Repeal the Bill of Rights

[Sinobas]

Exhibit A of the problem with real democracy. People are fucking ignorant!

 

[Nikolokolus]

Good job schools.

 

[Denny Crane]

barfo.

 

[SlyPokerDog]

Hillary's husband is the Bill of Lefts.

 

[crandc]

Obviously there is no such plan, no world order, no proposal by Clinton.

Who is this interviewer? Mark Dick, professional conspiracy theorist, who claims with no evidence that 9/11 was an "inside job", previously claimed Obama was going to repeal the Bill of Rights, argues that "secret" societies (that only he knows about) are taking over the world.

Not all of these people are Clinton supporters, if you listen. Some of them answered his question I don't know, possibly, maybe, think about it, some of it.

I'd bet he carefully edited out all the people who said "you're full of shit, she never said that and I don't support it".

 

[Denny Crane]

Obviously there is no such plan, no world order, no proposal by Clinton.

Who is this interviewer? Mark Dick, professional conspiracy theorist, who claims with no evidence that 9/11 was an "inside job", previously claimed Obama was going to repeal the Bill of Rights, argues that "secret" societies (that only he knows about) are taking over the world.

Not all of these people are Clinton supporters, if you listen. Some of them answered his question I don't know, possibly, maybe, think about it, some of it.

I'd bet he carefully edited out all the people who said "you're full of shit, she never said that and I don't support it".

He conspired to make Hillary supporters, and barfo, want to repeal the bill of rights?

 

[PtldPlatypus]

Obviously there is no such plan, no world order, no proposal by Clinton.

Who is this interviewer? Mark Dick, professional conspiracy theorist, who claims with no evidence that 9/11 was an "inside job", previously claimed Obama was going to repeal the Bill of Rights, argues that "secret" societies (that only he knows about) are taking over the world.

Not all of these people are Clinton supporters, if you listen. Some of them answered his question I don't know, possibly, maybe, think about it, some of it.

I'd bet he carefully edited out all the people who said "you're full of shit, she never said that and I don't support it".

I'm sure if he went and interviewed Trump supporters, he could get a similar number of similar responses. Although I'm sure he intended to show that people support Hilary regardless of any position she might hold, all he showed is that there are plenty of stupid people around.

 

[julius]

He conspired to make Hillary supporters, and barfo, want to repeal the bill of rights?

To make it APPEAR that way. Like Crandc said, and PtldPlatypus said, editing can be done to make a group of people appear stupid, or totally oblivious to anything.

It's like how Jay-Walking made people look really stupid. If you interview 100 people who are Blazer fans , and 10 of them are casual fans and don't realize that LaMarcus signed with Spurs (or that Brandon Roy retired a while ago), a good editor could make it appear that 100% of Blazer fans are as stupid as your average Laker fan. (see what I did there?)

This is just the same as that stupid PP video, it scares a significant enough group of the populace, and serves a purpose. It's a stupid purpose though.

 

[BrianFromWA]

wait, did you just compare 4 videos of people confirming they sell fetus parts (even from "birthed" babies) to a video displaying people with no civic understanding?

 

[Denny Crane]

I think it's typical of much of the population. They're just clueless about Hillary (or Trump or anyone else) and the Bill of Rights.

 

[Sinobas]

Obviously there is no such plan, no world order, no proposal by Clinton.

Who is this interviewer? Mark Dick, professional conspiracy theorist, who claims with no evidence that 9/11 was an "inside job", previously claimed Obama was going to repeal the Bill of Rights, argues that "secret" societies (that only he knows about) are taking over the world.

Not all of these people are Clinton supporters, if you listen. Some of them answered his question I don't know, possibly, maybe, think about it, some of it.

I'd bet he carefully edited out all the people who said "you're full of shit, she never said that and I don't support it".

Leaving that aside, the main point is that those people had no idea what they were talking about. Of course, who knows how many intelligent responses he got in proportion to those. But still, the fact that he was able to find that many in an afternoon is sad.

 

[Denny Crane]

They're FOR HILLARY because she wants to get rid of the bill of rights.

They clearly have no clue what she stands for, period.

