espn_hall_of_famer
Active Member
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2009
- Messages
- 684
- Likes
- 47
- Points
- 28
What the fuck does it matter? What, I can't be at least a little bit frustrated that the Blazers didn't get Collison? People make fun of David Khan for having 3 PGs ... have they seen our roster? A crapload of "combo" guards, but only one true PG (who is well past the age of 30).
Even if by some miracle Oden plays 70+ games, this team is not a title contender.
I'd disagree with that last statement.
The Blazers true PG is not only their starting PG, but a top 10 PG in the league. And even through he is past 30, the playoffs are usually the time with guys past 30 rise above the guys 29 and under. The Lakers had a guy past 30 in Kobe and it worked for them. Boston had a couple guys past 30 and it worked for them to de-throne King James (under 29).
So that argument doesn't really hold true until maybe 11/12 when Miller is too old to keep the Blazer's dynasty going. We have time to worry above filling that void and letting our current guys become the "new vets" when we get there to get that new PG.


I never believed it was "Paul or Collison." That doesn't make sense...you don't determine the status of your future Hall of Fame point guard based on the presence of a decent player. It would be like deciding you can deal Kevin Durant with 1-2 years of team control left because you have Jeff Green.