Paul Pierce says he's the best player in the world

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ghoti @ Jul 31 2008, 02:08 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GrandKenyon6 @ Jul 31 2008, 02:20 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>KG is undoubtedly the over-rated complementary piece.</div>

Based on what? The Celtics undoubtedly sucked <span style="font-size:36pt;line-height:100%">until they learned to play defense.</span>
</div>




Kevin Garnett.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ghoti @ Jul 31 2008, 03:08 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GrandKenyon6 @ Jul 31 2008, 02:20 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>KG is undoubtedly the over-rated complementary piece.</div>

Based on what? The Celtics undoubtedly sucked until they learned to play defense.
</div>

Posey came to the Celtics at the same time KG did. Who's to say he didn't help their defense as well? Why is it just KG's defense that is being noticed?
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan @ Jul 30 2008, 11:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Thrilla @ Jul 31 2008, 12:27 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I really don't feel like explaining to you how incredibly horrible the roster that Ainge inherited was. Please go look at it. He very successfully turned a roster full of overpaid useless veterans into a roster full of young players with upside and inflated trade value. He was in talks for every major star that hit the trade market, but was patient enough to wait for the right ones.</div>

I really don't feel like going through all of his draft mistakes and horrible roster moves. He got lucky with Al Jefferson, otherwise, the roster had minimal value.


</div>
Draft mistakes?

Solid picks: Al Jefferson, Rajon Rondo, Delonte West, Kendrick Perkins, Ryan Gomes, Leon Powe

Decent picks: Tony Allen, Glen Davis, Justin Reed

Busts: Marcus Banks, Gerald Green

All of these picks were made with late first round and second round picks. His draft record is better than any other GM that hasn't had a lottery pick. Sure the Telfair trade was dumb on draft day, but in return he traded a 3 yr commitment to LaFrentz for 2 yrs of Ratliff, which was key in landing Garnett. But in your logic, when you hate a guy, a good pick is "luck" and 2 bad picks out of 11 is a ton of draft mistakes. He has done dumb stuff, sure, but he's been an above average GM.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Being in talks for every major star is GM-speak for desperately trying to make a deal. Zeke too was in talks for every major star that hit the trade market and plenty more that weren't on the market.</div>
Wrong again. Ainge had the package to get the Iversons of the world when they were available. Zeke did not. Zeke was exactly as you describe, Ainge was not. The Celtics could have gotten any of the major stars that have been traded in the past 3 years for the Jefferson package. But Ainge wasn't willing to part with those players unless what he got was well worth it. He showed a lot of patience waiting for the right deal, all the while having to listen to people (like you) bash him for no other reason than they don't particularly like him.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (pegs @ Jul 31 2008, 08:23 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ghoti @ Jul 31 2008, 03:08 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GrandKenyon6 @ Jul 31 2008, 02:20 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>KG is undoubtedly the over-rated complementary piece.</div>

Based on what? The Celtics undoubtedly sucked until they learned to play defense.
</div>

Posey came to the Celtics at the same time KG did. Who's to say he didn't help their defense as well? Why is it just KG's defense that is being noticed?
</div>

Posey's help on defense was significant. KG is the superstar, so the camera and commentators are always on him. KG deserves credit, but not all of it. How many times did we see Bill Russell and KG loving on each other during the season?
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Thrilla @ Jul 31 2008, 10:47 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan @ Jul 30 2008, 11:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Thrilla @ Jul 31 2008, 12:27 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I really don't feel like explaining to you how incredibly horrible the roster that Ainge inherited was. Please go look at it. He very successfully turned a roster full of overpaid useless veterans into a roster full of young players with upside and inflated trade value. He was in talks for every major star that hit the trade market, but was patient enough to wait for the right ones.</div>

I really don't feel like going through all of his draft mistakes and horrible roster moves. He got lucky with Al Jefferson, otherwise, the roster had minimal value.


