OT: And The Butler Plot Thickens ...

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Anybody that thinks teams are going to give up more than a mediocre player for Outlaw and Blake in some kind of trade are seriously deluding themselves. These teams have scouts you know (well except for the Grizz) and it's a poorly kept secret that while both have had turns at being productive players, they both have some pretty serious holes in their game.

For instance, Battier is well regarded as one of the true lockdown wing defenders in the league, he may be on the tail end of his career and not nearly as productive as he's been in the past; Blake+Outlaw =/= Battier in my opinion. I just don't see how GMs like Ernie Grunfeld or Daryl Morey are giving up guys like Butler or Battier without at least getting a good young prospect in the deal, even though Blake and Outlaw are expiring deals pairing those two together in a trade package is highly unlikely to blow anyone's skirt up.

Start using names like Nicolas, Rudy, Bayless, and/or Miller in some combination with either Blake or Outlaw and I think you start to maybe catch somebody's interest.

Miller and Battier make virtually the same amount of money. As much as I would hate to trade Miller, I could see that trade happening. Houston gets a point guard who will feed Yao and we get a small forward that shoots, plays D, and doesn't make stupid decisions.
 
Anybody that thinks teams are going to give up more than a mediocre player for Outlaw and Blake in some kind of trade are seriously deluding themselves. These teams have scouts you know (well except for the Grizz) and it's a poorly kept secret that while both have had turns at being productive players, they both have some pretty serious holes in their game.

For instance, Battier is well regarded as one of the true lockdown wing defenders in the league, he may be on the tail end of his career and not nearly as productive as he's been in the past but Blake+Outlaw =/= Battier in my opinion. I just don't see how GMs like Ernie Grunfeld or Daryl Morey are giving up guys like Butler or Battier without at least getting a good young prospect in the deal.

Start using names like Nicolas, Rudy, Bayless, and/or Miller in some combination with either Blake or Outlaw and I think you start to maybe catch somebody's interest; even though Blake and Outlaw are expiring deals pairing those two together in a trade package is highly unlikely to blow anyone's skirt up..

I think people are convinced that expiring contracts have enormous value, despite that not turning out to be true last year (and it wasn't just LaFrentz...Cleveland had an equally good expiring contract in Sczerbiak and couldn't find a good deal).

I think expiring contracts can be part of a deal for an impact player, but that package had better also have real player value...which means including some combination of Bayless, Batum and Fernandez.
 
Miller and Battier make virtually the same amount of money. As much as I would hate to trade Miller, I could see that trade happening. Houston gets a point guard who will feed Yao and we get a small forward that shoots, plays D, and doesn't make stupid decisions.

I feel exactly the same way you do. I think Miller on the team has been incredibly important to Oden's development (psychologically, if not physically), but I can't imagine Dre being real happy with his situation here. On the upside, Battier is used to playing with a dominant big like Yao and one would think those instincts he developed as a spot up shooter and post entry passer would serve him well if he came to Portland.

The only question I have is that Brooks and Lowry seem to play pretty well as their 1-2 punch at the point guard spot; do they really need or want Miller?
 
I feel exactly the same way you do. I think Miller on the team has been incredibly important to Oden's development (psychologically, if not physically), but I can't imagine Dre being real happy with his situation here. On the upside, Battier is used to playing with a dominant big like Yao and one would think those instincts he developed as a spot up shooter and post entry passer would serve him well if he came to Portland.

The only question I have is that Brooks and Lowry seem to play pretty well as their 1-2 punch at the point guard spot; do they really need or want Miller?

I'm just going off what I've heard from Rocket fans. While Brooks is an amazing scorer, he has supposedly been terrible at getting Yao the ball. When Yao comes back, I imagine they would love to have a point guard who feeds the post. Maybe we could pry Lowry away from them. I don't know.
 
I'm just going off what I've heard from Rocket fans. While Brooks is an amazing scorer, he has supposedly been terrible at getting Yao the ball. When Yao comes back, I imagine they would love to have a point guard who feeds the post. Maybe we could pry Lowry away from them. I don't know.

I really like Lowry's defense (a true ball-hawk) but his shooting from distance is pretty spotty, which would seem to put us right back in the same position we are right now with Miller, that said I'd probably take him if the Rockets were offering him. My guess however is that Morey prizes him pretty highly, especially after being able to steal him for a song from Memphis.
 
I really like Lowry's defense (a true ball-hawk) but his shooting from distance is pretty spotty, which would seem to put us right back in the same position we are right now with Miller, that said I'd probably take him if the Rockets were offering him. My guess however is that Morey prizes him pretty highly, especially after being able to steal him for a song from Memphis.

It's really quite sad that we haven't stolen any players from Chris Wallace. I wonder if he hides under his desk every time KP tries to call him.

