BBert
Weasels Ripped My Flesh
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2008
- Messages
- 26,749
- Likes
- 20,540
- Points
- 113
Sounds about right1. Dame
2. CJ
3. Seth Curry
4. Anfernee
5. ET
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Sounds about right1. Dame
2. CJ
3. Seth Curry
4. Anfernee
5. ET
1c) kyrie Irvine
We'll find out in the NBA Finals starting May 30th at the Moda Center.
If we're gonna beat Warriors/Rockets, we can beat Bucks too.We need to root for Celtics and Sixers. We get HCA over them in Finals.
I don't get why some of you and ESPN list Harden @ PG. If he is a PG, what does that make Chris Paul?
Paul is a point guard too. D'Antoni has said a number of times since he became Houston's coach that Harden was his point guard. If the Blazers had traded for Paul while keeping Lillard, would that have meant Lillard stopped being a point guard? Harden definitely plays like a point guard in D'Antoni's system, IMO.
We need to redefine positions then if a team can have two point guards.Paul is a point guard too. D'Antoni has said a number of times since he became Houston's coach that Harden was his point guard. If the Blazers had traded for Paul while keeping Lillard, would that have meant Lillard stopped being a point guard? Harden definitely plays like a point guard in D'Antoni's system, IMO.
I think, as a fan, I contribute to the Blazers success so I should be considered a point guard as well.
We need to redefine positions then if a team can have two point guards.
So you do think that if Paul joined the Blazers, Lillard would cease to be a point guard?
I didn't say anything about "contributing to success." I said that I think Harden definitely plays like a point guard for Houston, since D'Antoni took over.
I think that's a false equivalence. Harden has been considered a SG his whole career. Dame hasn't. We wouldn't ever have tried to trade for Paul. Houston did.So you do think that if Paul joined the Blazers, Lillard would cease to be a point guard?
I think that's a false equivalence. Harden has been considered a SG his whole career. Dame hasn't. We wouldn't ever have tried to trade for Paul. Houston did.
Harden has been considered a point guard, including by his own coach, since D'Antoni took over. And I'd hope that the Blazers would have traded for Paul if they could have gotten him relatively cheaply, because he's really talented. You can make it work with two point guards, as Houston has. In some sense, you're getting way too focused on the term "point guard," and viewing it as a singular thing. Harden has been and still is the main ball-handler and play-maker for his team. He's tasked with the majority of the breaking down of defenses and distributing to teammates. That's what a point guard does. In this era, point guards also are often top scorers for their teams too (not just Harden, but Curry, Lillard, Wall, Irving, etc) so the fact that Harden scores a ton doesn't really change anything. As D'Antoni says, he's been using Harden like a super-charged Steve Nash.
Yes, D'Antoni had that one interview where he called Harden a PG. In 2016-17, I agree with you even if he started Beverley next to him.Harden has been considered a point guard, including by his own coach, since D'Antoni took over. And I'd hope that the Blazers would have traded for Paul if they could have gotten him relatively cheaply, because he's really talented. You can make it work with two point guards, as Houston has. In some sense, you're getting way too focused on the term "point guard," and viewing it as a singular thing. Harden has been and still is the main ball-handler and play-maker for his team. He's tasked with the majority of the breaking down of defenses and distributing to teammates. That's what a point guard does. In this era, point guards also are often top scorers for their teams too (not just Harden, but Curry, Lillard, Wall, Irving, etc) so the fact that Harden scores a ton doesn't really change anything. As D'Antoni says, he's been using Harden like a super-charged Steve Nash.
Yes, D'Antoni had that one interview where he called Harden a PG. In 2016-17, I agree with you even if he started Beverley next to him.
But Harden has been the primary SG since they got CP. Lineup data shows as much.
Lineup data doesn't matter. What matters is the actual role he plays in their offense, and his role is the same one Lillard plays for the Blazers--main ball-handler, main distributor, main decision-maker for the offense. Paul provides secondary play-making and takes over those roles when he's on the floor without Harden.
Do you consider Lebron/Giannis/Griffin/Mitchell/Lou Williams/Beal/Booker to be point guards?As I said earlier, if we are going with this, then we need to redefine the position.Lineup data doesn't matter. What matters is the actual role he plays in their offense, and his role is the same one Lillard plays for the Blazers--main ball-handler, main distributor, main decision-maker for the offense. Paul provides secondary play-making and takes over those roles when he's on the floor without Harden.

main ball-handler, main distributor, main decision-maker for the offense.
So would you rank Pippen as one of the top point guards of all time?
Side note - these roles are not mutually exclusive with point guard. The OP asked for top 5 point guards. Not top 5 distributors/playmakers.
Do you consider Lebron/Giannis/Griffin/Mitchell/Lou Williams/Beal/Booker to be point guards?As I said earlier, if we are going with this, then we need to redefine the position.
IMO, the only other option is to define positions based on who they defend, but that gets dicey when guys defend different positions often or play in switching defenses. Klay Thompson often defends point guards, but I wouldn't say that makes him the Warriors' point guard.
