Rask Signs

[theProdigy223]

8 years, 7m per.

The baseline for Hank has been set.

 

[chuckd3534]

To me, that is the number. Maybe a little more so Hank can be # 1, but 7.5 tops IMO. 8 years 60 mill. 7.5 mill per year. Done.

 

[NYR31]

To me, that is the number. Maybe a little more so Hank can be # 1, but 7.5 tops IMO. 8 years 60 mill. 7.5 mill per year. Done.

You were about $1.5M/yr off on Rask, hopefully that doesn't mean you're off $1.5M on Hank as well.

 

[Disturbed]

I don't see this as a good sign....

 

[BigDaddyAl1973]

Oh shit..7 million for above average..hank is smiling big time. ..bad move by boston

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

[chuckd3534]

You were about $1.5M/yr off on Rask, hopefully that doesn't mean you're off $1.5M on Hank as well.

Words really cannot stress enough how much of an a** you are 31. How was your call on McDonagh? Remember when I was an idiot because I said he would get at least 4 mill and a longer deal and you said I guess you don't know how Sather operates. Remember that 31? But of course I wouldn't mention that, why would I? It doesn't affect me what you say. BUT of course the reverse is not true because you are a loser.

You may be the only person on these boards that would post what you just did. You have some serious issues dude.

Once again I say let's meet so I can punch you right in your smug face.

You simply cannot help it. No clue what your issue is with me, but it is clear there is one. This board has been around for about a week or so now, and at least 4 or 5 times you decide let me single out chuck's post and start s*it. Everyone sees it on here. It is clear as day. I asked you like 4 times stop and let it go. I don't want to carry the BS over to this board, but you simply cannot help it. You are a massive loser dude. I am fed up with your BS.

 

[chuckd3534]

And BTW...I am not predicting anything with Hank. I hope he doesn't get more than 7.5 per. I actually fear he will though. In the 8's at least IMO.

 

[Messiah717]

ha ha the fighting has begun.

 

[NYR31]

Chuck, lol, you gotta relax a bit, buddy.

Al, the rumor a couple weeks ago was Rask wanted 6.5M/per which i thought was a bit high and even more so that he got $7M. I think he's one of the best in the game, yes, but should not be tied for 1st in salary.

Henrik's price just went up to $8M+

 

[chuckd3534]

ha ha the fighting has begun.

Not on my end Mess. Not once do I ever go out of my way to get into it with 31. Yet time after time he has to chime in with his BS towards me from out of LF. I don't understand what his issue is. Literally 3 or 4 times since this new board has started I said nicely to him enough dude let it go. But he simply cannot stop. Every time there is a back and forth with us he starts it. EVERY SINGLE TIME.

Not sure what his issue is, but clearly he has an issue with me.

 

[chuckd3534]

I don't see this as a good sign....

It is not a good sign at all. If one were a betting man you'd have to bet Hank gets over 8 mill per now, if not more. And I don't like it.

 

[Messiah717]

Don't get worried about it. Hank will get taken care of. His cap hit is almost seven million now. The cap will increase next year and money will be coming off the books. He will get a long contract and end his career a Ranger.

 

[theProdigy223]

I see him at 8m which is not the end of the world

 

[BigDaddyAl1973]

9million 3 years..how many good years has rask given...1 shortened year?

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

[Messiah717]

Offer Hank 8 years at $60 million.

 

[dumpstralmannow]

This is why teams have cap issues. There was no reason for Boston to offer Rask that type of money. He's started two years. Absurd. Philly does the same thing with young players which is why they are stupid. You don't throw tons of money at young players when you don't have to.

 

[chuckd3534]

Offer Hank 8 years at $60 million.

Yeah, that's what I said above also. 7.5 per. It makes sense, I just don't know if Hank would take that.

From where I sit it makes sense. Hank says winning is # 1. That's what he cares about. So prove it. Take a great deal that will still make him the highest paid goalie in the NHL per season, and allow the Rangers to keep that extra million or so to sign other guys. Hank also makes money off the ice, so I am pretty sure that a 60 mill contract will put him in the great spot for life.

The issue with stuff like this is it becomes more than about the player. Like the union, and other goalies, will want Hank to get everything he can so he can set the bar.

We'll see how it goes, but again if I were a betting man I would say he gets over an 8 mill per contract. We'll see.

 

[chuckd3534]

And yeah...the Rask contract is nuts. I was thinking 5.5 per...maybe 6. To give a goalie who has played one season a 7 mill per contract, is a bit crazy. He is the highest paid goalie in the NHL, along with Rinne, per season. We'll see if the Bruins were smart or stupid on that one.

 

[Disturbed]

Once again one of the biggest hypocrites in the NHL strikes...Jacobs is always crying foul on the NHL economics and his power/influence is the biggest reason we had the latest lockout....and he just gave a goalie who wasn't a UFA $7m yr

 

[BigDaddyAl1973]

Once again one of the biggest hypocrites in the NHL strikes...Jacobs is always crying foul on the NHL economics and his power/influence is the biggest reason we had the latest lockout....and he just gave a goalie who wasn't a UFA $7m yr

Bingo....I was saying that all along

Sent from my SPH-L710 using Tapatalk 4 Beta

 

[Messiah717]

The same owners who will bitch and moan some years down the line and beg to be saved from the horrible contracts they handed out.