</div>
Draft mistakes?

Solid picks: Al Jefferson, Rajon Rondo, Delonte West, Kendrick Perkins, Ryan Gomes, Leon Powe

Decent picks: Tony Allen, Glen Davis, Justin Reed

Busts: Marcus Banks, Gerald Green

All of these picks were made with late first round and second round picks. His draft record is better than any other GM that hasn't had a lottery pick. Sure the Telfair trade was dumb on draft day, but in return he traded a 3 yr commitment to LaFrentz for 2 yrs of Ratliff, which was key in landing Garnett. But in your logic, when you hate a guy, a good pick is "luck" and 2 bad picks out of 11 is a ton of draft mistakes. He has done dumb stuff, sure, but he's been an above average GM.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Being in talks for every major star is GM-speak for desperately trying to make a deal. Zeke too was in talks for every major star that hit the trade market and plenty more that weren't on the market.</div>
Wrong again. Ainge had the package to get the Iversons of the world when they were available. Zeke did not. Zeke was exactly as you describe, Ainge was not. The Celtics could have gotten any of the major stars that have been traded in the past 3 years for the Jefferson package. But Ainge wasn't willing to part with those players unless what he got was well worth it. He showed a lot of patience waiting for the right deal, all the while having to listen to people (like you) bash him for no other reason than they don't particularly like him.
</div>

Like I said, I don't have the time to go through all of his many, many mistakes, so I'll list a few.

Ainge traded for LaFrentz in the first place
Ainge turned down a trade from Houston during the 2005 Draft for their 2005 and 2006 First round picks to take Gerald Green
Ainge had made a promise to draft Monta Ellis and backed out of it
Ainge made the moronic trade for Wally

Al Jefferson was the only player on the roster that was valuable in a major trade and no, the Celtics could not have gotten any of the major stars with that package. McHale had turned down better packages in the past.

It is hilarious for you to say that I don't like Ainge, because that is completely false. He was one of my favorite players after the Tree Rollins incident. I have no bias against him. He is simply an incompetent GM that got lucky after his first few directions didn't work.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Thrilla @ Jul 31 2008, 09:47 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan @ Jul 30 2008, 11:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Thrilla @ Jul 31 2008, 12:27 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I really don't feel like explaining to you how incredibly horrible the roster that Ainge inherited was. Please go look at it. He very successfully turned a roster full of overpaid useless veterans into a roster full of young players with upside and inflated trade value. He was in talks for every major star that hit the trade market, but was patient enough to wait for the right ones.</div>

I really don't feel like going through all of his draft mistakes and horrible roster moves. He got lucky with Al Jefferson, otherwise, the roster had minimal value.


</div>
Draft mistakes?

Solid picks: Al Jefferson, Rajon Rondo, Delonte West, Kendrick Perkins, Ryan Gomes, Leon Powe

Decent picks: Tony Allen, Glen Davis, Justin Reed

Busts: Marcus Banks, Gerald Green

All of these picks were made with late first round and second round picks. His draft record is better than any other GM that hasn't had a lottery pick. Sure the Telfair trade was dumb on draft day, but in return he traded a 3 yr commitment to LaFrentz for 2 yrs of Ratliff, which was key in landing Garnett. But in your logic, when you hate a guy, a good pick is "luck" and 2 bad picks out of 11 is a ton of draft mistakes. He has done dumb stuff, sure, but he's been an above average GM.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Being in talks for every major star is GM-speak for desperately trying to make a deal. Zeke too was in talks for every major star that hit the trade market and plenty more that weren't on the market.</div>
Wrong again. Ainge had the package to get the Iversons of the world when they were available. Zeke did not. Zeke was exactly as you describe, Ainge was not. The Celtics could have gotten any of the major stars that have been traded in the past 3 years for the Jefferson package. But Ainge wasn't willing to part with those players unless what he got was well worth it. He showed a lot of patience waiting for the right deal, all the while having to listen to people (like you) bash him for no other reason than they don't particularly like him.
</div>

