Porn watchers think more highly of women

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

I don't see why they wouldn't. Any logical guy that wants to do some of the things with women you see in porn know they have to be nice guys
 
I'm waiting for Mags to somehow connect this to Trump.

something something rising polls, something something liberal media, something something Hilary Clinton, something something LOL! something something his wife looks like a porn star so it proves he loves women Trumo2016!
 
I don't see why they wouldn't. Any logical guy that wants to do some of the things with women you see in porn know they have to be nice guys

Translation: Nice guys can't fuck girls in real life, so they watch porn.

:MARIS61:
 
Translation: Nice guys can't fuck girls in real life, so they watch porn.

:MARIS61:
Lol no. But for marrid guys, if you see some crazy shit going down in porn, you'll have to do the dishes for a couple weeks to get her in a good mood to get her on board with what'shappening in the porn
 
Lol no. But for marrid guys, if you see some crazy shit going down in porn, you'll have to do the dishes for a couple weeks to get her in a good mood to get her on board with what'shappening in the porn

Its always been said that frequent masturbating reduces one's testosterone.


(as does getting married)
 
something something rising polls, something something liberal media, something something Hilary Clinton, something something LOL! something something his wife looks like a porn star so it proves he loves women Trumo2016!

Ha ha, he said rising poles
 
TK: It's important to keep in mind that evidence of correlation should not imply causation. My colleagues and I think our findings are best explained by third-variable factors. There are certain groups of people (e.g., religious, social, and political conservatives) that avoid pornography use who also tend to hold more gender non-egalitarian attitudes. If we assume that there is no relationship between pornography use and gender egalitarianism, then including these people will lead to a positive bias in the results (i.e. more supportive gender-egalitarian attitudes among pornography users). Our findings may simply reflect the presence of people who avoid pornography use and hold more gender non-egalitarian attitudes in our sample.

Interesting. But inconclusive. As the above paragraph shows. there are those who avoid porn who have very negative views on women and that could skew results. Also, at least in the interview, they don't actually define what constitutes porn. Michelangelo's David? Playboy? Sports Illustrated swimsuit issue? ESPN the Body issue? Depictions of rape and torture? Demonstrations of how to put on a condom? Breast feeding? Educational materials on menstruation? All of these have been called pornographic at various times, and obviously there is a wide difference. I'd like to see the original article and see how they define porn.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top