- Joined
- May 24, 2007
- Messages
- 73,114
- Likes
- 10,945
- Points
- 113
Iran does not wish to protect the status quo. Pakistan does not wish to protect the status quo. Russia does not wish to protect the status quo. Hamas does not wish to protect the status quo. Sudan does not wish to protect the status quo. Venezuela does not wish to protect the status quo. I could go on and on and on and on. International relations are about expansion being resisted by other forces. It's dynamic.
The status quo is "who is running the nation."
Nations don't have to deal with us. There are plenty of other customers.
Take a look at the trade deficit and get back to me on this one.
I care. Do you wish to live under a Fascist- (Germanic/Italian/Japanese), Soviet- or Chinese-dominated world order? Our wars haven't been futile. We're enriched by them because free trade makes everyone weathier.
Denny, I think we're just going to have to agree to disagree. That isolationist foreign policy is what separates me from the Libertarians the most. I could get past the drug issue, but the naivete on international affairs to me is just too much.
You got the "free trade makes everyone wealthier" part right.
As for the fascists, there's no evidence they could have maintained a world domination. Their economies were entirely funded with the gold of nations they conquered.
The soviets couldn't dominate Eastern Europe for all that long. And when they did, look at East Germany vs. West Germany - it was a sharp contrast in success. So I'd think the Russkies would ultimately want to deal with us.
You spoke of a void to be filled. Who left the void we filled, and where are they now? The answer implies that we'll end up following that same path, if history repeats itself.




