Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And/or we need to win. We are basically trading buckets with them at this point. But the great thing is that we can control our own destiny if we want to.
Maybe there is a little but of hope that they expend so much energy getting there that they run out of gas in the playoffs. Maybe not but I wonder.They are going to be a hellish matchup for whoever has to go against them in the first round.
They are going to be a hellish matchup for whoever has to go against them in the first round.
They are going to be a hellish matchup for whoever has to go against them in the first round.
They have two all stars/superstars, and like Houston their stars are considered better than ours, but we have a much better, more balanced starting 5 and with the additions of Kaman and Blake, a better bench, too. I think a POR vs. OKC series would be very similar to POR vs. HOU last year, tightly contested, with most games coming down to the wire, but like against Houston, I think in the end, our better balance would prevail in the end.
BNM
There will be plenty of tanking from top seeds to avoid them
Why? It's not like the 7th seed would be a cakewalk.
I would love that too! That would be such a terrible first round match up for the Warriors!Thunder are now over .500 (21-20) for the first time all season after beating Miami last night. Since starting the season 3-12, they have gone 18-8, a .692 win percentage. Apply that over their next 41 games, and they would go about 28-13, which would put them at 49-33 for the year. HollingerBot's playoff odds projects them in the 9 spot with 45 wins, 1 behind Phoenix. Pretty likely OKC actually passes Phoenix for that 8 spot by season's end. Their reward for their trouble--the likely 65+ win Warriors.
I think I will be rooting for both teams to do well the remainder of the season. They deserve each other in the first round; it just feels right.
I would love that too! That would be such a terrible first round match up for the Warriors!
Sorry Mags, but I have to strongly disagree. I hope you intended that to be green font, or perhaps you were channeling your inner Kingspeed.
GSW is a horrible, horrible, HORRIBLE match up for OKC. Other than maybe the Spurs (just because they are the Spurs), the Warriors are the worst possible match up for OKC. Other than Durant, the Warriors are as good, to considerably better than the Thunder at all positions, better and more efficient offensively, better defensively, they are deeper and better coached.
The one, and only, advantage the Thunder have is Durant, and GSW is better equipped to defend him than any other team in the league. They have FOUR very good defenders they can throw at him. Harrison Barnes will start on Durant and Iggy will be Barnes primary back-up. If that's not enough, although Klay Thompson is listed as a SG, he's 6'7" and a very good perimeter defender. Finally, if GSW wants to go big and get physical with Durant, they can throw Draymond Green at him (with David Lee at the 4). Other than Durant being Durant, one problem most teams have is their primary defender gets worn down, or in foul trouble chasing Durant around for 4 quarters. Not a problem for GSW. If one guy gets gassed, or in foul trouble, they have three more guys who can spell him. They can throw fresh legs at him all night long.
Westbrook is OKCs second best player, but he would also be the second best PG in this series, and the margin is actually pretty big. Curry is a better, much more efficient scorer and a better distributor. Westbrook is an inefficient scorer who thinks he's way better than he actually is. As currently constructed, it is VERY likely GSW would sweep OKC. The only way OKC even wins one game is if Durant just totally goes off and is in a zone where it won't matter who is guarding him. But, thanks to Westbrook, that will only happen, at most, once. Westbrook will not stand idly by while the reigning MVP and 4-time scoring champ steals his Thunder. He will freeze Durant out, just like he always does in the playoffs (last year, Durant was the MVP and scoring champ, but Westbrook actually had more FGA/36 in the playoffs than Durant). So, unless there is a big trade, I see GSW taking out the Thunder in 4, or at most 5 games.
As far as the rest of the roster goes, Andrew Bogut is who Steven Adams wants to be when he grows up. Although he does share Bogut's tendency to get under his opponents' skin, he's not the player Bogut is. Bogut is just better all around, better scorer, better defender, much better rebounder and much better passer. Serge Ibaka is a great weak side shot blocker, but is actually a weak man-to-man defender. He simply cannot guard many power forwards. Aldridge absolutely kills him, which is why Scott Brooks often puts Perkins or Adams on Aldridge. Draymond Green is not a shot blocker like Ibaka, but a much better man-to-man defender. Plus, the Warriors also have David Lee who is fully capable of abusing Ibaka in the post. At SG. Klay Thompson is >>>>>>> than Dion Waiters or anyone else OKC cares to trot out at the 2-guard position. Thompson is a true 2-way player. OKC has a mix of 1-way specialists at this position, none of who are near the player Thompson is.
As mentioned GSW has a much better bench, with Speights, Lee and Iggy and Steve Kerr may be a rookie coach, but he may be the single biggest reason why GSW is so much better this year than last. Scott Brooks just kind of rolls the balls out there hoping Westbrook will play nice and share with Durant.
If OKC manages to get Brook Lopez, the series would be less lopsided, more likely to go 5, possibly 6 games, but adding a legitimate low post scoring threat would mostly just reduce GSW's MOV. Even with Lopez, the Warriors big man rotation of Bogut, Green, Speights and Lee is still better than OKC's rotation of Lopez, Ibaka, Adams and Collison.
Ultimately, GSW is just a much better, deeper, more balanced team than OKC. GSW is 2nd in the league in 3FG% with multiple deep threats (Curry, 3FG% = .399, Klay 3FG% = .446, Barnes, 3FG% = .440). And, that's another huge advantage GSW has over OKC. None of OKC's guards are good 3-point shooters. In fact, they suck. OKC is 26th in the league in 3FG%. Durant and Ibaka are OKC's only 3-point threats. You don't need, or even want, to guard anyone else on their roster out to the 3-point line. In fact, you want to back off Westbrook (.250 3FG%), Waiters (.267 3FG%) and Reggie Jackson (.288 3FG%) and dare them to jack up threes, and thankfully those three chuckers will oblige.
BNM
I agree and would add that the first round could be the difference with the match-ups. For example... I think the Blazer's best first round match-up would be Houston and their worst would be Memphis.Let's face it, there aren't going to be any cakewalks in the first round. The West is going to be brutal, 1-8.
I would agree with thisTeams in order that I would like to face in first round (not all are realistic):
HOU
DAL
LAC
Teams in order that I don't want to face in first round (not all are realistic):
MEM
SAS
OKC
I do agree that GS has shown, so far, that they are a well oiled offense and defense. But Westbrick vs Curry is more level than you think. Curry is not strong enough to defend Westbrook and I would suspect OKC would be posting Westbrick constantly.
The best player on the floor is still Durant. I don't care what anyone else thinks... He didn't get MVP last season as a fluke.
In the end, the playoff experience of OKC is their trump card. They've been to the finals, WCF on several occasions and many playoff games. GS hasn't even made it past the first round with the roster they have right now.
I'd prefer they thuck themselves.Thuck the Funder!