I would say its a little early to call Green a bust. He is 22. Had he gone to college for 4 years, this would be his first year in the league. Im not saying hes great or even that I like him but he does have a lot of talent and he will definitely get better.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan @ Jul 31 2008, 11:35 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Thrilla @ Jul 31 2008, 10:47 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan @ Jul 30 2008, 11:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Thrilla @ Jul 31 2008, 12:27 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I really don't feel like explaining to you how incredibly horrible the roster that Ainge inherited was. Please go look at it. He very successfully turned a roster full of overpaid useless veterans into a roster full of young players with upside and inflated trade value. He was in talks for every major star that hit the trade market, but was patient enough to wait for the right ones.</div>

I really don't feel like going through all of his draft mistakes and horrible roster moves. He got lucky with Al Jefferson, otherwise, the roster had minimal value.


</div>
Draft mistakes?

Solid picks: Al Jefferson, Rajon Rondo, Delonte West, Kendrick Perkins, Ryan Gomes, Leon Powe

Decent picks: Tony Allen, Glen Davis, Justin Reed

Busts: Marcus Banks, Gerald Green

All of these picks were made with late first round and second round picks. His draft record is better than any other GM that hasn't had a lottery pick. Sure the Telfair trade was dumb on draft day, but in return he traded a 3 yr commitment to LaFrentz for 2 yrs of Ratliff, which was key in landing Garnett. But in your logic, when you hate a guy, a good pick is "luck" and 2 bad picks out of 11 is a ton of draft mistakes. He has done dumb stuff, sure, but he's been an above average GM.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Being in talks for every major star is GM-speak for desperately trying to make a deal. Zeke too was in talks for every major star that hit the trade market and plenty more that weren't on the market.</div>
Wrong again. Ainge had the package to get the Iversons of the world when they were available. Zeke did not. Zeke was exactly as you describe, Ainge was not. The Celtics could have gotten any of the major stars that have been traded in the past 3 years for the Jefferson package. But Ainge wasn't willing to part with those players unless what he got was well worth it. He showed a lot of patience waiting for the right deal, all the while having to listen to people (like you) bash him for no other reason than they don't particularly like him.
</div>

Like I said, I don't have the time to go through all of his many, many mistakes, so I'll list a few.

