Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
3. Who cares? I doubt the Bucks cared when they drafted him. I doubt the Nets care right now.
There's absolutely no way that that's true. There's a huge difference in his value if he's actually 24 or 21. Player ability, on average, increases non-linearly until the start of a player's prime around age 26/27. The further away from that prime a player is, the more he can be expected to improve. Jianlian was a far more interesting prospect at 21 than he is at 24 (or at 19, when the Bucks drafted him, rather than 22). If he's 21, he still has a fair amount of likely upside. If he's 24, the bulk of his development is finished and he just has incremental improvement left before he reaches his prime.
Upside is so overrated. Most players never ever fill their potential,
If by "potential," you mean "hype" that's probably true. People claimed Jianlian could be a Chinese KG. That was almost surely never going to happen. However, studies have shown a pretty clear development path that the vast majority of athletes take, and most players are quite a bit worse at 21 than they are at 27. They're not too different at 24 than they are at 27. So those three years matter. If Jianlian were 21 right now, one could expect a lot of gains before he reached 27. If he's 24, one can't expect it (though individual players can, of course, be exceptions).
In fact, questions about his age came long before he was drafted. The Bucks must have felt it was either worth the risk to draft him despite the age concerns, or they didn't care that much about them. The same goes for the Nets when they traded for him.
They took the risk, because there was no evidence, at that time, for the claims that he was older than advertised.
If it had been known he were 22 at the time, I'm certain he would have been a much, much lower draft pick. Quite likely not even a first rounder.
And this is evidence how? Like I said, this came from a blog, and could be easily photo-shopped.
If true, he should be banned from further international competition for a period of time similar to a doping offense.
I'd be pissed if I were a Nets fan.
I think that would be a fair punishment.
If this is legitimate proof that he lied about his age I think there are definitely people who would care. Essentially he lied to gain an advantage which is the same as doping or cheating in a game IMO. People don't like being deceived.
"I'm not concerned," said Nets GM Kiki Vandeweghe. "Any time you have someone who is not from this country, those issues arise. What I look at is he's a young developing player. He hasn't played a ton of basketball to this point. You can look at his body and his physical makeup and see he's obviously very talented but still maturing. Whether he's 21 or 22, he's still very young."
And like the Nets fan above stated, what's really going to change with time for Yi?
They took the risk, because there was no evidence, at that time, for the claims that he was older than advertised.
If it had been known he were 22 at the time, I'm certain he would have been a much, much lower draft pick. Quite likely not even a first rounder.
Why would we be pissed? Is his shooting range going to go down now that he is 24?
Do you honestly think he has as bright of a future as a 24 year-old, rather than as a 21 year-old? Since most players improve both in skill level and physical capabilities rather markedly over this three year span, I know that if I were a Nets fan I would be disappointed and less optimistic about his ability to become an impact player.
Ed O.
I think that would be a fair punishment.
If this is legitimate proof that he lied about his age I think there are definitely people who would care. Essentially he lied to gain an advantage which is the same as doping or cheating in a game IMO. People don't like being deceived.
Do you honestly think he has as bright of a future as a 24 year-old, rather than as a 21 year-old? Since most players improve both in skill level and physical capabilities rather markedly over this three year span, I know that if I were a Nets fan I would be disappointed and less optimistic about his ability to become an impact player.
Ed O.
sure it's possible, but he'd be breaking the trend of 99% of all players. Hoping that your particular player is going to be the exception to the general rule of player development is just setting yourself up for a letdown. For every Steve Nash there's a million Steve Blakes.But his NBA experince is still at two years no matter how old he is. He's progressed so much just from last year but is he suddenly going to stop once he reaches a certian age? He could find his role as an impact player when he's 30 years old or even next year depending on how he develops, not his age.
sure it's possible, but he'd be breaking the trend of 99% of all players. Hoping that your particular player is going to be the exception to the general rule of player development is just setting yourself up for a letdown. For every Steve Nash there's a million Steve Blakes.
sure it's possible, but he'd be breaking the trend of 99% of all players. Hoping that your particular player is going to be the exception to the general rule of player development is just setting yourself up for a letdown. For every Steve Nash there's a million Steve Blakes.
Some of us wouldn't mind a Steve Blake. Not every player is going to be a superstar so you sometimes need those gel players and that's what I see Yi is because of his size and shooting range.
Sorry, I should've clarified. No, there's nothing wrong with a Steve Blake, every team needs a few. But with the 6th pick, Milwaukee must have been expecting to get more than a role player.
So when the Nets traded for him, what were your (and Nets fans in general) expectations? I guess after a disappointing rookie season you all sort of figured he was drafted too high?Yeah but I was stating about Nets fans being pissed about Yi's age. I'm not high on Yi but he can still help us win if he uses what he has right.
The main reason we got Yi is money IMO. Just go look at the Nets website and you can get it in three languages now and 20 something games in has more hits than all of last year.
I really don't see the fanbase turning against Yi because he lied about his age because the truth is nobody knows what the goverment of China has to do with him as the Bucks said they called and complained about his playing time and everything.
But his NBA experince is still at two years no matter how old he is.
So when the Nets traded for him, what were your (and Nets fans in general) expectations? I guess after a disappointing rookie season you all sort of figured he was drafted too high?
Anyway, as a NBA fan in general, I would still be upset with Yi if he really did lie about his age. Already him wanting to pick his team is bad enough, but even worse he doesn't have anywhere near enough game to back it up.
That's only partially relevant. If a player comes into the league at age 40, do you expect as much improvement over his next 5 years as a 20 year old rookie? There's obviously some amount of development that comes from learning the league, but aging curves show that by far the biggest factor in development is age. And the improvement is non-linear (every year is not equal, the speed at which you develop slows the closer you get to your peak).
Those three years, if Yi is really older than he claimed, completely change his ceiling. He's currently not a very good player...as a 21 year old, he still has time to develop into a good player. At 24, with the bulk of his athletic development behind him, there's very little chance he'll become a good player.
There is a difference between 40 and 24.
Yi is already very athletic so I really didn't see him improving that. His problem is his basketball IQ and that can be learned at any age if they are willing to learn.
