OT: Gerald Wallace fined for flopping

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Haakzilla

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2008
Messages
9,495
Likes
7,553
Points
113
I'm suprised that the usual suspects aren't even fined yet.
 
I'm suprised that the usual suspects aren't even fined yet.

Why? Dirk has been injured and hasn't played yet this season. They'll probably send him down to the D League for a few games to adjust his flopping technique before calling him up to the new, stricter NBA.

BNM
 
you would think an example would be made on those that do it so frequently. Many of them aren't even superstars.

But many are, so if they crack down too hard the bias will be undeniable. Hate to say it but the NBA needs refs on the sideline, ie booth.
 
The only penalty for flopping should be the lack of a foul call. Take a dive, leave your man open to shoot. If the other team can't take advantage of a 5 on 4 situation, that's their fault. Fining the players the relative equivalent of a couple hundred bucks after the fact is ridiculous.
 
The only penalty for flopping should be the lack of a foul call. Take a dive, leave your man open to shoot. If the other team can't take advantage of a 5 on 4 situation, that's their fault. Fining the players the relative equivalent of a couple hundred bucks after the fact is ridiculous.

Just to put it in perspective if my math is right GW makes 10,000,000 this year and $5000 is .05% is his checks. If I make $60,000 then .05% of my checks would be $30. So stupid.
 
Is it just me or are only the "tough guys" getting stung by the new rule? I wouldn't have thought they'd be the ones primarily affected.
 
The only penalty for flopping should be the lack of a foul call. Take a dive, leave your man open to shoot. If the other team can't take advantage of a 5 on 4 situation, that's their fault. Fining the players the relative equivalent of a couple hundred bucks after the fact is ridiculous.

But the rule is so that when a ref does call a foul because he misses that the guy actually wasn't fouled hard there is some penalty later.
 
But the rule is so that when a ref does call a foul because he misses that the guy actually wasn't fouled hard there is some penalty later.
True. The intent is to not disrupt play, but to review possible flops after the fact and fine a pattern of blatant 'unsportsmanlike' behavior deemed detrimental to the integrity of the league. Now if only they'd start fining refs for 'star' treatment. LOL
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top