Redistribution of GPA.

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

huevonkiller

Change (Deftones)
Joined
Jul 24, 2006
Messages
25,798
Likes
90
Points
48
We need to redistribute GPA, since it is only fair to share the wealth.

A California college student is conducting a social experiment where he’s trying to get his peers to sign a petition in favor of distributing grade point averages to show how the federal government distributes wealth.

Oliver Darcy, a recent college graduate, proposes that students with good grades contribute their GPA to their academically sluggish friends. He argues that this is how the federal government takes wealth from the country’s high wage earners and distributes it to the low income earners.

“They all earn their GPA,” said Darcy in an interview with "Fox and Friends." “So we asked them if they’d be interested in redistributing the GPA points that they earned to students who may be having trouble getting a high GPA.”

Darcy, who films his encounters with teachers and fellow students, doesn’t have much luck selling this theory.

He said many students on college campuses support high taxes on the rich, but when put into relative terms, cringed at the thought of spreading around their academic wealth.

In a video posted on Exposingleftists.com, one student said, “If I do give GPA points to students that don’t deserve it, it isn’t fair, I work for what I have.”

Oliver also goes around campus asking whether students want to sign his petition to pay their share of the national debt – which amounts to nearly $47,000 per person.

This, too, brought mixed reaction, with one student saying the debt isn’t hers because she didn't contribute to it.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/08/1...ion-are-asked-to-support-grade/#ixzz1VLPyZ6uH

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2011/08/1...alth-distribution-are-asked-to-support-grade/

Lol yeah right.
 
Last edited:
Shouldn't that be from the Onion?
 
Yeah it should be, unfortunately its also legit socialism.

but for the fact that it's not, you have a point. money is collected for the betterment of society, GPA's aren't.

Me getting a 4.0 doesn't do much of anything (yes, I know it can lead to a better job opportunity), whereas me paying taxes, or having the money collected from my taxes distributed for the betterment of the society does.

It's a really lame argument to make actually (not you personally), because "sharing" GPA doesn't provide you with more services that are on par with what sharing wealth could do.
 
Yeah I'm not trying to single anyone out this is just an ideological discussion.

but for the fact that it's not, you have a point. money is collected for the betterment of society, GPA's aren't.

Money is collected for the detriment of society, mostly because unintended consequences are never considered. Socialism thinks two objects have the same value at all times but in specific circumstances platinum is worthless and food is invaluable. Socialism is not able to adjust for real world situations and it is proven entrepreneurs do much more with 50000 than you or the government ever will. And they help the poor much better by keeping their wealth.

For example I would never want to live in New York, even if their weather magically became ideal for me. Their taxes are abhorring.
Me getting a 4.0 doesn't do much of anything (yes, I know it can lead to a better job opportunity), whereas me paying taxes, or having the money collected from my taxes distributed for the betterment of the society does.

Sure it does, number one it is called graduate school you can't get into it. Second people can not graduate from college without a certain GPA, and college graduates earn a million dollars more during their lifetimes.

Also Scholarships are based on GPA and grants. Yeah big details you just missed.

It's a really lame argument to make actually (not you personally), because "sharing" GPA doesn't provide you with more services that are on par with what sharing wealth could do.

Well you don't understand the purpose of going to college then, which is to graduate. Or move up the ladder and eventually become a professor, or what not.
 
Last edited:
People are all for others giving them money and government bling, but very few are willing to give to others. That should come as no surprise.
 
money collected benefits the whole (and in some cases, and bfwa said, is detrimental). My taxes help others.

my GPA helps me. My GPA going to Tim Johnson because he's a dullard doesn't help me. my taxes going to pay for police, streets, government, does.
 
I would give up some of my GPA if it meant another undergraduate would graduate instead of fail.

Maybe it's not fair, maybe the student dogged it the whole time, maybe I worked much harder while they played . . . or maybe the student was a single mother working two jobs and going to school, maybe they were ill and unable to study and do treatment, maybe they have a learning disability and they actually worked twice as hard as me.

I don't know what the situation is but if giving a person a little GPA of mine has a chance of really helping one of my fellow students in life . . . well I see it as a way of giving back to the school that has helped me in life.
 
money collected benefits the whole

No it doesn't since there is no such thing as revenue. There is no net gain, in fact you're funneling the money into less efficient channels.
(and in some cases, and bfwa said, is detrimental). My taxes help others.

They help deter companies, and decrease the efficiency of the economy. This is simply a fact, you need to stop adding your personal moral beliefs.

my GPA helps me. My GPA going to Tim Johnson because he's a dullard doesn't help me. my taxes going to pay for police, streets, government, does.

Your GPA helps me get thousands of dollars actually, you don't know what argument you're making.

Your money goes into public sector versions of profitable companies. For example the airline industry used to be public sector, now it isn't and is much better. Stop dude.
 
I would give up some of my GPA if it meant another undergraduate would graduate instead of fail.

