PLAYSTATION network

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (chang @ Mar 25 2007, 09:22 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Funny thing. The Massacre got good reviews from the Rolling Stones, New York Times, LA Times, E! Weekly, Village Voice, and Vibe.Another funny thing. Despite the Sony brand name, Sony isn't the most highest profiting electronics maker out there.And yes, sales represent the actual product. It means the consumer is willing to spend money on something. That alone is the key to running a successful business.</div>So, if Rolling Stones, New York imes, E! Weekly, Village Voice and Vibe run the earth? Sorry, but compared to great Hip-Hop Albums The Massacre was trash. There was more singing then actual rapping and if anyone know's a thing about Hip-Hop it was me, and The Massacre was one of the worst "Rap Albums" to date.And who is buying PS3's right now? No body, I went shopping today and was at EB Games, Best Buy and Futureshop and to my amaze, they were loaded with PS3s, just sitting there collecting dust. Because in the end, no one wants to pay $500 plus on a over-priced massive hunk of plastic with garbage games and slow processing chips. Let alone a pathetic online play and some "Blu-Ray" trash that no one even buys.
 
hahaha, no one said that album was great. It simply wasn't trash like you suggested. Once again, I'm going back to sales. If your album is successful in sales and on radio airplay and people can recognize your music, then you are considered a success. Sure, Talib Kweli and Nas might be better but can they say they're more successful? You ask a random person on the street whether they know 50, they'll most likely say yes. You ask if they know Nas, more than likely, they won't know. Nas really hasn't had a huge Billboard, chart-topping hit. 50 has had like 6 at least.I am 100% sure those magazine/newspaper writers are 10,000 times more educated than you or I am. The New York Times is the #1 respected newspaper in the U.S., if not the world. The best of the best journalists write for the Times. Most writers can't even dream about writing for them.The Cell processor chip runs 10x faster than computer chips and can process multiple processes at the same time. It processes almost 90 more gigalops than the 360 can. The I'll say again that Stanford University is using the PS3s processing power to study diseases. Even one of America's top universities recognize the technological prowess of the PS3 and realize how it can be utilized in the classroom. The lineup of games will come around just like how the 360s lineup of games came around after 6 months. The 360 had about 50 games out in the first 6 months. The PS3 has about 35 games out first 4 months.If you were running a race and someone got a 1 minute head start but you finished with identical times, would you say the other guy won?
 
I didn't bother reading your post. Because I've wasted enough of my life murdering you with my comebacks.
345eux4.jpg
 
haha murdered me?You, my friend, are in self-denial.You use arguments like brainwashing and how you think it sucks with little evidence. Com'on middle schoolers have better reasoning then that.If you can honestly prove that XBOX is better with stats and citable information, then I'll believe you.
 
Hmmm, I smell brainwashed Sony pigs. If your a gamer, use an actual system thats capable of holding strong gaming engines. Such as the one used in Gears. Sony Playshiting will never, ever have a Gears caliber game because there console is trash, aswell as there sales.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Knightz @ Mar 26 2007, 10:38 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Hmmm, I smell brainwashed Sony pigs. If your a gamer, use an actual system thats capable of holding strong gaming engines. Such as the one used in Gears. Sony Playshiting will never, ever have a Gears caliber game because there console is trash, aswell as there sales.</div>Are you seriously that dumb? I own a 360, that I ended up breaking today because it sucks so much, and a PS3. The PS3 has better graphics, faster loading times, better gameplay. The 360 has like 2 top hits, Halo and Gears and that's it. How long has it been since 360 is out now? 2 Top hits?! That's damn pathetic.
 
I'm not gonna beat a dead cat here. But I won't say anything to upset you lame-ass fan boysThat is all.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (GaMeTiMe @ Apr 1 2007, 02:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Youre all gay for caring so much
biggrin.gif
</div>Uh... if that is the case, I think you just boarded the ship
mellow.gif
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Capt. Comeback @ Mar 23 2007, 07:04 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Knightz @ Mar 23 2007, 03:12 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'>Xbox 360 destroys Playstation 3. Playstation 3 is just like Dreamcast it's ahead of it's time. If PS3 were to come out in 2-3 years it would be the top console on the shelves by far. It's sad but somebody has to lose the console war and it looks like it'll be PS3.Did anyone have Dreamcast? lol</div>Someone please reiterate what this idiot said please.What the hell does Dreamcast have to do with PS3? Dreamcast wasn't supposed to win any kind of console war. Besides, how the hell is it like Dreamcast? PS3 sold a lot of consoles, and what is everyone going to do? New consoles aren't going to come out in the next 2 years, and Microsoft is too retarded to sign contracts with companies to produce games. When 360 has like 25 more games released in the next 3 years, tell me which system you'd rather have.</div>The games for the 360 are clearly better first of all. Second of all, the games that Sony has over Microsoft are soon coming out for the 360. Third of all, the online experience for th 360 is seriously so much better than the PS3's. You are getting what you pay for. PS3's online is cheap,m unorganized, etc. -- 360's is the total opposite. I have both the 360 and the PS3. The 360 kicks the PS3's ass. No questions asked.
 
