Politics #ReleaseTheMemo ?

Welcome to our community

Be a part of something great, join today!

Register Log in
MarAzul said:
People are going to jail.
Ha! No one around to issue pardons!
Click to expand...

Who is going to jail?

Trump can still issue pardons even when he's golfing at Mar-a-Lago. Technically, he's the president.

barfo
 
barfo said:
Who is going to jail?

Trump can still issue pardons even when he's golfing at Mar-a-Lago. Technically, he's the president.

barfo
Click to expand...

He'll issue a pardon and then have a porn star roll it up and spank him with it.
 
SlyPokerDog said:
I like this! Locking up anyone who gets sick will lower healthcare costs for the rest of us!
Click to expand...

Prisoners are provided 100% free (taxpaid) health and dental care.

Obamacare was actually copied from that model.
 
Dems shutting down federal government to prevent arrest of Obama and Hillary! :MARIS61:
 
barfo said:
Who is going to jail?

Trump can still issue pardons even when he's golfing at Mar-a-Lago. Technically, he's the president.

barfo
Click to expand...
Only a weekend hack would profane the sacred game by talking business on the tees or greens. Chat in the fairways if you must, but the 19th hole is where business is conducted.
 
http://dailycaller.com/2018/01/23/i...expressed-concern-about-joining-mueller-team/

In ‘Jaw-Dropping’ Text, Peter Strzok Expressed ‘Concern’ About Joining Mueller Team


The FBI’s top agent on the Trump-Russia investigation sent a text message last year that one top Republican senator says suggests he saw no evidence of Trump campaign collusion.

The text message, which was sent by Peter Strzok, is “jaw-dropping,” Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson, the chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, said ina radio interviewon Tuesday.

In an interview with WISN-Milwaukee radio host Jay Weber, Johnson read aloud a May 19, 2017 text that Strzok sent to Lisa Page, an FBI lawyer and his mistress.

Strzok wrote: “You and I both know the odds are nothing. If I thought it was likely, I’d be there no question. I hesitate in part because of my gut sense and concern that there’s no big there there.”

 
^^^ It seems like a lot of there there, when it comes to these text messages. A bunch of them disappeared, according to the FBI.

http://thehill.com/policy/national-...-leave-no-stone-unturned-to-find-why-fbi-text

Sessions announces DOJ probe of missing FBI text messages

Attorney General Jeff Sessions on Monday announced the Justice Department will investigate missing text messages sent between two FBI agents critical of President Trump, joining the chorus of Republican lawmakers who are eager to recover the exchange.

GOP officials have seized on the messages as evidence of FBI bias against Trump in the probes into Russian election meddling and Hillary Clinton's use of a private email server while secretary of State.

“We will leave no stone unturned to confirm with certainty why these text messages are not now available to be produced and will use every technology available to determine whether the missing messages are recoverable from another source," Sessions said in a statement.

"I have spoken to the Inspector General and a review is already underway to ascertain what occurred and to determine if these records can be recovered in any other way. If any wrongdoing were to be found to have caused this gap, appropriate legal disciplinary action measures will be taken," he continued.
 
Denny Crane said:
http://dailycaller.com/2018/01/23/i...expressed-concern-about-joining-mueller-team/

In ‘Jaw-Dropping’ Text, Peter Strzok Expressed ‘Concern’ About Joining Mueller Team


The FBI’s top agent on the Trump-Russia investigation sent a text message last year that one top Republican senator says suggests he saw no evidence of Trump campaign collusion.

The text message, which was sent by Peter Strzok, is “jaw-dropping,” Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson, the chairman of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, said ina radio interviewon Tuesday.

In an interview with WISN-Milwaukee radio host Jay Weber, Johnson read aloud a May 19, 2017 text that Strzok sent to Lisa Page, an FBI lawyer and his mistress.

Strzok wrote: “You and I both know the odds are nothing. If I thought it was likely, I’d be there no question. I hesitate in part because of my gut sense and concern that there’s no big there there.”
Click to expand...


