You saw the headline and clicked on it. You read through it. You then came to this website and started a new thread for it. So, I guess YOU asked for it? WTF is your deal?
He's been out of prison for 2 years. She helped get him out.
Ah thanks for the clarification. I skimmed it and thought it said two years left.
So that debunks my hypothesis. Now I am as clueless as everyone else. But I think most everyone else was already aware of that!
True
The article said, "the prosecution in his initial trial had not given Irons’s defense fingerprint evidence that could have been used to argue his innocence". It was prosecutorial misconduct but that's usually not enough to get a conviction vacated. Usually the evidence that the prosecution didn't turn over in discovery has to be something that could prove the convict's innocence because the burden of proof after a conviction is on the convict not the state. So on the end of Irons and Moore it sounds like a really nice story where he was wrongfully convicted and then that was corrected with him going free and moving on with his life. Obviously @Paine Tablet doesn't like this sort of thing because "who asks for this"?
Knowing your previous history and political views, I get why this would anger you. Also, who gives a shit.
Brother, I’ve read some of your posts on here lately. Everything OK?
