Potential draft picks 2-8. Players Dame doesn’t want. (2 Viewers)

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Dame wants vet needle movers. Gobert is that defensively
Come the playoffs when teams have time to prepare for the opponent, Gobert is a proven defensive liability. Just involve him in a high pick and roll and have him switched off onto your preferred guard/wing for a wide open look every time. He's been on quite a few teams that tore it up in the regular season but his career playoff record is 21-33 largely for this reason.

STOMP
 
Come the playoffs when teams have time to prepare for the opponent, Gobert is a proven defensive liability. Just involve him in a high pick and roll and have him switched off onto your preferred guard/wing for a wide open look every time. He's been on quite a few teams that tore it up in the regular season but his career playoff record is 21-33 largely for this reason.

STOMP
Don't want either Goober, or Whiney KAT on the Blazers.
 
The middling approach was just about as ideal a result as we could’ve hoped. We got Grant for very cheap and draft Sharpe would is our a huge piece of our future. The mistake was signing GPII to a MLE—it’s now over with and we got 2nds back, let’s just learn from this and bring in someone better with our money.
Signing GPII obviously wasn't a mistake as they got him for just money and then turned him into draft capitol. This past offseason I advocated for not resigning Nurk and instead going after 26 year old Kavon Looney who signed for less then half of what what Nurk did. If Portland had used the future Bucks #1 (which they used to acquire Grant) to instead deal for the #12 (like Detroit did) and draft Jalen Duren, they'd be in a much more ideal place now and into the future.... hell, they might even have been able to take a run at Grant as a FA this summer.

STOMP
 
Come the playoffs when teams have time to prepare for the opponent, Gobert is a proven defensive liability. Just involve him in a high pick and roll and have him switched off onto your preferred guard/wing for a wide open look every time. He's been on quite a few teams that tore it up in the regular season but his career playoff record is 21-33 largely for this reason.

STOMP
To be clear, I don’t want Gobert. I just think in panic and desperation mode he’ll be out there for us
 
To be clear, I don’t want Gobert. I just think in panic and desperation mode he’ll be out there for us
Like seemingly everyone, I was in disbelief when the TWolves gave up the farm for him. While I do like having him on my fantasy team just fine, in real life ages 29-33 at 40M a year, I'm for going another direction.

STOMP
 
Signing GPII obviously wasn't a mistake as they got him for just money and then turned him into draft capitol. This past offseason I advocated for not resigning Nurk and instead going after 26 year old Kavon Looney who signed for less then half of what what Nurk did. If Portland had used the future Bucks #1 (which they used to acquire Grant) to instead deal for the #12 (like Detroit did) and draft Jalen Duren, they'd be in a much more ideal place now and into the future.... hell, they might even have been able to take a run at Grant as a FA this summer.

STOMP

How would they have cap room to sign Grant this summer in your scenario?
 
How would they have cap room to sign Grant this summer in your scenario?
First off, having researched more, not possible/my bad. Obviously cap discussions are complex and where the team sits is related to who they retain/renounce etc. The extra flexiblity I'm alluding to is if they'd signed Looney (at lets say 9M per... he signed for 7.5M) instead of Nurk (17M), but then I forgot to add in Duren's money (4M). Even renouncing everyone else this offseason they'd have had a tough time putting together a competitive offer for Grant.

I still would be much happier about where they sit going into 2023-4 if the roster featured Looney and Duren (at 13M combined) then Nurk and Grant at (45M-ish). I don't think there will be a viable trade avenue available to become contenders so I'd rather they be perusing the slow build over the next couple offseasons. In the short term I think the D would be better and Duren has a very high ceiling IMO

STOMP
 
Last edited:
Duren has a very high ceiling IMO

Jalen Duren would've nice for Portland. I was big on both Jalen Duren and Walker Kessler and felt either would've been nice if Portland acquired the New Orleans pick......so far, it looks like they're doing decently in the league, wouldn't you say?

