Projecting where our picks will be slated...

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

glazeduck

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2009
Messages
1,107
Likes
1,172
Points
113
Saw on twitter a few days ago - in response to Scott Foster apologizing for butchering LA's goaltending on February 6th against the Thunder - that that game was where things started unraveling, and I couldn't agree more. Now that we're definitely lottery bound, I decided to do a little "research" at how the lottery rankings will look at the end of the season...

So where do we end up?
Since that game, we're 7 - 14 (.333) and a lot of those losses have been drubbings. Since that game, we shipped off 2 starting veterans for little to no positive, on-court return, fired our coach, and had perhaps our most promising young player sustain a bad injury. Given all that's occurred and what's left: non-coach, tryout players, etc. I think it's fair to project that we finish our final 21 games slightly worse than the .333 pace since Fostergate - say 6-15 (.285) in our final 21 games, putting us at 27-39. I know we have a homestand coming, so this is likely to be give or take a few games.

So what does that mean for the lottery?

Charlotte (7-36), Washington (10-34) and New Orleans (11-34) seem to have the top 3 spots all but wrapped up.

After that, NJ (15-31), Toronto (15-30), Detroit (16-29), Sacramento (16-29), Cleveland (16-26), and Golden State (18-24) are all right in our range.

Since February 6th, here is how those teams have faired:

NJ: 7-15 (.318); worth noting their pickup of Gerald Wallace for free. Should give them at least a minor uptick in Ws.
TOR: 7-13 (.350)
DET: 10-9 (.526)
SAC: 8-14 (.363)
CLE: 7-13 (.350); worth mentioning they gave up Sessions for nothing, should give them a slight downtick.
GS: 10-11 (.476)

If each team continues at this pace for the rest of their season, this is what their projected records would be:

NJ: 21 or 22 Ws (45 or 44 Ls)
TOR: 22 or 23 WS (44 or 43 Ls)
SAC: 23 or 24 Ws (43 or 42 Ls)
CLE: 24 or 25 Ws (42 or 41 Ls)
DET: 27 - 39
PROJECTED PORTLAND SLOT: 27-39
GS: 29 or 30 Ws (37 or 36 Ls)

Should be interesting to see how things play out. Obviously this doesn't take into account future injuries, home/away games, strength of schedule, playoff teams resting their starters, future staff or roster movements, etc. but clearly Detroit is trending in one direction, we're trending in the other. It would appear Cleveland, w/ trading away Sessions will finish below us, and if this all holds true, NJ WILL be in that 4th spot. Certainly makes for a little nervousness, but hopefully GWall will be enough to bump them above some of Toronto, Sacramento or Cleveland.

If this holds - we'd have the 9th lottery slot, but clearly we'd have to tank pretty drastically to improve much on that... Here's to hopin some of these teams get hot!
 
Last edited:
My guess is that the Nets pick will be the sixth and the Blazers will pick eleventh. Still good enough to either add two pretty good prospects or maybe even move up a couple of spots if they really like someone (Drummond, Robinson, etc.). We'll see what happens I guess?
 
Hopefully, our picks will end up in another team's hands, in exchange for a superstar.

I'm tired of being an extension of the D league.
 
Hopefully, our picks will end up in another team's hands, in exchange for a superstar.

I'm tired of being an extension of the D league.

That's nice, but who do we get without giving up a talented player we need to keep?
 
My guess is NJ gets into the top 3 and Portland makes the 8th seed, so I guess 16th
 
My guess is NJ gets into the top 3 and Portland makes the 8th seed, so I guess 16th

Could be worse, we get a top 2 protected pick on a team that will be bad after they lose Dwill as a FA. Not like we win the lottery use it on Anothony Davis only to have him step off the plane and his knees explode.
 
FYI, at present NBADraft.net has us getting Kidd-Gilchrist with the #5 and Austin Rivers with #11. I think I could get behind that.
 
FYI, at present NBADraft.net has us getting Kidd-Gilchrist with the #5 and Austin Rivers with #11. I think I could get behind that.

Since Rivers has been brought up, I looked into him. That kid is a damn good prospect. Possibly a playmaking wing player.
 
FYI, at present NBADraft.net has us getting Kidd-Gilchrist with the #5 and Austin Rivers with #11. I think I could get behind that.

That would be an awesome draft haul. I love Rivers, but would ship him to his dad's watch in BOS for Rondo in a hurry.
 
I have seen MKG compared to Gerald Wallace pretty much everywhere, that would be trippy to trade old Gerald for young Gerald.
 
So if, by some miracle, we got #4 or #5 pick; which center is better? I haven't paid attention to these college kids.

Draft Express says Drummond is better than Sullinger. Which would you take?
 
Drummond will be gone by then, most likely. He is the better prospect
 
So if, by some miracle, we got #4 or #5 pick; which center is better? I haven't paid attention to these college kids.

Draft Express says Drummond is better than Sullinger. Which would you take?

Sullinger is a below the rim, shortish, 280 pound guy with (rumored) legs of different lengths and he's had trouble staying healthy at Ohio State (sound familiar?) Drummond is a super raw 6'11" guy who blocks shots at a very high rate, has NBA level athleticism and length and is going to need some time to develop, but has a much higher celing than Sullinger.

I'm biased, I always lean towards athletes at the center spot over "good college player" guys (Howard vs. Okafor for instance), so I'd go with Drummond.
 
Drummond will be gone by then, most likely. He is the better prospect

If he goes in the top three that means MKG or Thomas Robinson will slip to 4th ... I'd take either of those guys in a heartbeat (assuming we could get to 4th)
 
Oh because draftexpress has this format: #1, Anthony Davis, #2 MKG, #3 THomas Robinson, #4 Drummond, #5 Sullinger

So? Jonathan Givony is a pretty smart guy, but last I checked he doesn't have a crystal ball.
 
I think we should be targeting the Thunder with those picks. They can't keep all four of Westbrook/Durant/Harden/Ibaka long-term.

I think either Ibaka or Harden would fit nicely w/Batum & Aldridge personally.

Ibaka for NJ's pick (if 4/5/6)? Would he be worth it? Might need to stay competitive to keep Aldridge and bigs generally take longer to develop in general. This makes Aldridge somewhat of a five, but it keeps him in the post. We can straight up absorb him w/cap space I think.

OR

Matthews and #12 for Harden (resigned)?

They'd save money on Matthews cheap contract (of which we've already paid quite a bit of through that huge signing bonus). Is it enough of an upgrade for us to go through with it? Do you guys like the fit? I think Harden is extremely well rounded and it'd be fun to have that beard here.
 
I think we should be targeting the Thunder with those picks. They can't keep all four of Westbrook/Durant/Harden/Ibaka long-term.

I think either Ibaka or Harden would fit nicely w/Batum & Aldridge personally.

Ibaka for NJ's pick (if 4/5/6)? Would he be worth it? Might need to stay competitive to keep Aldridge and bigs generally take longer to develop in general. This makes Aldridge somewhat of a five, but it keeps him in the post. We can straight up absorb him w/cap space I think.

OR

Matthews and #12 for Harden (resigned)?

They'd save money on Matthews cheap contract (of which we've already paid quite a bit of through that huge signing bonus). Is it enough of an upgrade for us to go through with it? Do you guys like the fit? I think Harden is extremely well rounded and it'd be fun to have that beard here.

I will agree with Nic on what he mentioned on another thread. I will shit if OKC trades with their division rivals; especially players at the caliber of Westbrook, Harding or Ibaka.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top