 

[MarAzul]

Yes and these people get to vote. Bullshit, we not only need to show ID but pass a competence test.

 

[MarAzul]

editing can be done to make a group of people appear stupid

err, well it is sort of difficult to imagine how the guy edited the black guys part about the bill of rights being unjust to black people.
Can you lend some insight here?

 

[MARIS61]

They're FOR HILLARY because she wants to get rid of the bill of rights.

They clearly have no clue what she stands for, period.

True, and I'm certain they've never actually read The Bill of Rights, nor do they understand whom it was written to protect us (them) from.

Since I doubt more than a handful of posters here are any less clueless about it, The Bill of Rights was written solely to protect citizens from tyranny by our own government.

As for Hilary, she fully supports repealing The Second Amendment which in one fell sweep would nullify all the others.

 

[julius]

wait, did you just compare 4 videos of people confirming they sell fetus parts (even from "birthed" babies) to a video displaying people with no civic understanding?

In the sense that videos can be, are and will be edited to say or present a particular message that was not originally said, yes.

 

[MARIS61]

The bias here is against libs, but anyone could do the same video with any other politician in Hilary's place.

Nearly half of all Americans are less educated than the other half.

Over 2/3 of the world's population are less educated than the dumbest moron in America.

Quite an obstacle to achieving world peace.

 

[magnifier661]

There are more stupid liberals that vote because of they think democrats should be the only party to support than Republicans. This is why the democrats always have the edge in most elections.

I mean the whole riots back east was because of racism, when a black cop killed a black drug dealer when the attorney general and government was majority black.

 

[bodyman5000 and 1]

There are more stupid liberals that vote because of they think democrats should be the only party to support than Republicans. This is why the democrats always have the edge in most elections.

I mean the whole riots back east was because of racism, when a black cop killed a black drug dealer when the attorney general and government was majority black.

^^^^^^

 

[barfo]

There are more stupid liberals that vote because of they think democrats should be the only party to support than Republicans. This is why the democrats always have the edge in most elections.

Those damn liberals, always voting and stuff. How dare they.

barfo

 

[magnifier661]

Those damn liberals, always voting and stuff. How dare they.

barfo

So u think its okay to vote for the people that run your country without knowing who or what they are truly voting for? Seems very liberal of you.

Are you the head of Portland metro voting liberal with deceased voters?

 

[Denny Crane]

It's fine they vote, but clearly they're suckers voting for the wicked witch of the west for no good reason.

 

[magnifier661]

It's fine they vote, but clearly they're suckers voting for the wicked witch of the west for no good reason.

I wonder what would really happen if people actually voted after truly understanding who or what they vote for? I think both parties would have some serious changes

 

[barfo]

So u think its okay to vote for the people that run your country without knowing who or what they are truly voting for? Seems very liberal of you.

That's our system of government. Why do you hate the constitution, Mags?

Are you the head of Portland metro voting liberal with deceased voters?

I don't know what that means, but let's say yes.

barfo

 

[lawai'a]

perhaps as suggested by several founding fathers it should be limited to white-male- landholders, the gentry ?(green font)

 

[magnifier661]

That's our system of government. Why do you hate the constitution, Mags?

The right to vote is fine. Just like the right for people to have children. But when people have children that they can't take care of, they are being irresponsible. They can still vote or have children, but I can talk all the trash about how fucking stupid they are. Almost democratic stupid.

I don't know what that means, but let's say yes.

barfo

Glad u admit it

 

[magnifier661]

perhaps as suggested by several founding fathers it should be limited to white-male- landholders, the gentry ?(green font)

Or how about people that vote responsibly?

 

[lawai'a]

Or how about people that vote responsibly?

define

 

[lawai'a]

The right to vote is fine. Just like the right for people to have children. But when people have children that they can't take care of, they are being irresponsible. They can still vote or have children, but I can talk all the trash about how fucking stupid they are. Almost democratic stupid.

Glad u admit it

how about the right to decide to terminate said pregnancy

 

[magnifier661]

how about the right to decide to terminate said pregnancy

I support that right. But what about those that decide to have them and ruin the lives of innocent children?