Ainge traded for LaFrentz in the first place</div> This says more about Antoine's trade value. That trade was fine in my book because Walker was a black hole and LaFrentz fit nicely into the offense when he was healthy. He also got a first round draft pick in the deal.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Ainge turned down a trade from Houston during the 2005 Draft for their 2005 and 2006 First round picks to take Gerald Green</div>This is not true. It is mere speculation. Ainge gets rock hard for first round draft picks and wouldn't have turned it down. Gerald Green was not somebody on his radar, but he was almost forced to pick him that late in the draft.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Ainge had made a promise to draft Monta Ellis and backed out of it</div>This may be true, but Green was supposed to go top 5 and slid all the way down to 18. In hindsight, this looks bad, but every team on the board passed on Ellis, as well. To me, you have to credit Ainge for recognizing the talent in Ellis and making a promise to draft him at 18, when other GMs viewed him as a mid 2nd rounder. Ainge selecting Green was an impulse pick where Danny wasn't really relying on his own judgment.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Ainge made the moronic trade for Wally</div>Moronic? He traded away Blount's horrible contract, a 12th man, and Ricky Davis for Wally, a 12th man, an expiring contract and a 1st round pick. What is moronic about that? Mark Blount is garbage, and Ainge should have never signed him in the first place. Getting rid of him was worth more than anything in the deal. And Ricky for Wally was a wash. Had Wally never got injured, he would have been a better fit on the team, especially considering how much of a negative effect Davis had in the locker room and with the younger players. The key here is the first round pick, which puts a W in Ainge's column for the trade. The pick was later used in the Garnett deal and Wally was later used in the Allen deal.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Al Jefferson was the only player on the roster that was valuable in a major trade and no, the Celtics could not have gotten any of the major stars with that package. McHale had turned down better packages in the past.</div>Al Jefferson was the only player good enough to be the centerpiece in a deal, not the only one of value. Take a look at what it took for teams to land some of the bigger stars that have gone on the market. Al Jefferson is, or at least will be, the best player a team recieved in return for an aging star. The league was also very high on Gerald Green at the time thanks to the way the Celtics were handling him. Also, what better offers did McHale receive? I don't remember any. Maybe you read something on ESPN and confused it for fact. Seems like you do that a lot.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>It is hilarious for you to say that I don't like Ainge, because that is completely false. He was one of my favorite players after the Tree Rollins incident. I have no bias against him. He is simply an incompetent GM that got lucky after his first few directions didn't work.</div>You have me fooled, then. Because it certainly seems to me that you have something against him. Either that, or you have a tendency to downplay positives and exaggerate negatives, which I think is also the case. Ainge had to walk a fine line in Boston with fans and owners who wanted to see a team on the court competing. They don't stand for rebuilding teams in Boston these days, and at times, this had Ainge making some moves that went against what always was his plan. Ainge said from the beginning that his plan was to revamp the roster through the draft, and he did. He had to rebuild but remain competitive at the same time, which is very difficult to do, but he pulled it off. There were moves along the way that were pretty confusing, but there has been speculation that the ownership was forcing him to keep enough veterans on the team to remain a playoff contender.

There are only 2 ways to become a championship team these days. You have to get lucky and land a superstar like LeBron or Kobe in the draft, or you have to be in postion to pounce on the older superstars when they hit the market. Like it or not, Ainge put together some packages with players he acquired to land Ray Allen and KG in the same year, all the while retaining Paul Pierce. If Danny was so incompetent, he wouldn't have been in the position to pull that off. You're expectations of a GM are unrealistic if you deny him any credit for what he has done.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Thrilla @ Jul 31 2008, 01:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>This says more about Antoine's trade value. That trade was fine in my book because Walker was a black hole and LaFrentz fit nicely into the offense when he was healthy. He also got a first round draft pick in the deal.</div>

It was a horrible trade because of LaFrentz's contract. Sure he should have gotten rid of Shimmy Boy, but that was a horrible contract to take back and it made the team worse. It also required Ainge to give away talent later on to fix this mistake. A constant theme for his GM-ship.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>This is not true. It is mere speculation. Ainge gets rock hard for first round draft picks and wouldn't have turned it down. Gerald Green was not somebody on his radar, but he was almost forced to pick him that late in the draft.</div>

It is hilarious that you are using speculation to declare it as speculation

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>This may be true, but Green was supposed to go top 5 and slid all the way down to 18. In hindsight, this looks bad, but every team on the board passed on Ellis, as well. To me, you have to credit Ainge for recognizing the talent in Ellis and making a promise to draft him at 18, when other GMs viewed him as a mid 2nd rounder. Ainge selecting Green was an impulse pick where Danny wasn't really relying on his own judgment.</div>

When push came to shove, Ainge made a huge mistake

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Moronic? He traded away Blount's horrible contract, a 12th man, and Ricky Davis for Wally, a 12th man, an expiring contract and a 1st round pick. What is moronic about that? Mark Blount is garbage, and Ainge should have never signed him in the first place. Getting rid of him was worth more than anything in the deal. And Ricky for Wally was a wash. Had Wally never got injured, he would have been a better fit on the team, especially considering how much of a negative effect Davis had in the locker room and with the younger players. The key here is the first round pick, which puts a W in Ainge's column for the trade. The pick was later used in the Garnett deal and Wally was later used in the Allen deal.</div>

No, the key is the contract he gave Blount. Once again, a horrible decision by him has to be corrected down the road with another mistake filled trade