Maybe it's not fair, maybe the student dogged it the whole time, maybe I worked much harder while they played . . . or maybe the student was a single mother working two jobs and going to school, maybe they were ill and unable to study and do treatment, maybe they have a learning disability and they actually worked twice as hard as me.

I don't know what the situation is but if giving a person a little GPA of mine has a chance of really helping one of my fellow students in life . . . well I see it as a way of giving back to the school that has helped me in life.

That's fine if you want to believe that, just don't force your GPA sharing on other people.

Not everyone feels the need to help bad students who are more likely to fail in the future than you.
 
For example the airline industry used to be public sector, now it isn't and is much better. Stop dude.

Oh, this I've gotta hear. In what way is the airline industry 'much better'?

barfo
 
They're called bailouts, just by letting companies fail we save millions.

I should know by now not to ask, but what the hell are you talking about? The airline bailouts after 9/11? You think we should have given Bin Laden a much bigger victory by allowing the airline industry to collapse?

That's... interesting, if that's what you are saying.

barfo
 
I should know by now not to ask, but what the hell are you talking about? The airline bailouts after 9/11? You think we should have given Bin Laden a much bigger victory by allowing the airline industry to collapse?

That's... interesting, if that's what you are saying.

barfo

Man barfo you're really losing it. It happened in 1978. .-.

Strikeout.
 
Man barfo you're really losing it. It happened in 1978. .-.

Strikeout.

Sorry I can't understand you, but you don't make much sense a lot of the time. 1978 was airline deregulation. What does that have to do with bailouts?

barfo
 
Sorry I can't understand you, but you don't make much sense a lot of the time. 1978 was airline deregulation. What does that have to do with bailouts?

barfo

What other act is there where that particular market was freed? Lol.

We exposed the market to its natural forces and ended stupid subsidies and funding for badly run companies.
 
What other act is there where that particular market was freed? Lol.

We exposed the market to its natural forces and ended stupid subsidies and funding for badly run companies.

But the lizard didn't slip a debit into raindrops before.

barfo
 
Oh, this I've gotta hear. In what way is the airline industry 'much better'?

barfo

Well, for one, when an airline(s) struggles, or mergers take place or the like, there's no direct financial consequence/burden on the taxpayer. I'm all for a free marketplace. Conversely, let's keep a close eye on the USPS to see how they end up making out. Will they end up becoming privatized?
 
Well, for one, when an airline(s) struggles, or mergers take place or the like, there's no direct financial consequence/burden on the taxpayer.

When was there ever? To my knowledge, only after 9/11 (which happened after deregulation).

barfo
 
Lol dude there's only one act out there and you messed up.

The only act out there is your act, and it's wearing a bit old.

You said bailouts, and deregulation has nothing whatsoever to do with bailouts.

If you want to have a conversation, try making sense.

lol dude.

barfo
 
The only act out there is your act, and it's wearing a bit old.

You said bailouts, and deregulation has nothing whatsoever to do with bailouts.

If you want to have a conversation, try making sense.

lol .

barfo

"For example the airline industry used to be public sector, now it isn't"

Woops, your bad.
 
"For example the airline industry used to be public sector, now it isn't"

Woops, your bad.

Serious question: Do you actually think what you type makes sense? Are you just jerking me around, or are you really really high?

barfo
 
Serious question: Do you actually think what you type makes sense? Are you just jerking me around, or are you really really high?

barfo

Dude you don't have any excuses, take some midol and read slower next time I promise you'll feel better.

There's only one act that freed that market, in your rush to judge me you made a bad comment. I forgive you man.
 
but for the fact that it's not, you have a point. money is collected for the betterment of society, GPA's aren't.

Me getting a 4.0 doesn't do much of anything (yes, I know it can lead to a better job opportunity), whereas me paying taxes, or having the money collected from my taxes distributed for the betterment of the society does.

It's a really lame argument to make actually (not you personally), because "sharing" GPA doesn't provide you with more services that are on par with what sharing wealth could do.

Did you hear that? It was the point of that article whizzing over your head.
 
Dude you don't have any excuses, take some midol and read slower next time I promise you'll feel better.

There's only one act that freed that market, in your rush to judge me you made a bad comment. I forgive you man.

You haven't (and cannot) explain what bailouts have to do with it. So I forgive you too, but I'm going to try (and probably fail) to not respond to any more of your posts.

barfo
 
barfo first off, why are you focused on the most unimportant BS in this entire thread? Lol ok whatever though I'll deal with you.


You haven't (and cannot) explain what bailouts have to do with it. So I forgive you too, but I'm going to try (and probably fail) to not respond to any more of your posts.

barfo

Well you simply haven't learned a thing about the public sector.

Barfo whenever the government runs any sector, they channel millions of taxpayer dollars into their terribly run companies. Socialism prescribes fixed rates and laws in situations where they are not ideal, hence we have to bail them out.

And subsidies were ended by the act as well. You're like Chris Matthew's clone, chill brah.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top