Now, I'm not trying to be a revisionist, pretending that I would've 100% selected Jokic if I was an NBA GM back in 2014. Instead, do you all want to know why I was big on those two particular centers?

Because, here is a neat threshold that I found in my research:

Since the modern era (1980s-present)
, traditional centers (the tall and muscular ones) that play a decent role on their Division I caliber teams, who averaged 12ppg/8.5 rpg per 28 minutes (28 mpg is reference to Shaq's freshmen year) on decent FG% (ex. 54+ FG%) as college freshmen, have gone on to have good to great careers in the NBA.

Now, obviously, the talent level varies but at minimum, they can make for productive starter material or elite back ups on playoff bound teams. In which case, let's have a look at the players who would qualify under these terms:

Shaq, David Robinson, Hakeem, Ralph Sampson, Embiid, KAT, DeMarcus Cousins, Ayton, Sam Bowie (yes, he probably would've been a pretty good player, actually), Greg Oden (would've been a great player).

There are 'lesser' prospects who aren't bad, either....Wendell Carter Jr., Robert Williams III, Hassan Whiteside. Obviously, Jalen Duren and Walker Kessler fit the profile and have put up good rookie numbers. Does Chet Holmgren count? I'm not sure...he's not exactly a traditional center due to his skinny frame but he does produce the numbers we're looking for.

Now, that doesn't mean players who don't meet the threshold aren't going to be great players. For example, Patrick Ewing, Alonzo Mourning, Bam Adebayo missed the cut off by a slight amount.

Rather, to me, it suggests that when you can put up that level of production relative to your age, you are probably a step above everyone else that you can come into the NBA and be productive. Again, the talent level varies. Blazer fans are likely familiar with Whiteside's level of play so you can't just look at stats alone. However, even a player like Whiteside can contribute heavily to wins or be a good back up center.

In this year's draft, there doesn't seem to be anyone else other than Zach Edey, who barely misses the cut off point by around .1 rebound per game. Zach Edey's game is slow but he has excellent footwork and height. It's possible he could be a good back up center, somewhere. If he does put up stats, which I think he can, it'll probably be like Hassan Whiteside or Enes Kanter, where it looks good but due to his mobility (or lack of), the defenses might take advantage of his presence.
 
Last edited:
I hope we keep our pick no matter where it falls and build a core that will be ready to compete in a few years with an aging-but-still-good Dame.
It's just that Dame has stated that he is not interested in that. So you want something for Dame that he does not want for himself. It's a lot like everyone who has been saying for years that they want Dame to leave the Blazers, that's not what he wants.

I think the exception might be if we land the number one pick.
 
It's just that Dame has stated that he is not interested in that. So you want something for Dame that he does not want for himself. It's a lot like everyone who has been saying for years that they want Dame to leave the Blazers, that's not what he wants.

I think the exception might be if we land the number one pick.

I get that. Which is why I think the message from Cronin has to be “this is the path that we believe represents the best chance at getting you a title over the course of your 5 year contract. If you disagree, you are welcome to request a trade. However, what we will not do is trade away our entire draft for the next 7 years to become a solid playoff team that is not considered elite.”
 
I get that. Which is why I think the message from Cronin has to be “this is the path that we believe represents the best chance at getting you a title over the course of your 5 year contract. If you disagree, you are welcome to request a trade. However, what we will not do is trade away our entire draft for the next 7 years to become a solid playoff team that is not considered elite.”
I think that's a logical point of view that you have. I don't know that our ceiling if we use all of the draft assets we can access in trades to get better immediately results in just a solid playoff team but again I'm not sure that we could get into that "elite" level. I hope we can because I believe Dame when he says that he's spoken with Joe a lot and that they are on the same page. Just a lot of wait and see right now.
 
Jalen Duren would've nice for Portland. I was big on both Jalen Duren and Walker Kessler and felt either would've been nice if Portland acquired the New Orleans pick......so far, it looks like they're doing decently in the league, wouldn't you say?

