- Joined
- Sep 16, 2008
- Messages
- 26,226
- Likes
- 14,407
- Points
- 113
How about defining their positions by considering who else they can play with without taking a massive step back on defense or offense?
Can Dame play with another 6' guard in the backcourt with him? No. Then, Dame can't be anything more than a "point" guard. Can Harden? Yes. And he has been for every year in his career. So he cannot by definition be the de facto point guard.
Defining players by size rather than role makes absolutely no sense, IMO. By your definition, if Damon Stoudamire and James Harden played together, Stoudamire would "have to be" the point guard because he's smaller, even though Harden is a far, far, far better point guard. If a point guard is not the guard that takes on the role of lead ball-handler, distributor and decision-maker, then yeah, position designations don't mean anything.
And, honestly, position designations mean less and less these days. Curry is a "point guard," but the Warriors' system decentralizes the passing and play-making, empowering power forwad Draymond Green and swingman Andre Iguodala to be important play-makers, or even centers like Andrew Bogut. But as far as I'm concerned, if people want to ask about point guards, Harden's role falls squarely within it.
