- Joined
- Sep 9, 2008
- Messages
- 26,096
- Likes
- 9,073
- Points
- 113
So wait, you're saying that instead of Howard in the proof, it should've been Cunningham? I'm not sure that makes your case stronger.
JP<DC<LMA
therefore JP<LMA.
Still works.
Or, in a different way, JP couldn't crack the 4th quarter rotation of Howard and Cunningham (and Webster for about a minute) at the PF/C? And he's on par with (or better than?) LMA now?
Game learned.
JP<DC<LMA
therefore JP<LMA.
Still works.
Or, in a different way, JP couldn't crack the 4th quarter rotation of Howard and Cunningham (and Webster for about a minute) at the PF/C? And he's on par with (or better than?) LMA now?
Game learned.

What am I gonna do?