So, this supposedly incredibly-biased-against-Trump agent didn't think the investigation had legs and didn't want to participate? Doesn't that pretty much undercut the narrative against him that the Fox/Trump/Denny Crane cabal has been spinning?

barfo
 
Denny Crane said:
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018...sa-memo-set-rock-dc-end-mueller-investigation

An educated guess by anyone who's been paying attention for the last year leads to the obvious conclusion that the report reveals extensive abuse of power and highly illegal collusion between the Obama administration, the FBI, the DOJ and the Clinton Campaign against Donald Trump and his team during and after the 2016 presidential election.
Click to expand...
Good! Those are real patriots trying to protect us from a maniac!
 
barfo said:
So, this supposedly incredibly-biased-against-Trump agent didn't think the investigation had legs and didn't want to participate? Doesn't that pretty much undercut the narrative against him that the Fox/Trump/Denny Crane cabal has been spinning?

barfo
Click to expand...
I'm kind of with you that this seems like a nothingburger, but it could be spun that:
1) "supposedly incredibly-biased-against-Trump agent" (I think his texts kind of out him as not needing that "supposedly", but whatever)
2) changed the Comey memo from something criminal to something not...
3) Investigated the Trump/Russia election shenanigans
4) didn't think the investigation had legs
5) didn't want to participate with Mueller in May 2017
6) (months of deleted texts, missing emails, etc.)
7) agent is on the case as a lead investigator
8) (some texts are found saying in 2016 that he approved of the "insurance policy" in case Trump got elected)
9) resigns in July 2017

seems fishy.
 
barfo said:
So, this supposedly incredibly-biased-against-Trump agent didn't think the investigation had legs and didn't want to participate? Doesn't that pretty much undercut the narrative against him that the Fox/Trump/Denny Crane cabal has been spinning?

barfo
Click to expand...

That there's no there there (what I've been saying all along)? This is the head of the FBI investigation into collusion.

It kind of supports Trump saying it's a witch hunt. Going after him when there's no there there.

upload_2018-1-23_12-7-42.png
 
BrianFromWA said:
I'm kind of with you that this seems like a nothingburger, but it could be spun that:
1) "supposedly incredibly-biased-against-Trump agent" (I think his texts kind of out him as not needing that "supposedly", but whatever)
Click to expand...

I haven't read his texts, but as I understand it there are texts critical of various non-Trump politicians as well, including democrats.
Maybe he's just biased against everyone.

2) changed the Comey memo from something criminal to something not...
3) Investigated the Trump/Russia election shenanigans
4) didn't think the investigation had legs
5) didn't want to participate with Mueller in May 2017
6) (months of deleted texts, missing emails, etc.)
7) agent is on the case as a lead investigator
8) (some texts are found saying in 2016 that he approved of the "insurance policy" in case Trump got elected)
9) resigns in July 2017

seems fishy.
Click to expand...

I don't think he resigned. He was reassigned.

barfo
 
Denny Crane said:
That there's no there there (what I've been saying all along)? This is the head of the FBI investigation into collusion.

It kind of supports Trump saying it's a witch hunt. Going after him when there's no there there.
Click to expand...

Yes, it gives support to the witch hunt theory, but it seriously undercuts the 'Strzok is an evil biased liberal out to get Trump' story.

I'll note that saying there's no there there before doing the investigation might not be conclusive.

barfo
 
barfo said:
Yes, it gives support to the witch hunt theory, but it seriously undercuts the 'Strzok is an evil biased liberal out to get Trump' story.

I'll note that saying there's no there there before doing the investigation might not be conclusive.

barfo
Click to expand...

I don't talk about Strzok being an evil biased liberal. You have me confused with someone else.

My only concern with the guy is that he is doing everything ethically. His ethical issues are what are coming to light. Things like deleting those texts. To Mueller's credit, he did fire the guy. Mueller always hires the best guys, right? (I do not call for Mueller to be fired or his investigation to end before he's done).

The evil biased liberal who investigated the trump collusion angles with the full backing of the FBI came to the conclusion there's no there there.
 
Denny Crane said:
I don't talk about Strzok being an evil biased liberal. You have me confused with someone else.

My only concern with the guy is that he is doing everything ethically. His ethical issues are what are coming to light. Things like deleting those texts. To Mueller's credit, he did fire the guy. Mueller always hires the best guys, right? (I do not call for Mueller to be fired or his investigation to end before he's done).

The evil biased liberal who investigated the trump collusion angles with the full backing of the FBI came to the conclusion there's no there there.
Click to expand...

Well, so much for that.

barfo
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top