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Al Jefferson was the only player good enough to be the centerpiece in a deal, not the only one of value. Take a look at what it took for teams to land some of the bigger stars that have gone on the market. Al Jefferson is, or at least will be, the best player a team recieved in return for an aging star.</div>

Nice way of saying either the Celtics overpaid or they had such crap on their roster that they had to give up Al Jefferson.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>The league was also very high on Gerald Green at the time thanks to the way the Celtics were handling him.</div>

No, no they weren't. Most had written him off.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Also, what better offers did McHale receive? I don't remember any.</div>

Not my problem that you don't remember them.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Maybe you read something on ESPN and confused it for fact. Seems like you do that a lot.</div>

You really need to quit being so clueless and tossing out baseless accusations.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (gobillsdeep @ Jul 31 2008, 01:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I would say its a little early to call Green a bust. He is 22. Had he gone to college for 4 years, this would be his first year in the league. Im not saying hes great or even that I like him but he does have a lot of talent and he will definitely get better.</div>

Green fully earned his bust tag. It appears to be the only thing he worked hard at during his career.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (pegs @ Jul 31 2008, 09:23 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ghoti @ Jul 31 2008, 03:08 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GrandKenyon6 @ Jul 31 2008, 02:20 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>KG is undoubtedly the over-rated complementary piece.</div>

Based on what? The Celtics undoubtedly sucked until they learned to play defense.
</div>

Posey came to the Celtics at the same time KG did. Who's to say he didn't help their defense as well? Why is it just KG's defense that is being noticed?
</div>

Because KG is the one the defense was designed around, and his constant, intense commitment to it dragged everyone else along.

Have you ever seen a team more committed to team defense than the Celtics were last year? That's not because of Paul Pierce or Ray Allen or even James Posey. It was because of KG.

Thibodeau can design the greatest defensive schemes in NBA history, but they won't work without the talent and the buy in. KG got him both.
 
Garnett's will and determination and his hard work every single game is why he won the MVP award. He is what brought that team together and made them the winner they became. Pierce is a great player, but he will never be the leader Garnett is and he, in my opinion, is not the team's best player nevermind the globe's.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (hoopskidd5 @ Jul 31 2008, 02:49 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Garnett's will and determination and his hard work every single game is why he won the MVP award.</div>

Let's not get carried away!!
 
The MVP award goes to the best player on one of the top teams in the league. Just look at this year's candidates- Kobe (first in the West), Paul (lead NO to 2nd seed in tough Western Conference), KG (best record in the league), and LeBron (an exception to the rule, but look at the man's numbers). Without Garnett playing the way he does every night that team would not have been as successfully as it was. He made that team so much better by his unselfishness and his refusal to take a night off. When Boston acquired him and Ray Allen last year the question everyone was asking was can they coexist and put their egos aside? I think Garnett was an enormous part of their ability to play together and the reason he is such a great leader is because he leads by example and plays every single game with so much heart and determination. His numbers were not as impressive as some of the other candidates and they paled in comparison to statlines he has put up previously in his career, but he won the award because of what he did to change the culture of that team. Most VALUABLE player, there was no doubt it was him. There was plenty of reason to doubt Boston before the season started. Look at the Lakers when they added Malone and Payton, they were supposed to blow away everyone on paper, but without the chemistry you have nothing. Garnett made sure they would have no problems playing together and for that he should get so much credit and that is why he won the award..He didnt win it because of his numbers, if it were about numbers he wouldnt have been in the conversation.
 
