think it does. Just like it doesn't say anything about drinking . It's ok to drink within reason. I'm sure it's the same for marijuana. I think voting a certain way signifies that you agree with the direction a society is headed or don't. You either agree with it or don't. This here gets lumped in with everything we have tried to make 'ok'.
 
It don't think it does. Just like it doesn't say anything about drinking . It's ok to drink within reason. I'm sure it's the same for marijuana. I think voting a certain way signifies that you agree with the direction a society is headed or don't. You either agree with it or don't. This here gets lumped in with everything we have tried to make 'ok'.

So I take it you agree with the direction society is headed, since you voted not to make a change?

Puzzling logic.

barfo
 
Only barfo could get lost in that turn.

Lost? No. Just amused by "We're on the wrong track! Let's not change anything!"

barfo
 
Where in the Holy Book does it say you shouldn't smoke marijuana?

It doesn't. As a matter of fact one could make an argument that God says it's ok to smoke.

Genesis 1:29
And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat.
 
Good to see that lots of you are voting no on 90.
 
Lost? No. Just amused by "We're on the wrong track! Let's not change anything!"

barfo

It beats, "we've fucked it up with bad policies, let's do it more."
 
It beats, "we've fucked it up with bad policies, let's do it more."

Of course, the ballot measure we are actually discussing here is an issue where you and I agree, I believe.

barfo
 
Polls haven't closed yet, so, no. Plus I don't think even if it passes, it has immediate effect.

barfo

Libertarian policy. Unthinkable 15 yeas ago.
 
Chris Henry of the Progressive Party for Governor.

Libertarians for most other slots due only to their opposition to NSA/DHS/TSA intrusions and support of most basic freedoms. No other party currently comes close to showing any concern for the freedoms we have seen infringed or "outlawed".

No on 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, because I read and understood what they actually would do.

Yes on 91 and 92 because they are both a huge step in the right direction.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top