Pelosi Air

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

I hate shit like this...such a waste...for the record my hunch is speakers of both parties took advantage of this "perk". Has anyone done digging on the history of this and who else in Congress is using it?
 
Things would get better and more efficient if we would just let the government take over control of our healthcare system.
 
For the record, if Nancy Pelosi wishes to use military transport for her and her family, she can use the back of a C-5 or C-130 on the way to where she's going. There's zero reason our military should own LearJets.
 
This is very unsettling. Obvious waste like that is awful.
 
For the record, if Nancy Pelosi wishes to use military transport for her and her family, she can use the back of a C-5 or C-130 on the way to where she's going. There's zero reason our military should own LearJets.

Oh man, I have ridden in webbed seating on a Galaxy and my back was in tears. I finally went and sat in a jeep. I was thinking of crawling into a tank, but didn't want to get in trouble.
 
Hmmm...

http://www.mudvillegazette.com/033253.html

DoD re-writes Congressional Travel Rules
By Greyhawk


No, you can not have a fee ride home. No, you can't bring the kids.

While accepting their newly-acquired role as "shuttle service" for the Speaker of the House, the Department of Defense is attempting to draw a line in the sand regarding congressional transportation with an updated directive on DoD Support for Travel of Members and Employees of Congress. Some of the language in the newly-released regulation (dated 15 January, 2010 - the first update since 1964) appears to be the direct result of lessons learned in dealing with Nancy Pelosi.

Among other changes, the directive now specifies that "outside of the Speaker Shuttle, no funds will be made available by the Department of Defense to pay the expenses of travel or subsistence for any trip made by any Senator or Representative between Andrews AFB and their home State."

For other travel, if "deemed in the national interest" the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Legislative Affairs may "authorize the travel of ONE family member" accompanying a lawmaker at no expense to the government. While an adult child can take the place of a spouse under those circumstances, "children under 18 years of age are not authorized travel" on Congressional flights.

The old version simply stated "DoD policy prohibiting accompanying travel of dependents of Department of Defense personnel on military carriers is equally applicable to travel of dependents of members and employees of the Congress" but allowed for exceptions (only if authorized by the SecDef or branch secretary) "when essential to the proper accomplishment of the mission, desirable because of diplomatic or public relations, or necessary for the health of the individuals concerned."

Partly due to modern requirements to spell out in detail what used to be considered "common sense," the new version of 4515.12 is twice as long as the old. But I suspect our highly dedicated and patriotic lawmakers, (mostly via the magic of interpretive kabuki), won't find it overly restrictive.

(File all that under "Pelosi Rules.")

Added thought: in 1964 the regulation cautioned those planning Congressional transportation to ensure any such travel was primarily in the interest of the DoD - (not the traveling Congressman) - and further defined that interest as "not merely for the purpose of engendering goodwill or obtaining possible future benefits." That sort of thing was called fraud, waste, and abuse - and was frowned upon.

By 2007, Jack Murtha could comfortably declare (to reporters, even) that the DoD had damn well better provide Nancy Pelosi a plane because she controls their budget. I guess that's what they call "progress".


*****
 
Speaking of Murtha and "controlling budgets"...I'm sure everyone's at least heard of this, right?

John Murtha Johnstown-Cambria County Airport

Inside the terminal on a recent weekday, four passengers lined up to board a flight, outnumbered by seven security staff members and supervisors, all suited up in gloves and uniforms to screen six pieces of luggage. For three hours that day, no commercial or private planes took off or landed. Three commercial flights leave the airport on weekdays, all bound for Dulles International Airport near Washington, D.C.

The key to the airport's gleaming facilities -- and, indeed, its continued existence -- is $200 million in federal funds in the past decade and the powerful patron who steered most of that money to Johnstown. Democratic U.S. Rep. John Murtha is credited with securing at least $150 million for the airport. It was among the first in the country to win funding from this year's stimulus package: $800,000 to repave a backup runway.

The facility, newly renamed the John Murtha Johnstown-Cambria County Airport, is a testament to Mr. Murtha's ability to tap streams of federal money for pricey, state-of-the-art projects that are rare among regional airports of comparable size.

Mr. Murtha, dubbed the King of Pork by critics, consistently directs more federal money to his district than any other congressman -- $192 million in the 2008 budget. His pattern of steering millions in earmarks to defense contractors who give to his campaign and hire his allies as lobbyists is being scrutinized by the FBI as part of an investigation of a lobbying firm led by one of Mr. Murtha's closest friends.

Read more: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09110/964155-84.stm#ixzz0eQFayzpX

And in the interest of fairness, the airport's webpage reply:
U.S. Rep. John Murtha does not use the airport for his private and commercial travel on a frequent basis. The congressman makes the trip to and from Washington by land.
Completely coincidental, I'm sure, that the only three daily flights go to Dulles?
Congressman John P. Murtha has only done what a good representative should do and has made a public asset a reality by supporting our U.S. Military’s worldwide mission, economic development and jobs to the region at large.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top