Hmm good point haha I completely forgot that Kobe got it hahaha...Woww
 
Well I think everything I said was pretty on point minus the whole him not winning it thing haha..I uhhh was talking about 2k8 obviouslyyy..hmm..yeaah
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan @ Jul 31 2008, 01:36 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>It was a horrible trade because of LaFrentz's contract. Sure he should have gotten rid of Shimmy Boy, but that was a horrible contract to take back and it made the team worse. It also required Ainge to give away talent later on to fix this mistake. A constant theme for his GM-ship.</div>

First off, Walker's dance is called the wiggle, not the shimmy. Get it right. Secondly, it didn't require any talent to get rid of Raef, his contract was traded for Ratliff's contract when the Telfair deal went down.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>It is hilarious that you are using speculation to declare it as speculation</div>What? If you're asking if I am speculating that Danny Ainge's penis gets erect for 1st round picks, you're right. I have never felt or seen it while he was in the middle of acquiring a draft pick. Other than that, there is no speculation on my part, just yours.<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>When push came to shove, Ainge made a huge mistake</div>So did every other GM in basketball, then, for passing on Ellis. But only criticize Ainge for it. Makes sense.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>No, the key is the contract he gave Blount. Once again, a horrible decision by him has to be corrected down the road with another mistake filled trade</div>

Yes, in hindsight, it was a bad signing. But Blount had a great contract year and it looked like a good deal at the time. Even without Blount in that trade, it's still a W for Ainge. The first rounder decided it.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Nice way of saying either the Celtics overpaid or they had such crap on their roster that they had to give up Al Jefferson.</div>

Don't be ridiculous. We're talking about KG here. They had to give up Jefferson, just like any other team would have had to give up their best young player. McHale is stupid, but not that stupid.<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>No, no they weren't. Most had written him off.</div>

Seriously, where do you come up with this stuff? You talk like you're some kind of NBA insider. You do it so casually, too. How do you know that? Any Boston trade rumors that came out back then had the other team demanding Green.<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Not my problem that you don't remember them.</div>

Haha, funny. I remember the rumors, but none of the packages I heard about were better than the Boston one. Even AFTER KG refused to go to Boston, McHale still couldn't come up with anything better. Like I said, you read articles on websites or in the paper and you believe them all. Don't be naive, not everything you read is fact.<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>You really need to quit being so clueless and tossing out baseless accusations.</div>

I'm sorry, but it's true. You present rumors and speculation as fact, and you do it a lot. I'm not saying you're making things up, you just say things that were once rumors and talk about them like they are 100% legit and factual.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan @ Jul 31 2008, 01:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (gobillsdeep @ Jul 31 2008, 01:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I would say its a little early to call Green a bust. He is 22. Had he gone to college for 4 years, this would be his first year in the league. Im not saying hes great or even that I like him but he does have a lot of talent and he will definitely get better.</div>

Green fully earned his bust tag. It appears to be the only thing he worked hard at during his career.
</div>

What appears to be the only thing he worked hard at?
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Thrilla @ Jul 31 2008, 03:27 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>First off, Walker's dance is called the wiggle, not the shimmy. Get it right. Secondly, it didn't require any talent to get rid of Raef, his contract was traded for Ratliff's contract when the Telfair deal went down.</div>

Wrong. Telfair had worn out his welcome in Portland. They were dumping him. Without the first round pick, Raef doesn't get traded for Theo. That deal was all about Boston missing out on Gay. I'd say Roy, but Ainge isn't smart enough to pull off the swap that KP did by screwing up the planned trade between Houston and Minnesota.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>What? If you're asking if I am speculating that Danny Ainge's penis gets erect for 1st round picks, you're right. I have never felt or seen it while he was in the middle of acquiring a draft pick. Other than that, there is no speculation on my part, just yours.</div>

Yes there is. You have no proof that there wasn't an offer from Houston. I'll trust what I was told.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>So did every other GM in basketball, then, for passing on Ellis. But only criticize Ainge for it. Makes sense.</div>

Try to stick to the topic. We aren't talking about other GM's here. Ainge screwed up and you can't sugar coat it.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Yes, in hindsight, it was a bad signing. But Blount had a great contract year and it looked like a good deal at the time. Even without Blount in that trade, it's still a W for Ainge. The first rounder decided it.</div>