^ Thank you. Every single person with a 360 AND a PS3 pick the 360. Playstation's "BIG" games are also coming out on the 360. While XBox 360 has the exclusive rights to games like Halo and Gears of War. And mentioned about PS3's processing chip can't hold a game with the magnitude of Gears.And the Sales say it all. 10 Million for 360, 1 Million for Playstation. If Sony would have lowered the price for that GIANT hunk of trash, got some games and scrapped that whole pathetic Blu-Ray idea, they could have POSSIBLY competed with the Wii.
grillkut.jpg
 
Apparently, neither of you can read or you just don't comprehend.I'm not saying XBOX doesn't have Halo and Gears and has a HEAD START in their game collection. Either way, Playstation has Final Fantasy, Metal Gear Solid, Gran Turismo still... All of which sold 10 million+ copies, more than Halo and Gears COMBINED.It's funny how you are all calling the battle when someone has a year's advantage. If you were watching the Kentucky Derby and the horse with the worst odds gets to start at the home stretch, do you declare that horse the winner when all the other horses start from the gate? The PS3 has been out for a whole 4 months and 2 weeks. The 360 has been out for 16 months and 2 weeks. A whole years advantage... of course numbers right now will point toward the 360. Just a little logic would help...Worldwide: 2.45 million+ (see below)United States 1,058,300+[5](as of February 28, 2007)Japan 794,492[6](as of March 25, 2007)Europe 600,000+[7](as of March 27, 2007)Australia 25,000+(as of March 26, 2007)the numbers is brackets are citations on wikipedia.
 
[quote name='Street' post='88634' date='Apr 2 2007, 12:04 PM']The games for the 360 are clearly better first of all.[/quote]Ummm, Gears of War wasn't a release title. We've already established that 360 has been out over a year already, when PS3 just came out.
Second of all, the games that Sony has over Microsoft are soon coming out for the 360
Click to expand...
Name 3 top games for PS3/PS2 that Microsoft bought out from those game companies.
Third of all, the online experience for th 360 is seriously so much better than the PS3's. You are getting what you pay for. PS3's online is cheap,m unorganized, etc. -- 360's is the total opposite.
Click to expand...
$50 bucks to nil... Get to play online either way, so hmmm which to choose.
I have both the 360 and the PS3. The 360 kicks the PS3's ass. No questions asked.
Click to expand...
The 360 does not kick PS3's ass, not even PS2's ass. I don't see to eye level with you on what 360 has that's better than PS3.
 
There's a few games I can name that 360 "bought out" (more like shared, simultaneous release, platform games). Assassin's Creed, Devil May Cry 4, Guitar Hero (able to get rights after franchise has been out for years) and Grand Theft Auto IV (see Guitar Hero).PS3 still holds exclusivity to Gran Turismo, Final Fantasy, Metal Gear Solid, SOCOM, Kingdom Hearts, Jak & Daxter, Resistance, Killzone, Tekken, Virtua Fighter, Soul Calibur, The Getaway, Ratchet & Clank, Heavenly Sword, Hot Shots Golf, Afrika, Lair, Time Crisis.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>PS3 still holds exclusivity to Gran Turismo, Final Fantasy, Metal Gear Solid, SOCOM, Kingdom Hearts, Jak & Daxter, Resistance, Killzone, Tekken, Virtua Fighter, Soul Calibur, The Getaway, Ratchet & Clank, Heavenly Sword, Hot Shots Golf, Afrika, Lair, Time Crisis.</div>What and who the fuck would buy/play Tekken, Kindom Hearts, Resistance, SouL Caliber, Heavenly Sword, Hot Shots Gold, Afrika, Liar and Time Crisis?LMAO! People actually play those pieces of trash on that garbage console?If you ask the so called experts and "neutral" gamers the Xbox 360 is the best console out. So you pathetic little sony fanboys can KEEP TRYING 360 owners, Wii Owners and Neutral owners ALL pick the 360 over the PS3. And that tells you something.
 
Well, considering Kingdom Hearts outsold Gears of War... And you keep going back to Gears of War and how it proves the 360 is superior. IT WAS RELEASED A YEAR AFTER THE 360 CAME OUT!!! HOW HARD IS THAT TO UNDERSTAND?!?!Just because you don't like something means that other people won't and it's crap. What an absolute idiotic, egotistical thought.Also, no one reviewed the consoles and gave it a score besides CNET and 3rd world fan-based websites. And CNET gave PS3 the highest rating on the 360, Wii, and PS3.
 
I don't see how anyone can say that a stupid damn website and these retarded fucking "experts" can speak for every single person in the world. I don't give a shit if people like the 360 more because of Gears and Halo, it doesn't matter. The only reason 360 has numbers up there is because it was released a year earlier, meaning more time to sell and produce games, and because it is cheaper. As things get more expensive nowadays, job wages are on the rise, meaning more and more will be able to afford the PS3. We'll see what happens when PS3 has been out for a year. Until then, quit the shit about 360 crapping on everything. Just a quick question... Do you actually think that people that just own the Wii give a shit about this topic?
 
PS3 is obviously the best, but it's also the worst because you spend so much money on it when you could buy a Wii or something.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)

Featured content

Back
Top