o.iatlhawksfan
ROFLMFAO!!!!
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2007
- Messages
- 3,907
- Likes
- 1
- Points
- 38
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Kid Chocolate @ Jun 21 2008, 02:36 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (o.iatlhawksfan @ Jun 21 2008, 12:22 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div><div class='quotemain'><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>Brook Lopez is considered by some to be the best Center in the draft and at one point was predicted to be the third pick, but he has some significant flaws. His twin brother is the better defender and Brook was a pretty inefficient scorer in college for a 7 footer. I highly doubt Brook would be effective as an NBA Power Forward, especially after his poor combine numbers so I don’t see a twin tower combination of him and Darko being effective (although Darko has played some Power Forward).
In the final analysis, I just have no faith that Brook will be a better pro than Love so I have Love as the #5 pick.</div>
what what what“?
What this BS
Averaging 19 a game, with no other offensive threat on your team, is not a effective scorer? Than you add Robin is a better defender? hell no! Robin got most of his blocks from the weak side, Brook is a far better one on one defender than he is. Who was asked to guard Spencer Hawes and kevin love not Robin.
and what with putting so much on combine numbers, Josh Smith wasn't the better athlete according to his combine numbers than Than Kris Humphries, but when the game is being played can you actually tell.
</div>
Brook was inefficient...he shot 46.8% from the field.
In comparison of other top big men.
The Lovemaker: 55.9%
Beasley: 53.2%
Robin Lopez: 53.4%
Kosta Koufos: 50.8%
Javale McGree: 52.9%
Deandre Jordan: 61.7%
Darrell Arthur: 54.3%
Marreese Spegihts: 62.4%
Roy Hibbert 60.9%
Devon Hardin: 55.4%
JJ Hickson: 59.1%
the list goes on and on...Brook's not even close, he's by far a the low end.
</div>
That's BS, Brook was in a way thougher situation than any player on that list. When you look at the players around him, and the conference he had to play in. And Robin Lopez please...This is a guy who got most of his pts of put back, and slashing the only time he had to face double teams was when his brother was on the bench. For him to be shoothing 53% shows you how overrated he is.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>1) Learn the difference between efficient and effective</div>
A player who leads his team to the second round of the tournament, with players who can't even beat a mid major team around him, is efficent enough for me.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>2) Defense is not just one on one</div>
So the fact that Brook being asked to guard the best big for every team is irrelevant
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>3) Robin is definitely the better defensive player</div>
Why because he gets a couple of weak side blocks?So If you wanted someone to stick someone like Al Jefferson, and I guess you pick someone like Josh Smith over Tim Duncan. correct?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>4) The Josh Smith combine comparison is ridiculous. Brook isn't some immature High School senior</div>
Brook is one year younger than Josh when he entered the draft
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>5) The combine numbers confirm what many of us have observed about Brook's (lack of) athleticism</div>
combine numbers= Shit.
In the final analysis, I just have no faith that Brook will be a better pro than Love so I have Love as the #5 pick.</div>
what what what“?
What this BS
Averaging 19 a game, with no other offensive threat on your team, is not a effective scorer? Than you add Robin is a better defender? hell no! Robin got most of his blocks from the weak side, Brook is a far better one on one defender than he is. Who was asked to guard Spencer Hawes and kevin love not Robin.
and what with putting so much on combine numbers, Josh Smith wasn't the better athlete according to his combine numbers than Than Kris Humphries, but when the game is being played can you actually tell.
</div>
Brook was inefficient...he shot 46.8% from the field.
In comparison of other top big men.
The Lovemaker: 55.9%
Beasley: 53.2%
Robin Lopez: 53.4%
Kosta Koufos: 50.8%
Javale McGree: 52.9%
Deandre Jordan: 61.7%
Darrell Arthur: 54.3%
Marreese Spegihts: 62.4%
Roy Hibbert 60.9%
Devon Hardin: 55.4%
JJ Hickson: 59.1%
the list goes on and on...Brook's not even close, he's by far a the low end.
</div>
That's BS, Brook was in a way thougher situation than any player on that list. When you look at the players around him, and the conference he had to play in. And Robin Lopez please...This is a guy who got most of his pts of put back, and slashing the only time he had to face double teams was when his brother was on the bench. For him to be shoothing 53% shows you how overrated he is.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>1) Learn the difference between efficient and effective</div>
A player who leads his team to the second round of the tournament, with players who can't even beat a mid major team around him, is efficent enough for me.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>2) Defense is not just one on one</div>
So the fact that Brook being asked to guard the best big for every team is irrelevant
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>3) Robin is definitely the better defensive player</div>
Why because he gets a couple of weak side blocks?So If you wanted someone to stick someone like Al Jefferson, and I guess you pick someone like Josh Smith over Tim Duncan. correct?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>4) The Josh Smith combine comparison is ridiculous. Brook isn't some immature High School senior</div>
Brook is one year younger than Josh when he entered the draft
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div><div class='quotemain'>5) The combine numbers confirm what many of us have observed about Brook's (lack of) athleticism</div>
combine numbers= Shit.