It was a bad signing from the moment it happened. The trade is still a bad trade because of Wally's contract and known injury issues.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Don't be ridiculous. We're talking about KG here. They had to give up Jefferson, just like any other team would have had to give up their best young player. McHale is stupid, but not that stupid.</div>

I'll leave you in your KG is god world. I deal in reality and yes, McHale is that stupid.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Seriously, where do you come up with this stuff? You talk like you're some kind of NBA insider. You do it so casually, too. How do you know that? Any Boston trade rumors that came out back then had the other team demanding Green.</div>

I have some very good sources and I don't talk out of my ass. Published trade rumors are funny things.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Haha, funny. I remember the rumors, but none of the packages I heard about were better than the Boston one. Even AFTER KG refused to go to Boston, McHale still couldn't come up with anything better. Like I said, you read articles on websites or in the paper and you believe them all. Don't be naive, not everything you read is fact.</div>

I'll say it again, quit making such ridiculous accusations. I believe very little of what I read on websites or in the paper and I only state as fact what I know to be facts.

In seasons prior, McHale had received better offers, but he turned them down because he was convinced he could still build around him.

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>I'm sorry, but it's true. You present rumors and speculation as fact, and you do it a lot. I'm not saying you're making things up, you just say things that were once rumors and talk about them like they are 100% legit and factual.</div>

For the third time, no I don't. I only talk about facts as facts. The thing to remember is that there are multiple side to any trade proposal and many things change as a deal is getting structured. Heck, teams make offers all the time to put pressure on other teams and there is a huge rumor market that the public never hears about.

I'm not saying I know everything, but the things I know, I know and I don't toss around rumors as facts. Although some of the things I say may only appear in public as rumors, I don't talk out of my ass.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (gobillsdeep @ Jul 31 2008, 03:46 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan @ Jul 31 2008, 01:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (gobillsdeep @ Jul 31 2008, 01:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I would say its a little early to call Green a bust. He is 22. Had he gone to college for 4 years, this would be his first year in the league. Im not saying hes great or even that I like him but he does have a lot of talent and he will definitely get better.</div>

Green fully earned his bust tag. It appears to be the only thing he worked hard at during his career.
</div>

What appears to be the only thing he worked hard at?
</div>

Sucking
Being a bust
Not working hard
Not understanding the NBA game

Take your pick
 
I don't know why people were arguing earlier about who was most important to the celtics. Without KG the celtics don't win the title. Without Paul Pierce the Celtics don't win the title (made painfully evident by the silenced Boston Garden once he had to be carried off because of his knee injury). Both players contributed equally and it would be unfair to give either player more credit than the other for bringing Boston a championship.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (bling890 @ Jul 31 2008, 03:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I don't know why people were arguing earlier about who was most important to the celtics. Without KG the celtics don't win the title. Without Paul Pierce the Celtics don't win the title (made painfully evident by the silenced Boston Garden once he had to be carried off because of his knee injury). Both players contributed equally and it would be unfair to give either player more credit than the other for bringing Boston a championship.</div>

Without Rajon Rondo the Celtics don't win a title. Does he deserve equal credit, too? How about James Posey? Eddie House?

This was KG's team. Everyone else was a compliment to him.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ghoti @ Jul 31 2008, 03:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (bling890 @ Jul 31 2008, 03:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I don't know why people were arguing earlier about who was most important to the celtics. Without KG the celtics don't win the title. Without Paul Pierce the Celtics don't win the title (made painfully evident by the silenced Boston Garden once he had to be carried off because of his knee injury). Both players contributed equally and it would be unfair to give either player more credit than the other for bringing Boston a championship.</div>

Without Rajon Rondo the Celtics don't win a title. Does he deserve equal credit, too? How about James Posey? Eddie House?