Secretary: "Mr. Wallace, I have Kevin Pritchard on the line."

Chris Wallace crawls under his desk.

Wallace: "Tell him I moved away."

Secretary: "Moved away?"

Wallace: "Yeah... tell him I moved to Abu Dhabi."

Secretary: "Okay..."
 
Chris Wallace's secretary is not in the office getting calls. She is on an away mission, acting as an advanced scout.
 
It's really quite sad that we haven't stolen any players from Chris Wallace. I wonder if he hides under his desk every time KP tries to call him.

Secretary: "Mr. Wallace, I have Kevin Pritchard on the line."

Chris Wallace crawls under his desk.

Wallace: "Tell him I moved away."

Secretary: "Moved away?"

Wallace: "Yeah... tell him I moved to Abu Dhabi."

Secretary: "Okay..."

Ahahahaha!

I wonder if he checks his car to see if the break lines have been cut whenever the Blazers roll into town?
 
Ahahahaha!

I wonder if he checks his car to see if the break lines have been cut whenever the Blazers roll into town?

No, but I'm pretty sure he makes his wife check under the bed and in the closet.

Chris Wallace and his wife climb into bed. He turns off the light.

KP: "Hello Chris. Why haven't you been taking my calls?"

Wallace: "Damnit honey, I thought I told you to check in the closet!"

Wife: "I did!"

Chris Wallace turns on the light.

Kevin Pritchard steps out from behind the curtain.

KP: "Chris I will trade you Steve Blake and Travis Outlaw for...."

Chris Wallace runs out of the room screaming.

KP: "You can't hide from me forever Chris."
 
I think people are convinced that expiring contracts have enormous value, despite that not turning out to be true last year (and it wasn't just LaFrentz...Cleveland had an equally good expiring contract in Sczerbiak and couldn't find a good deal).

I think expiring contracts can be part of a deal for an impact player, but that package had better also have real player value...which means including some combination of Bayless, Batum and Fernandez.

Agreed. The team needs to consider "selling high" on Rudy. IMHO that would be the Blazers' most realistic chance to swing a deal for an above average SF. (FWIW, Deng would be high on my list as well)
 
Anybody think Rudy, Miller and Mills for Battier and Lowry would get the Rocket's attention? I can never quite tell if a proposed trade seems all that realistic when I type it out. I can only go off of my gut feeling that I think the Blazers are giving up some pretty hard to part with assets, except that each team gets a productive if declining player and an intriguing youngster in return ... and each fills a hole in their lineup.

Somehow I think Adelman and Morey would absolutely love Rudy's game, would like a solid savvy veteran to backup their young point (or lead for a couple of years as the case may be?) and something tells me Nate would appreciate Lowry and Battier's on ball and perimeter defense to help offset the team's fairly porous perimeter.

Blazers end up with:
Blake/Lowry (I think Lowry would soak up a lot of minutes however)
Roy/Bayless
Battier/Webster/(Batum)
LMA/Dante/(Outlaw)
Greg/Przy

Rockets end up with:
Brooks/Miller (or maybe vice versa?)
Rudy/Ariza/(T-Mac)
Ariza/Budinger
Scola/Landry
Hayes/Andersen/(Yao)

Does this pass the sniff test?
 
i thin rudy has alot of value going to a team that is going to start him. he could instantly be a star on the right team, like new york.
 
No, but I'm pretty sure he makes his wife check under the bed and in the closet.

Chris Wallace and his wife climb into bed. He turns off the light.

KP: "Hello Chris. Why haven't you been taking my calls?"

Wallace: "Damnit honey, I thought I told you to check in the closet!"

Wife: "I did!"

Chris Wallace turns on the light.

Kevin Pritchard steps out from behind the curtain.

KP: "Chris I will trade you Steve Blake and Travis Outlaw for...."

Chris Wallace runs out of the room screaming.

KP: "You can't hide from me forever Chris."

You're killing me dude. I'd rep you but apparently I must spread some reputation around.
 
My asking was mostly a rhetorical question to see how homer-ish the fans are... Both players are bitching about having to reduce their role for the supposed betterment of the team. I see very little difference other than the Blazers having a lot more overall talent to fall back on while sorting the mess out.
 
Anybody think Rudy, Miller and Mills for Battier and Lowry would get the Rocket's attention? I can never quite tell if a proposed trade seems all that realistic when I type it out. I can only go off of my gut feeling that I think the Blazers are giving up some pretty hard to part with assets, except that each team gets a productive if declining player and an intriguing youngster in return ... and each fills a hole in their lineup.

Somehow I think Adelman and Morey would absolutely love Rudy's game, would like a solid savvy veteran to backup their young point (or lead for a couple of years as the case may be?) and something tells me Nate would appreciate Lowry and Battier's on ball and perimeter defense to help offset the team's fairly porous perimeter.