Now, I'm not trying to be a revisionist, pretending that I would've 100% selected Jokic if I was an NBA GM back in 2014. Instead, do you all want to know why I was big on those two particular centers?

Because, here is a neat threshold that I found in my research:

Since the modern era (1980s-present)
, traditional centers (the tall and muscular ones) that play a decent role on their Division I caliber teams, who averaged 12ppg/8.5 rpg per 28 minutes (28 mpg is reference to Shaq's freshmen year) on decent FG% (ex. 54+ FG%) as college freshmen, have gone on to have good to great careers in the NBA.

Now, obviously, the talent level varies but at minimum, they can make for productive starter material or elite back ups on playoff bound teams. In which case, let's have a look at the players who would qualify under these terms:

Shaq, David Robinson, Hakeem, Ralph Sampson, Embiid, KAT, DeMarcus Cousins, Ayton, Sam Bowie (yes, he probably would've been a pretty good player, actually), Greg Oden (would've been a great player).

There are 'lesser' prospects who aren't bad, either....Wendell Carter Jr., Robert Williams III, Hassan Whiteside. Obviously, Jalen Duren and Walker Kessler fit the profile and have put up good rookie numbers. Does Chet Holmgren count? I'm not sure...he's not exactly a traditional center due to his skinny frame but he does produce the numbers we're looking for.

Now, that doesn't mean players who don't meet the threshold aren't going to be great players. For example, Patrick Ewing, Alonzo Mourning, Bam Adebayo missed the cut off by a slight amount.

Rather, to me, it suggests that when you can put up that level of production relative to your age, you are probably a step above everyone else that you can come into the NBA and be productive. Again, the talent level varies. Blazer fans are likely familiar with Whiteside's level of play so you can't just look at stats alone. However, even a player like Whiteside can contribute heavily to wins or be a good back up center.

In this year's draft, there doesn't seem to be anyone else other than Zach Edey, who barely misses the cut off point by around .1 rebound per game. Zach Edey's game is slow but he has excellent footwork and height. It's possible he could be a good back up center, somewhere. If he does put up stats, which I think he can, it'll probably be like Hassan Whiteside or Enes Kanter, where it looks good but due to his mobility (or lack of), the defenses might take advantage of his presence.
Last offseason I honked the horn hard for Duren and thought the Blazers should have been considering him but was met with all sorts of detractors. A short list of the derogatory comparisons made included Stromile Swift, Ruben Boumtje-Boumtje, Clint Capela, DeWayne Dedmon, Hasaan Whiteside, Nerlens Noel, Hasheem Thabeet & Bismack Biyombo. Having transferred up a class, he was the youngest player in the league this season. I wanted him above all the other guys who went after the Blazers picked Sharpe.

btw, I didn't weigh in on Shaedon other then to relay I was impressed by his clear physical gifts and smooth jumper but didn't feel I had enough info

STOMP
 
I don’t think Duren showed anything this season that will leave us with major, extreme regret. He seems like he will evolve into at best a Clint Capela type, not a perennial all star. The offensive feel just isn’t there for him to be more than a rim running big.
 
It's just that Dame has stated that he is not interested in that. So you want something for Dame that he does not want for himself. It's a lot like everyone who has been saying for years that they want Dame to leave the Blazers, that's not what he wants.

I think the exception might be if we land the number one pick.

Pretty sure Dame has $250 million reasons to like it. Also, I seriously doubt there will be anything available for him in trade as teams would want to pair him with their good player(s), not just add him to a gutted team. He makes too much money. Players that are available are most likely Simmons or Robert. No thanks. As for building around him, I will patiently wait to hear the rumors. All I see speculated on this board are trades for SG or SF all the while we have Sharpe/Simons (SG) and Grant (SF). Siakam is a tweener like Grant, so that is duplication as well. People throw out names like Bam or Embiid but they are not available. They are thriving in the playoffs.
 
Last edited:
We're trading Dame and the pick for the rights to Stromile Swift.
 