This was KG's team. Everyone else was a compliment to him.
</div>

No, Paul Pierce and KG complimented each other. Paul Peirce is in no way a role player a la eddie house. and honestly do you really think the Celtics couldnt have won without Eddie House?? Cmon now. It's kind of wierd to even say this was complertely KG's team since the man waited his whole effin career to be a complimentary player (the man almsot never takes over in the final quarter). Sure he instilled a defensive mentality which helped propelled them to a championship, but then we might as well say that the Pistons were Ben Wallace's team instead of Chauncey Billups.'
 
This was KG's team, but without Paul Pierce they don't win a title. You can't say the same for one bench player like James Posey or for Rajon Rondo either.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ghoti @ Jul 31 2008, 04:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (bling890 @ Jul 31 2008, 03:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I don't know why people were arguing earlier about who was most important to the celtics. Without KG the celtics don't win the title. Without Paul Pierce the Celtics don't win the title (made painfully evident by the silenced Boston Garden once he had to be carried off because of his knee injury). Both players contributed equally and it would be unfair to give either player more credit than the other for bringing Boston a championship.</div>

Without Rajon Rondo the Celtics don't win a title. Does he deserve equal credit, too? How about James Posey? Eddie House?

This was KG's team. Everyone else was a compliment to him.
</div>

It is very easy to prove that it wasn't KG's team. They had success in the playoffs.
 
Great example you're setting with this. Calm down, it's not a big deal. Both of us are so far away we will never find middle ground. Let's just end this now because we're hijacking this thread.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan @ Jul 31 2008, 04:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ghoti @ Jul 31 2008, 04:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (bling890 @ Jul 31 2008, 03:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I don't know why people were arguing earlier about who was most important to the celtics. Without KG the celtics don't win the title. Without Paul Pierce the Celtics don't win the title (made painfully evident by the silenced Boston Garden once he had to be carried off because of his knee injury). Both players contributed equally and it would be unfair to give either player more credit than the other for bringing Boston a championship.</div>

Without Rajon Rondo the Celtics don't win a title. Does he deserve equal credit, too? How about James Posey? Eddie House?

This was KG's team. Everyone else was a compliment to him.
</div>

It is very easy to prove that it wasn't KG's team. They had success in the playoffs.
</div>

Looked like KG's team when they were away in the first 2 rounds
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cpawfan @ Jul 31 2008, 04:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ghoti @ Jul 31 2008, 04:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (bling890 @ Jul 31 2008, 03:56 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>I don't know why people were arguing earlier about who was most important to the celtics. Without KG the celtics don't win the title. Without Paul Pierce the Celtics don't win the title (made painfully evident by the silenced Boston Garden once he had to be carried off because of his knee injury). Both players contributed equally and it would be unfair to give either player more credit than the other for bringing Boston a championship.</div>

Without Rajon Rondo the Celtics don't win a title. Does he deserve equal credit, too? How about James Posey? Eddie House?

This was KG's team. Everyone else was a compliment to him.
</div>

It is very easy to prove that it wasn't KG's team. They had success in the playoffs.
</div>

Which I already explained and you ignored.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>No, Paul Pierce and KG complimented each other. Paul Peirce is in no way a role player a la eddie house. and honestly do you really think the Celtics couldnt have won without Eddie House?? Cmon now. It's kind of wierd to even say this was complertely KG's team since the man waited his whole effin career to be a complimentary player (the man almsot never takes over in the final quarter). Sure he instilled a defensive mentality which helped propelled them to a championship, but then we might as well say that the Pistons were Ben Wallace's team instead of Chauncey Billups.'</div>
hes not a role player but hes the teams second start behind KG..That IS Garnetts team..
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Thrilla @ Jul 31 2008, 04:13 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Great example you're setting with this. Calm down, it's not a big deal. Both of us are so far away we will never find middle ground. Let's just end this now because we're hijacking this thread.</div>

As if I'm not calm.

Are you sure don't want to make yet another false accusation against me?
 
Back
Top