Blazers end up with:
Blake/Lowry (I think Lowry would soak up a lot of minutes however)
Roy/Bayless
Battier/Webster/(Batum)
LMA/Dante/(Outlaw)
Greg/Przy

Rockets end up with:
Brooks/Miller (or maybe vice versa?)
Rudy/Ariza/(T-Mac)
Ariza/Budinger
Scola/Landry
Hayes/Andersen/(Yao)

Does this pass the sniff test?
You made a horrible error. It's right there in blake and white...whoops I mean black and white. No I guess I did mean Blake. Can't we like just give them Blake you know for a sack of half eaten peanuts? I'd rather keep Mills as he at least isn't hurting us being in a cast and all.

PG Lowry/Bayless
SG Roy/Bayless/Battier
SF Battier/Webster (Batum when he returns)
PF LMA/Cunningham
C Oden/Przybilla

I would also try and get a PF out of the Rockets while you're at it considering they have like 5,000 of them.

I haven't trade checked it but how about Rudy/Outlaw/Blake/Miller for Battier/Lowry/backup PF. I wonder if the Rockets would part with Hayes if we gave the Przybilla instead of Miller. I definitely like the looks of

PG Miller/Lowry
SG Roy/Bayless
SF Battier/Webster (Batum when he returns)
PF LMA/Hayes/Cunningham
C Oden/LMA/Hayes
 
I don't think I'd trade for Battier because he's 31. Butler will be 30 in March. Deng, for example is only 24. Doesn't mean he's got to be the guy to target, but I look at this team and think, basically, you can't hang onto all those "asset" players forever without it getting prohibitively expensive. So you have basically one chance to get a guy who's going to be a long-term starter. Because of that, I think you want to get a guy who's around the same age as your other key pieces. Battier's a hell of a player, but he's only going to be a hell of a player for a couple years.

In short, aim high.

Regarding Deng, I'm not sure the Bulls would trade him, and I'm not sold on him as a wonderful fit for anyone because of his injury history. Did you all know his contract isn't fully insured? That's one reason I want him traded from my Bulls while his value is high. But I'm not scared enough that I'd trade him for nothing either. It's a tough spot to be in. Bottom line is I'd want Rudy + expiring contracts from the Blazers.

From a Blazers perspective, I'd be looking at other younger SFs. Jeff Green? Iguodala (high price tag, I'm sure)? Rudy Gay?
 
Regarding Deng, I'm not sure the Bulls would trade him, and I'm not sold on him as a wonderful fit for anyone because of his injury history. Did you all know his contract isn't fully insured? That's one reason I want him traded from my Bulls while his value is high. But I'm not scared enough that I'd trade him for nothing either. It's a tough spot to be in. Bottom line is I'd want Rudy + expiring contracts from the Blazers.

From a Blazers perspective, I'd be looking at other younger SFs. Jeff Green? Iguodala (high price tag, I'm sure)? Rudy Gay?

So you're saying that Rudy/Blake/Outlaw would be fair value for Deng?
 
I don't think I'd trade for Battier because he's 31. Butler will be 30 in March. Deng, for example is only 24. Doesn't mean he's got to be the guy to target, but I look at this team and think, basically, you can't hang onto all those "asset" players forever without it getting prohibitively expensive. So you have basically one chance to get a guy who's going to be a long-term starter. Because of that, I think you want to get a guy who's around the same age as your other key pieces. Battier's a hell of a player, but he's only going to be a hell of a player for a couple years.

In short, aim high.

The Blazers seem to have a pretty good small forward wing defender hanging around on the IR in Nic Batum. I'm super high on him because of his length, upside, and pretty efficient scoring when he started last year. Presumably he'll be back by around March after his torn labrum. Longterm I'd be looking at starting Battier for the next couple of years, with Batum learning from the master and taking over the starting gig as Battier heads off to the glue factory.

Regarding Deng, I'm not sure the Bulls would trade him, and I'm not sold on him as a wonderful fit for anyone because of his injury history. Did you all know his contract isn't fully insured? That's one reason I want him traded from my Bulls while his value is high. But I'm not scared enough that I'd trade him for nothing either. It's a tough spot to be in. Bottom line is I'd want Rudy + expiring contracts from the Blazers.

From a Blazers perspective, I'd be looking at other younger SFs. Jeff Green? Iguodala (high price tag, I'm sure)? Rudy Gay?

Deng's price tag and injury history make me a little leery (OK, a lot leery!) but skill-wise I'd love to have him. He can play power forward in small lineups (which Nate likes to use a lot) he's got a pretty good midrange game, seems to be an OK defender and I love his rebounding for his position.

