OT: Artest wants to be traded

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

santeesioux

Just keep on scrolling by
Joined
Dec 3, 2008
Messages
10,752
Likes
5,333
Points
113
Didn't some of you guys want him a while back?

Ron Artest hopes to to be traded before the Feb. 24th deadline, according to a source.

Artest's agent David Bauman declined comment.

Artest played just 5.5 seconds of the fourth quarter and overtime in Tuesday's game against Houston.

Another item of concern for Artest is the limit to what he is allowed to do offensively. Artest is almost always the fourth or fifth option when it comes to scoring.

Artest is also weary of being blamed for the struggles of Lakers.

http://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/210541/Arest_Hopes_To_Be_Traded
 
Good for him. Too bad LA signed him for 5 years, when three should have gotten it done.
 
I liked him, but with that salary and his obvious decline, he's a bad gamble. The Lakers are almost definitely stuck with him.
 
You get the good (defense) with the bad (crazy) with Artest.

The good, though, will fade over time, while the bad will just get worse.

Ed O.
 
You get the good (defense) with the bad (crazy) with Artest.

You get the good (defense) with the bad (low efficiency scorer) and the crazy (crazy) with Artest.

The good is already fading, IMO...he's no longer a great defender, merely a solid one. The bad is getting worse and the crazy seems unpredictable (a common trait in crazy).

So, call me Andre Miller, but I'd pass.
 
Didn't some of you guys want him a while back?

I was all about trying to get him on a one or two year deal. At the time Batum was uncertain, Roy was an All-Star, Oden was projected to come back and kick ass. He seemed like the perfect fit for a team of choir boys that needed one piece to push them into being contenders.

Some guys should never be handed a 5 year contract. Artest is the poster child for that rule.
 
I really don't see what Artest has supposedly done this time. A few years ago I would have said sure, Ron Artest is a headcase. But I see this as more of Artest not being a fit for their system. Artest can thrive in certain systems. He is always going to be a player that is confident and believes he deserves playing time and touches because of that confidence. He is obviously not happy because he is a 5th option there. It's not like he went out promoting a dog fight or something. Not a great fit for the triangle? Great welcome to the club. Most players aren't. That is why it has been successful in only a handful of scenarios.
 
He will end up like JR Rider! Kidnapping somebody for crack, killing a hooker... you name it! I'll be honest, I thought Rodman would be dead by now!
 
If Artest can't stay happy winning a title a title while playing for Phil Jackson, I'd say his time in the NBA as a productive player are about done.
 
I was all about trying to get him on a one or two year deal. At the time Batum was uncertain, Roy was an All-Star, Oden was projected to come back and kick ass. He seemed like the perfect fit for a team of choir boys that needed one piece to push them into being contenders.

Some guys should never be handed a 5 year contract. Artest is the poster child for that rule.

We need to include one more player in that poster. He's the one trying to block Artest's shot whose face is obscured.

81863342.jpg


Here's his face:

565895-darius_miles_large.jpg
 
Last edited:
Well, to be fair Miles' problem was a mix of attitude and disastrous knees. More so the knees. You can have the best attitude in the world and bad knees will make a bad contract. A la Brandon Roy.
 
Oh, Lord, Darius Miles. I didn't need to be reminded of him today.
 
Well, to be fair Miles' problem was a mix of attitude and disastrous knees. More so the knees. You can have the best attitude in the world and bad knees will make a bad contract. A la Brandon Roy.

Let's give Roy at least a small chance to play without burying him. Kobe Bryant said last month that he is basically bone-on-bone, and Chris Paul has the same condition. I'm not willing to take a dump on Roy before it is a given that he is worthless as a player.
 
Let's give Roy at least a small chance to play without burying him. Kobe Bryant said last month that he is basically bone-on-bone, and Chris Paul has the same condition. I'm not willing to take a dump on Roy before it is a given that he is worthless as a player.
I'm generally of the same opinion, but you'd have to figure some team would be willing to take a chance on him now. If he proves himself to be worthless, we're basically stuck with him....for the length of his contract.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top