OT: Gordon's three counted as a two

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

KingSpeed

Veteran
Joined
Sep 27, 2008
Messages
63,334
Likes
22,512
Points
113
even though he was about a foot behind the line

this is an utter disaster

did anyone else see this?
 
If there is something to be said about Gordon is that he is definitely getting a nice fat paycheck after this series. Maybe we can get Hinrich out of Chicago as they need the money to sign him.
 
even though he was about a foot behind the line

this is an utter disaster

did anyone else see this?

I thought it was interesting that they made sure the Ray Allen 3 was a three (foot behind the line) in the Chicago series, but didn't do shit about the Finley three against the Kings.
 
I thought it was interesting that they made sure the Ray Allen 3 was a three (foot behind the line) in the Chicago series, but didn't do shit about the Finley three against the Kings.

those were two different situations; in Finley's case, it was clearly a three, but it was late and they can only check to see if something's late if it's at the final buzzer of the game and in this case, there were 3 seconds left.
 
Disaster was how many bad calls they had on the Celtics, and a technical to Perk for doing absolutely nothing. The league and the refs wanted some over times, and they tried their best to get there.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top