Politics Public Impeachment Hearings

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
I loved how the press secretary said they were only second and third hand witnesses...

But the administration blocked all first hand witnesses... Hmm... If they had nothing to hide, why block (obstruct) people with first hand knowledge.

Were not all fucking stupid.
 
MARIS61 said:
As expected, Clowns came up empty and the fake impeachment is an even bigger fiasco than the Clinton 2016 failure.

Must be embarrassing for Dems to "witness".

Fun to watch. :bwpopcorn:
Click to expand...


Dems obviously putting their weakest witnesses first
 
It’s adorable that the resident Trumpkins think today went well for the big Orange.
 
OMG, Trump showed up to the impeachment hearings in a disguise today.
 
So, had a super busy week.... Not that, thats important but catching up on news and stuff and this whole thing seems like a joke, this country is so divided they cant even tell who’s winning and who’s losing. Every left leaning site seems to think this was the worst day ever for Trump. Every somewhat right leaning site seems to be like oh Trumps winning!! Then as Ive caught up here its basically the same...

Have we all lost our minds so much that we dont even know whats a win and a loss??? Imagine leaving a Blazer game, and both teams are all excited their team won, and the other team got smoked!

Seriously just weird...
 
Last edited:
2cmjpTH.jpg
 
Strenuus said:
I loved how the press secretary said they were only second and third hand witnesses...

But the administration blocked all first hand witnesses... Hmm... If they had nothing to hide, why block (obstruct) people with first hand knowledge.

Were not all fucking stupid.
Click to expand...

Don't you also find it odd that the Reps and Trump are complaining because the Dems won't allow Schiff and the whistleblower and others to testify, but Trump won't allow his henchmen with first hand knowledge to testify.

...nice double standard.
 
What a hilarious farce.

Most Dems suddenly silent about it while desperate to change the subject.

Reps will regain the house,
 
MARIS61 said:
What a hilarious farce.

Most Dems suddenly silent about it while desperate to change the subject.

Reps will regain the house,
Click to expand...

Well, I suppose that everyone has to have their dreams.
 
MARIS61 said:
What a hilarious farce.

Most Dems suddenly silent about it while desperate to change the subject.

Reps will regain the house,
Click to expand...
I've asked you a thousand times to express your confidence by making a bet. How wouldn't you love to shut my Liberal mouth by winning? How about that bet? As it is, you're expressing your confidence by not making the bet.
 
MarAzul said:
The WSJ has it about right.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/this-impeachment-subverts-the-constitution-11572040762
My take is, the Democrats now are in uncharted territory. Using impeachment as a tool of sedition.
Never before has impeachment been entirely a partisan effort, damn near the definition of sedition.
Click to expand...

And never before have we had a POTUS who is as cruel, insulting, ignorant, bombastic, etc., as Trump. And never have we had a party blindly supporting this idiot president strictly for partisan reasons no matter what, so yeah, it is partisan.
 
At
yankeesince59 said:
And never before have we had a POTUS who is as cruel, insulting, ignorant, bombastic, etc., as Trump. And never have we had a party blindly supporting this idiot president strictly for partisan reasons no matter what, so yeah, it is partisan.
Click to expand...

At any rate, I'm loving the SC judges he's appointed. Fits my world view.
 
ABM said:
At


At any rate, I'm loving the SC judges he's appointed. Fits my world view.
Click to expand...

Aren't SC rulings supposed to be based on actual law and The Constitution, regardless of political affiliation or "world view"?
 
ABM said:
At


At any rate, I'm loving the SC judges he's appointed. Fits my world view.
Click to expand...

and as we have witnessed before, and much like your boy trump, it's all about you and the hell with your fellow man. Would you be opposed to a vote on the abortion issue? or do you think it's more important that a man that is a proven misogynist make the decision?
 
CupWizier said:
and as we have witnessed before, and much like your boy trump, it's all about you and the hell with your fellow man. Would you be opposed to a vote on the abortion issue? or do you think it's more important that a man that is a proven misogynist make the decision?
Click to expand...

Me, and about half the nation.
 
ABM said:
Me, and about half the nation.
Click to expand...
This post is so 2016 in nature....currently he's losing friends across the board...of the almost hundred conservatives he's insulted, fired or intimidated...some in jail...how many networking friends do they have? Snowballing effect and now with his witness tampering on record...watch them scramble for the exits writing "I told you so" books before they get caught up in the whole mess. The Supreme court is your victory as a conservative...the presidency is not a victory however
 
riverman said:
This post is so 2016 in nature....currently he's losing friends across the board...of the almost hundred conservatives he's insulted, fired or intimidated...some in jail...how many networking friends do they have? Snowballing effect and now with his witness tampering on record...watch them scramble for the exits writing "I told you so" books before they get caught up in the whole mess. The Supreme court is your victory as a conservative...the presidency is not a victory however
Click to expand...

I assume he is talking about the abortion issue.

Currently there are about 20% of the country that believe in abortion is illegal no matter what.

About 50% that believe that abortion should be illegal in some situations (I suspect that this really means late term).

So, I would argue that Mr. ABM mistakenly thinks about the last statistics when he says about half the country - but I am willing to bet that where he puts the "should be illegal" line at is very different from what these 50% think.

(This data is all based on a the following data - so you will know I am not pulling it out of my rear end: https://news.gallup.com/poll/1576/abortion.aspx )
 
andalusian said:
I assume he is talking about the abortion issue.

Currently there are about 20% of the country that believe in abortion is illegal no matter what.

About 50% that believe that abortion should be illegal in some situations (I suspect that this really means late term).

So, I would argue that Mr. ABM mistakenly thinks about the last statistics when he says about half the country - but I am willing to bet that where he puts the "should be illegal" line at is very different from what these 50% think.
Click to expand...
Doesn't the numbers show high 40%’s consider themselves pro-choice and high 40%’s consider themselves pro-life?
 
Lanny said:
I've asked you a thousand times to express your confidence by making a bet. How wouldn't you love to shut my Liberal mouth by winning? How about that bet? As it is, you're expressing your confidence by not making the bet.
Click to expand...

Lanny, I have an idea. I'll hold the bet for both you and maris...How 'bout if you and he agree on the amount you wish to wager and you can both deposit the funds into my paypal account...and I'll forward the winnings to the winner.
 
TorturedBlazerFan said:
Doesn't the numbers show high 40%’s consider themselves pro-choice and high 40%’s consider themselves pro-life?
Click to expand...

He specifically stated the half in reference to "vote on the abortion issue"

I took him at face value.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top