Otherwise of the rest of those guys, I suppose I'd be most interested in Jeff Green if only because he can pay flex forward and shoots pretty well from three (a skill necessary for a Nate McMillan small forward), Gay is going to be a restricted free agent and seems to think he's worth a huge payday and Iggy's lack of shooting from range would make him a less than an ideal fit.

As for the Rudy + expiring contracts I'd probably do it, I'm just not sure my team's GM would; Regardless, the Blazers have 1.4 million in cap room so the combo of Rudy, Blake and Outlaw would work just fine in the trade checker. Outlaw is on the shelf probably for the bulk of the season, but you'd get at least one useful role player in Blake and Rudy would be the shooting guard with range your team seems to be desperate for.
 
As for the Rudy + expiring contracts I'd probably do it, I'm just not sure my team's GM would

I'd certainly do Rudy/Blake/Outlaw for Deng. Of course, it's not my money, so it's easy for me to commit the Blazers to the big contract. But since I don't think the team will have any more chances to add an impact or possible impact player, I think it's fine from a franchise health point of view. It's just a question of whether Allen is willing to pay Deng's contract in addition to the large contracts of Roy, Aldridge and, eventually, Oden.

I wouldn't blame him if it was too much to swallow.
 
I'd certainly do Rudy/Blake/Outlaw for Deng. Of course, it's not my money, so it's easy for me to commit the Blazers to the big contract. But since I don't think the team will have any more chances to add an impact or possible impact player, I think it's fine from a franchise health point of view. It's just a question of whether Allen is willing to pay Deng's contract in addition to the large contracts of Roy, Aldridge and, eventually, Oden.

I wouldn't blame him if it was too much to swallow.

Yeah, with PA's health very much in question and the Vulcans apparently interested in getting this team into the black (and his primary heir, his sister) I somehow think the Spurs model is going to extend to the management of the cap and not just KP's methods of talent evaluation/team building.

I somehow get the feeling we're about to embark on the "Roy, Aldridge, Oden and cheap/old roleplayers" tour.
 
Yeah, with PA's health very much in question and the Vulcans apparently interested in getting this team into the black (and his primary heir, his sister) I somehow think the Spurs model is going to extend to the management of the cap and not just KP's methods of talent evaluation/team building.

I somehow get the feeling we're about to embark on the "Roy, Aldridge, Oden and cheap/old roleplayers" tour.

Man.... that would really suck.
 
So you're saying that Rudy/Blake/Outlaw would be fair value for Deng?

Yes. If I were GM of the Bulls, I'd make that trade. It creates an extra $10M of cap space for us next year, and gives us a potential long-run starter at our 2 guard spot. We move Salmons to the 3 and remain competitive this year, not losing so much that we can't attract good free agents.

For the Blazers, I'd pull the trigger too. Deng's injury probability is the only risk I see, but it's somewhat minimized by the Blazers depth and by Paul Allen's willingness to spend his way out of trouble should the need arise. Not saying that's an infinite willingness, but there's a lot more from him than from Jerry Reinsdorf (a fact that makes Deng that much more dangerous as a Bull, because a non-productive big salary hurts more when you won't increase your spending to compensate). So the Blazers can afford to look at it simply from a basketball perspective. And from that perspective, Deng is a good defender, has a nice complementary offensive game, is a team player, a great guy off the court, and is the right age. He's also effective in smaller lineups playing the 4. He's a hell of a rebounder.

A team of
Miller, Bayless
Roy, Webster
Deng, Batum
Aldridge
Oden, Przybilla

Gives you a really solid looking 9 man rotation with room for growth for years to come.
 
Yes. If I were GM of the Bulls, I'd make that trade. It creates an extra $10M of cap space for us next year, and gives us a potential long-run starter at our 2 guard spot.

You mean, Dwyane Wade?

I love Rudy and all, but if only he could be happy being a sparkplug off the bench, I think that's the ideal role for him. I would be amazed if somebody that slight could play mega minutes in the league. Every team with a SG of average NBA size would immediately target him.

Why can't you just give us Deng for Outlaw, Blake and Webster or Bayless? You don't want Rudy, trust me.
 
The Blazers seem to have a pretty good small forward wing defender hanging around on the IR in Nic Batum. I'm super high on him because of his length, upside, and pretty efficient scoring when he started last year. Presumably he'll be back by around March after his torn labrum. Longterm I'd be looking at starting Battier for the next couple of years, with Batum learning from the master and taking over the starting gig as Battier heads off to the glue factory.

Otherwise of the rest of those guys, I suppose I'd be most interested in Jeff Green if only because he can pay flex forward and shoots pretty well from three (a skill necessary for a Nate McMillan small forward), Gay is going to be a restricted free agent and seems to think he's worth a huge payday and Iggy's lack of shooting from range would make him a less than an ideal fit.

+1, I think Battier would fit well BECAUSE of his age, I'm not looking to add another huge payday guy or give up on Batum yet.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top