Which part isn’t happening? The Blazers keeping the pick? Or Dame sticking around?
I posted on here last May that if we used our lottery pick last year and we were losing again, Dame would want out. I believe this is where we are at right now. Posted this last week.... Dame/Ant/Sharpe/Lottery Pick..... i think only 2 of those are here next September.
 
I posted on here last May that if we used our lottery pick last year and we were losing again, Dame would want out. I believe this is where we are at right now. Posted this last week.... Dame/Ant/Sharpe/Lottery Pick..... i think only 2 of those are here next September.
That’s very unfortunate.
The top end of the 2023 draft is loaded with forwards, and the Trail Blazer may be the team best equipped for a rookie forward to succeed if Dame stays.
 
I posted on here last May that if we used our lottery pick last year and we were losing again, Dame would want out. I believe this is where we are at right now. Posted this last week.... Dame/Ant/Sharpe/Lottery Pick..... i think only 2 of those are here next September.

Agreed. Dame and Sharpe will be here.
 
A mock draft with comments. After 2 they seem to have concerns: Miller considered an average athlete compared to NBA talent, “The Thompson twins are 20 years old playing against guys 16 and 17 years old,” an NBA scout told HoopsHype. “It’s tough to trust them. I don’t like their shooting forms at all.”
Walker:“He’s always been a role player,” an NBA scout told HoopsHype. “He reminds me of Patrick Williams when I watch him. You could draft him in the Top 5 because of his body and perceived upside, but he’s never done it as a lead guy. To me, you’ve got to do it at least at one level (high school or college). He’s always contributed to winning teams and is willing to accept any role on winning teams.”
https://hoopshype.com/lists/nba-mock-draft-scoot-henderson-brandon-miller-jarace-walker/
 
Last edited:
I still don’t think they’ll keep it

I would bet that the only way they do not keep #1 is if Wemby pulls a Kobe and lets them know he will only play for a big-market team. (Which is unlikely)

Wemby needs to be a long-term solution otherwise they might as well trade the pick. but again I doubt that will be the case. Adding him without giving up assets to match salaries, frees up those same assets to add yet another piece of the puzzle. The Blazers would have to be guaranteed a potential superstar in return for Victor. It would be interesting for sure to see the offers though.
 
Last offseason I honked the horn hard for Duren and thought the Blazers should have been considering him but was met with all sorts of detractors. A short list of the derogatory comparisons made included Stromile Swift, Ruben Boumtje-Boumtje, Clint Capela, DeWayne Dedmon, Hasaan Whiteside, Nerlens Noel, Hasheem Thabeet & Bismack Biyombo. Having transferred up a class, he was the youngest player in the league this season. I wanted him above all the other guys who went after the Blazers picked Sharpe.

btw, I didn't weigh in on Shaedon other then to relay I was impressed by his clear physical gifts and smooth jumper but didn't feel I had enough info

STOMP
I actually was with you on Duren. He was ready physically, and his skillset was perfect . But i think the Blazers have hit a home run with Sharpe. Sharpe needs to put the work in the way Dame does, and he could be a superstar.
 
A mock draft with comments. After 2 they seem to have concerns: Miller considered an average athlete compared to NBA talent, “The Thompson twins are 20 years old playing against guys 16 and 17 years old,” an NBA scout told HoopsHype. “It’s tough to trust them. I don’t like their shooting forms at all.”
Walker:“He’s always been a role player,” an NBA scout told HoopsHype. “He reminds me of Patrick Williams when I watch him. You could draft him in the Top 5 because of his body and perceived upside, but he’s never done it as a lead guy. To me, you’ve got to do it at least at one level (high school or college). He’s always contributed to winning teams and is willing to accept any role on winning teams.”
https://hoopshype.com/lists/nba-mock-draft-scoot-henderson-brandon-miller-jarace-walker/
There's one Lottery player in this draft for the Blazers, and that's Wemby. Pick# 2 and on is heading to the Nets for Bridges, or the Raptors for Siakam, IMO. I think the Celtics re-sign Jalen Brown at all cost, unless he demands a sign and trade outta there.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top