- Joined
- Sep 15, 2008
- Messages
- 34,552
- Likes
- 25,726
- Points
- 113
I didn't read his article to have anything to do with HI being an outlier.
Maybe you want to read it again.
Don't think I really need to, since the bulk of the article is talking specifically about treating HI as an outlier. But just in case you missed it - even though you quoted it yourself earlier in the thread - here is the relevant portion:
Nate made much ado of Rasmussen's worst poll ever in his analysis. The critique is germane, but not in the statistical sense. It would certainly be, by Nate's own god statistics, an outlier and as such should have been removed from Nate's accuracy model.
The words "worst poll ever" are a link to the HI poll.
barfo
